Paris Jackson Twitter @ParisJackson

[Australian MJ BeLIEver]

Something I picked out of the Bashir interviews. MJ only tapes his fingers when he is performing.

@ bec. Thanx. Been a fan for a long time and ALWAYS love learning something new. Thanks, this is great. It actually makes me look look at photographs / footage with bandages that I have looked at 100's of times from another perspective. I love a fresh perspective on something that I thought I knew so well. It's refreshing to be excited by things you have seen so many times yet see differently for the first time  :icon_razz:

[MaryK]

Paris Jacksoη ‏@ParisJackson
that awkward moment when everyone is saying no to doing the right thing...... if i want to cut my hair and donate it i'd appreciate SOME support

hummm... interesting! a new haircut and she will donate her HAIR!? IDK for others, but I immediately thought of this older article:

Paris Jackson Gets Haircut, Security Collects DNA -  posted by Free Britney at September 2, 2009 [...]The reason? To ensure that Paris' DNA will not be used for any paternity testing: "Can you imagine the value of Paris's hair? DNA, the truth, finally.[....]"
:confused: :icon_exclaim: :animal0017:

I also think she hasn't yet cut her hair. Those wig-photos are there just to test the public's reactions  :icon_e_wink:

Paris is a beautiful, GORGEOUS girl and at her young age , ANY, I mean ANY haircut would look great on her!
It's a wonderful gesture of her to get involved in charity in such an awkward way for a teenage girl.

I mean I know it's hard for a teenager to have her haircut, it's almost like a sacrifice lol I am 32 and I wouldn't cut my hair for any reason, other maybe than charity loll if you're a long-hair type person, then it's SOOO difficult to even imagine yourself with a short haircut!
When I had shortened my hair few years ago...OMG! I couldn't even dress or sleep at night, I would always have those gestures of moving my hand through my hair and every-time I was reminded that it was not there anymore I would get frustrated! lol It's easier if you shorten it gradually, you get accustomed ... but if you have long hair and then suddenly you cut it short...euhh it's difficult to adapt! at least it was for me! loll I didn't even like anymore how certain blouses looked on me after that. lol! as the hair was sort of like part of the "accessories". I was really pissed off for about six months until my hair was at a more "comfortable length" for my taste! loll
So Paris, if you do it, you're a great courageous girl! lol

Yes...I immediately thought of DNA testing too.

We had quite a lot of DNA stuff going on....the black mask, hair from a drain, Fiddes and Blanket, now this.

DNA must reveal the truth.

But I have not clue about the how and when.

[flory24]

DNA must reveal the truth.

What truth?as far as I'm concerned, the truth is one the three kids are Michael's

And if the contrary he is not their biological father where is the relevance?

Michael told us so many times that he has 3 kids: Paris, Prince, Blanket. No matter if he is or not their biological father, he his their father.

Why is this a concern to us?

[Australian MJ BeLIEver]

Flory, agree with you 100%, a parent is a parent regardless of how, when and by whom the child is conceived. Most importantly, yes, NONE of our business. However, I think you may have misinterpreted the last post. I don't know that Mary (and MK pls correct me if I am wrong) is bringing up DNA in relation to MJ's kids and whether they are his biological children. The DNA question has been bought up many times in the hoax.

Remember DNA is the one thing that could prove that there was a dead MJ at UCLA / Autopsy table, etc. No such DNA testing has ever been produced.

I believe that Mary is highlighting that DNA keeps popping up throughout the hoax... or the lack of it.

[MaryK]

DNA must reveal the truth.

What truth?as far as I'm concerned, the truth is one the three kids are Michael's

And if the contrary he is not their biological father where is the relevance?

Michael told us so many times that he has 3 kids: Paris, Prince, Blanket. No matter if he is or not their biological father, he his their father.

Why is this a concern to us?

Oh no, this is not about the kids. Not at all.

