0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: "shelby61"We have seen alot of instances since the beginning of this hoax of the old man, from Marlon referencing Michael in the memorial service to flash mobs, etc. The appearance of an old man seems to pop up in reference to Michael Jackson alot. He may or may not be Michael, but maybe we should take it a step further and find out who is "The Old Man" who does he represent, does it come from books, poetry, etc...to me there is perhaps a deeper meaning to this "Old Man" theory. Since many of you are split on whether it is MJ or not, the Old Man could be a representation of what MJ is trying to convey. I have to admit though in that flashmob video he was was right on with the moves. I agree on this wholeheartedly. What if we are all still players in his movie and this old man is part of the hoax?? Maybe not Michael, but representing something he wants to get across..I find it funny that at the funeral we have hat man on his cell, and in this video we have this old manon his cell. What if when all is revealed this is one big movie and we find out that the old men arejust characters in the movie. Maybe, hat man and this old man are supposed to be chatting on their cellphones for a scene in Michael's movie. Could it be that all of these things we are seeing will be edited together and at the end will finally make sense?I am not making sense am I ?? What I am trying to say is that it seems as if there are reoccuring charactersin this hoax. Edit alot of this stuff we have seen and witnessed together and you have a movie.But when does this movie end??
We have seen alot of instances since the beginning of this hoax of the old man, from Marlon referencing Michael in the memorial service to flash mobs, etc. The appearance of an old man seems to pop up in reference to Michael Jackson alot. He may or may not be Michael, but maybe we should take it a step further and find out who is "The Old Man" who does he represent, does it come from books, poetry, etc...to me there is perhaps a deeper meaning to this "Old Man" theory. Since many of you are split on whether it is MJ or not, the Old Man could be a representation of what MJ is trying to convey. I have to admit though in that flashmob video he was was right on with the moves.
Quote from: "Gema"Quote from: "all4loveandbelieve"Gema does it occur to you that some people in this forum English is not their first language? English is not my first language either Well you are fortunate that your english is better than others. Just please be patient with some members. I am sure if i would write in Russian and it is not my first language I would make plenty of mistake. (this is an example i do not speak russian. )
Quote from: "all4loveandbelieve"Gema does it occur to you that some people in this forum English is not their first language? English is not my first language either
Gema does it occur to you that some people in this forum English is not their first language?
So let me get this...This video is a professional video..like by Sony, right?And the old man is in it?And the old man is at the flash mob dances too?That old man, if he's dancing in the professional video, just can't happen to be at all those other dances unless the flash dances were staged by Sony...with the same dancers.
Quote from: "Lovely One"Quote from: "shelby61"We have seen alot of instances since the beginning of this hoax of the old man, from Marlon referencing Michael in the memorial service to flash mobs, etc. The appearance of an old man seems to pop up in reference to Michael Jackson alot. He may or may not be Michael, but maybe we should take it a step further and find out who is "The Old Man" who does he represent, does it come from books, poetry, etc...to me there is perhaps a deeper meaning to this "Old Man" theory. Since many of you are split on whether it is MJ or not, the Old Man could be a representation of what MJ is trying to convey. I have to admit though in that flashmob video he was was right on with the moves. I agree on this wholeheartedly. What if we are all still players in his movie and this old man is part of the hoax?? Maybe not Michael, but representing something he wants to get across..I find it funny that at the funeral we have hat man on his cell, and in this video we have this old manon his cell. What if when all is revealed this is one big movie and we find out that the old men arejust characters in the movie. Maybe, hat man and this old man are supposed to be chatting on their cellphones for a scene in Michael's movie. Could it be that all of these things we are seeing will be edited together and at the end will finally make sense?I am not making sense am I ?? What I am trying to say is that it seems as if there are reoccuring charactersin this hoax. Edit alot of this stuff we have seen and witnessed together and you have a movie.But when does this movie end??I totally understand what you are saying and it could very well be that we are seeing a movie made and how it progresses (just like in This is It). Michael wanted to show us what it entailed to put on a concert and how he saw it through his eyes. Now I think we are experiencing the whole event in a reality v. illusion montage of images, pictures, pre-recorded events (ie the ambulance)... again I come back to my opinion that it is an alternate reality game, but more of interaction among people than an online game. An interaction between people online and in the real world as well ....and so what we perceive as real, maybe really isn't (ie the court room) and so the interaction crosses from reality into illusion and back.
