0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
We have to keep in mind that you used a picture of Mike in 1993/94. Here is one of the most recent pics of MJ before June 25, 2009:The bone structure and eyebrow arch are way off!!This could've passed for MJ in 1993 MAYBE (not likely even then because his vitiligo hadn't spread as much as it has now). The head is NOT MJ's imo, the body is NOT MJ's imo. This picture is in no way, shape or form a picture of Michael Jackson. I rest my case lol.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbO_g1k_7qs[/youtube]You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I've been going around and round on this autopsy photo and here's what I think.I think the photo is a combination of a wax mannequin and photoshopping. Clearly, there is the technology to make a mannequin replica of Michael Jackson (Madame Toussauds is proof of that). And we know photoshop can easily be utilized (ambulance picture).But perhaps the mannequin in the autopsy photo does not "function" like a lucid person (in other words if you lie it down, say on a gurney, it does not have the "aura" of the living person it's replicating--->Michael Jackson). The difference between the Leave me alone video (where Michael has a wax replica of himself lying down) and this autopsy picture is that with moving video frames, the "fakeness" of the object is not so obvious. But in a "still" shot/picture, like this autopsy photo, it is more apparent.This is where the photoshop comes in. The shadows created are from an overlay (a picture on top of a picture---or in this case a picture of the mannequin on the gurney with a picture of Michaels face super imposed over it) to give it a more "humanistic" look .I think this was done also with the "death" pic, which would explain the awkward positioning of the body (and odd leg angles).The Iodine/Betadine staining and "bruising" are meant to distract from the face (which is turned away from the camera). This is intentional because the photoshopped face is not an exact match, it is only meant to give the "wax Michael" a softer, more human appearance.The body in the "death" photo, the head is turned to the left (camera facing) with bright light....but in the autopsy photo the head is facing to the right (away from the camera) in dark lighting. The "light/dark" presentation would give the illusion that the photos where "taken" at different locations.The light quality, picture angle, tubing, twisted sheets etc...is all designed to distract us from looking really hard at the details of the face (at least to a casual observer---but obviously us HOAX people would pick it apart :lol: ).So my conclusion is that because the ambulance photo was a fake, that we can assume these photos are also fake.Remember, only ONE coroner testified under oath...Christopher Rogers (and he made no references to the photo). The other coroner/toxicologist Dan Anderson, was GIVEN vials of blood to test (He did not draw the blood himself)*In my opinion, there are two "bodies" a real 50 year old John Doe terminal ill patient (who was transported from Carolwood to UCLA and worked on) and a wax replica of Michael Jackson (death/autopsy pic photo evidence).*The medic said the patient looked like an old terminally ill white man....DOES ANYONE SEE THAT IN THIS AUTOPSY PIC?....I think not! 8-)
This is an old video, but where did all that pictures come from?[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPfxoklQkpk&feature=related[/youtube]
Someone asked back on page 8 if we could compare the picture with MJ coming out of the pool. I did that and posted it last week in the TIAI thread, but I will post it here too. I altered the autopsy picture to make the size more believable, because I think they squeezed it and made the legs look shorter. Anyways, I think it's a match.
Hi I found this picture it stated that it was on his final days. You can see he is having wrinkles on his upper lip and his neck.. So how can the autposy picture be him.. Yes it is him when he was in his late 30 early 40.. Here is the picture.