Just about the fact that whoever died June 25 in 2009 is not Michael.

Sorry if my statement was ambiguous.
Or, alternatively, that the whole thing was fake anyway.

[MaryK]

Flory, agree with you 100%, a parent is a parent regardless of how, when and by whom the child is conceived. Most importantly, yes, NONE of our business. However, I think you may have misinterpreted the last post. I don't know that Mary (and MK pls correct me if I am wrong) is bringing up DNA in relation to MJ's kids and whether they are his biological children. The DNA question has been bought up many times in the hoax.

Remember DNA is the one thing that could prove that there was a dead MJ at UCLA / Autopsy table, etc. No such DNA testing has ever been produced.

I believe that Mary is highlighting that DNA keeps popping up throughout the hoax... or the lack of it.

Yes, thank you :-) These were my thoughts.

[Australian MJ BeLIEver]

@ MK, glad to see I still 'get you' after my long absence  :bearhug:

[MaryK]

@ MK, glad to see I still 'get you' after my long absence  :bearhug:

Why wouldn´t you?   ;)

Good to see you back here  :bearhug:

[flory24]

Flory, agree with you 100%, a parent is a parent regardless of how, when and by whom the child is conceived. Most importantly, yes, NONE of our business. However, I think you may have misinterpreted the last post. I don't know that Mary (and MK pls correct me if I am wrong) is bringing up DNA in relation to MJ's kids and whether they are his biological children. The DNA question has been bought up many times in the hoax.

Remember DNA is the one thing that could prove that there was a dead MJ at UCLA / Autopsy table, etc. No such DNA testing has ever been produced.

I believe that Mary is highlighting that DNA keeps popping up throughout the hoax... or the lack of it.

Yes, thank you :-) These were my thoughts.

Sorry, i guess i misinterpreted the last post of MaryK. Sorry Maryk. Friends again? :smiley-vault-misc-150:

No such DNA testing has ever been produced, because there is not a dead body.

:bearhug: :bearhug:

[MaryK]

Flory, agree with you 100%, a parent is a parent regardless of how, when and by whom the child is conceived. Most importantly, yes, NONE of our business. However, I think you may have misinterpreted the last post. I don't know that Mary (and MK pls correct me if I am wrong) is bringing up DNA in relation to MJ's kids and whether they are his biological children. The DNA question has been bought up many times in the hoax.

Remember DNA is the one thing that could prove that there was a dead MJ at UCLA / Autopsy table, etc. No such DNA testing has ever been produced.

I believe that Mary is highlighting that DNA keeps popping up throughout the hoax... or the lack of it.

Yes, thank you :-) These were my thoughts.

Sorry, i guess i misinterpreted the last post of MaryK. Sorry Maryk. Friends again? :smiley-vault-misc-150:

No such DNA testing has ever been produced, because there is not a dead body.

:bearhug: :bearhug:

Never mind  :bearhug:

Well either there is no dead body or the dead body wasn´t MJ´s.

Oh mystery  :icon_e_wink:

[MaryK]

But back to topic:

In the closet....yeah right  :icon_albino: :icon_lol:

[SimPattyK]

[...]
No such DNA testing has ever been produced, because there is not a dead body.
[...]

It was said back in 2009 that they took his brains out during the autopsy...
And that there were some other samples taken from the body, presumably, allegedly, supposedly... and whatever -gly words there are!  :icon_lol:
Well then I would like to see those DNA tests in case that's true!  :icon_geek:

[wishingstar]

I thought I remembered hair samples collected from Michael at Forest Lawn:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/file/michael-jackson-autopsy-report?page=22

[finfin]

I thought I remembered hair samples collected from Michael at Forest Lawn:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/file/michael-jackson-autopsy-report?page=22

Yes thank you @wishingstar  the memorable occasion that LaToya told us about in her book? This video illustrates how unbelievable it all is

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXa25XMuzXU&feature=plcp

[bec]

There was no body.