Quote from: "all4loveandbelieve"Quote from: "Gema"Quote from: "all4loveandbelieve"Gema does it occur to you that some people in this forum English is not their first language? English is not my first language either Well you are fortunate that your english is better than others. Just please be patient with some members. I am sure if i would write in Russian and it is not my first language I would make plenty of mistake. (this is an example i do not speak russian. )Is not about commanding a language, is about labeling people using certain words I hope my position and point is clear about this issue since I don´t want to go on discussing the same all over.I have said all I needed to say regarding this matter.
[attachment=0:1jwddnjp]small_notebook_10.jpg[/attachment:1jwddnjp]why not? it's all possible. why would he do it? i think michael would be itching to be part of the action. not just because he likes to control his art, but another "in your face" moment for people to refer back to after the bam.
by Grace » Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:20 am Again and again I feel blessed to have been "called into" the VIP lounge for witnessing this dramaturgical masterpiece to unfold. I feel so sorry for all those who did not pay attention and did not question and do not listen or see and will never know about the "making of" in detail. They may be shaken in their fundamentals one day.I am grateful for this shower of love that we are being given repeatedly.This old guy was acting a little bit too frenetic for the intervertebral disk issues he assumedly could have according to his potential age. I like him a lot. Thanks Michael. It's an awesome journey.
by ignisaeternus » Wed Feb 23, 2011 8:21 am I have not seen the vid, but yes, there was an old man in Hold my hand.What the "old man" discussion makes me think of was the story of Benjamin Button: Born as an old man ....(then ageign in reverse) Re-born as an old man, maybe? As in, MJ is reborn into this new life as an old man before he comes back. Just throwing ideas out there..
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Loginby MJonmind » Thu Jan 13, 2011 6:20 pmRight since day one the movie, The Strange case of Benjamen Button, has stayed in the back of my mind. You say, he looked great, like in the 80's, the prime of his life. I believe the resurrected body will be the prime adult body, without the imperfections and deterioration that we all experience. That being said, Jesus' body though healed, had scars to prove his identy, in his hands, feet, side, to people like Thomas.
During performance, the performers frequently break the "fourth wall", directly addressing the audience and seemingly forgetting (or perhaps reminding the audience) that they are actors in a musical.
Quote from: "PureLove"My point of view is, you are loosing it and started to see MJ in everyone. You respect mine then Gema.In order to respect yours, first you need to approach people and present your opinion with respect, don´t you think? QuoteI'm sorry for using "paranoia". You are right about it. I shouldn't have labeled you guysThanks.QuoteBut seriously, my point is, everyone we think he is MJ is not MJ and everything we think it is related with the hoax, is not related with the hoax. We should make the difference.This same quote you could have use to make your point from the very beginning without falling in to labeling the other members Every research is valuable and thanks to "those people who see MJ everywhere" some other conclusions have been coming out. Dictating what people should see or not, or do or not should not, is far from giving an opinion.You say we should make the difference; well, how can you tell when and how to make the difference? is it there a bar measuring hoax/non hoax?In this particular case: 1- there is a video of "MJ"2- there are dancers who we don´t know and an old man dancing, jumping and clapping3- we have seen during the months "weird" looking characters4- we believe MJ is alive--->possibly in disguise--->this old man dancing, jumping and clapping?Why not???I am not really looking for your answers,if you have any, but now maybe, you and the other members who label the others for "seeing MJ", especially is this particular case, can be a little more emphatic and understand the "how come" before jumping to "you guys have MJ paranoia/ are paranoid/ are loosing it"You mentioned also how ironic it is. Well, it is even more ironic to see your posts in the army of love web and then read how you refer to your "fellow members".
My point of view is, you are loosing it and started to see MJ in everyone. You respect mine then Gema.
I'm sorry for using "paranoia". You are right about it. I shouldn't have labeled you guys
But seriously, my point is, everyone we think he is MJ is not MJ and everything we think it is related with the hoax, is not related with the hoax. We should make the difference.