0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: "all4loveandbelieve"What puzzles me is the syringe. Why did they auction the syringe when they need it for evidence for court? They just saw for finger prints and said well let's make money and auction the syringe.. We don't need to show this syringe as evidence to court. How are the jury going to make a verdict if they don't see. When they have evidence you do not get rid of the evidence before the trial. You wait after the trial to auction it. This is another off thing that does not make sense. For me, I think I just never believed it was real...either the syringe itself or even the whole auction. It was just too odd that it would be auctioned off...and so soon. You are totally right that they would need that for evidence. If it was stolen and they were trying to auction it, the police should have stepped in. If it was not stolen, it should have remained in the hands of the police. I just don't buy that it was real....maybe it's just me~ :roll: "sigh"Blessings Always
What puzzles me is the syringe. Why did they auction the syringe when they need it for evidence for court? They just saw for finger prints and said well let's make money and auction the syringe.. We don't need to show this syringe as evidence to court. How are the jury going to make a verdict if they don't see. When they have evidence you do not get rid of the evidence before the trial. You wait after the trial to auction it. This is another off thing that does not make sense.
Quote from: "2good2btrue"Quote from: "Miss.Peppers"@2good2betrue The article says the prints dont match any of the Jackson family.But how would they know that??? Did they have all the family give their fingerprints when they are not even suspects??Yes, they could have given prints to help the investigation. Its not uncommon.For example.. if your house gets burgled, the cops will take your prints in order to discount them from any they find at the scene.
Quote from: "Miss.Peppers"@2good2betrue The article says the prints dont match any of the Jackson family.But how would they know that??? Did they have all the family give their fingerprints when they are not even suspects??
@2good2betrue The article says the prints dont match any of the Jackson family.
Quote from: "Miss.Peppers"Quote from: "2good2btrue"Quote from: "Miss.Peppers"@2good2betrue The article says the prints dont match any of the Jackson family.But how would they know that??? Did they have all the family give their fingerprints when they are not even suspects??Yes, they could have given prints to help the investigation. Its not uncommon.For example.. if your house gets burgled, the cops will take your prints in order to discount them from any they find at the scene.Wait... im not sure if its the same in the US but here in the UK someone has to be arrested before the police can take their fingerprints or question them...?? :?