0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
They do know.They say it themselves in their reply,how they know about his contributions of time and money to various charities but that he had negative press regarding children and they don't wish to be associated with him.Unbelieveable and as I said...selfish and ignorant.How many children could benefit from it?They aren't bothered because they might end up being in the media themselves and that would be tragic wouldn't it...morons.Maybe they are just pissed they aren't already on this list of charities he has helped in the past...AIDS Project L.A.American Cancer SocietyAngel FoodBig Brothers of Greater Los AngelesBMI Foundation, Inc.Brotherhood CrusadeBrothman Burn CenterCamp Ronald McDonaldChildhelp U.S.A.Children's Institute InternationalCities and Schools Scholarship FundCommunity Youth Sports & Arts FoundationCongressional Black Caucus (CBC)Dakar FoundationDreamstreet KidsDreams Come True CharityElizabeth Taylor Aids Foundation(Heal the world)Juvenile Diabetes FoundationLove MatchMake-A-Wish FoundationMinority Aids ProjectMotown MuseumNAACPNational Rainbow CoalitionRotary Club of AustraliaSociety of SingersStarlight FoundationThe Carter Center's Atlanta ProjectThe Sickle Cell Research FoundationTransafricaUnited Negro College Fund (UNCF)United Negro College Fund Ladder's of HopeVolunteers of AmericaWatts Summer FestivalWish GrantingYMCA - 28th Street/Crenshaw
Quote from: "Sinderella"They do know.They say it themselves in their reply,how they know about his contributions of time and money to various charities but that he had negative press regarding children and they don't wish to be associated with him.Unbelieveable and as I said...selfish and ignorant.How many children could benefit from it?They aren't bothered because they might end up being in the media themselves and that would be tragic wouldn't it...morons.Maybe they are just pissed they aren't already on this list of charities he has helped in the past...AIDS Project L.A.American Cancer SocietyAngel FoodBig Brothers of Greater Los AngelesBMI Foundation, Inc.Brotherhood CrusadeBrothman Burn CenterCamp Ronald McDonaldChildhelp U.S.A.Children's Institute InternationalCities and Schools Scholarship FundCommunity Youth Sports & Arts FoundationCongressional Black Caucus (CBC)Dakar FoundationDreamstreet KidsDreams Come True CharityElizabeth Taylor Aids Foundation(Heal the world)Juvenile Diabetes FoundationLove MatchMake-A-Wish FoundationMinority Aids ProjectMotown MuseumNAACPNational Rainbow CoalitionRotary Club of AustraliaSociety of SingersStarlight FoundationThe Carter Center's Atlanta ProjectThe Sickle Cell Research FoundationTransafricaUnited Negro College Fund (UNCF)United Negro College Fund Ladder's of HopeVolunteers of AmericaWatts Summer FestivalWish GrantingYMCA - 28th Street/Crenshaw I would not get all wound up over this. Simply shake the dust off your feet and let them find a WORTHY charitable organization to put as a hot button on the website. There are 8-) millions of worthy, honest charities. Also, the charity on the button could change regularly, in order to spread the donations around...You can't go nuts over every ignorant person on earth. Choose your battles carefully. In this one: just turn the other cheek and move on.Don't you think MJ had reasons for their not being on his list?? I have SERIOUS doubts about the integrity (let alone the intelligence) of any organization who is more afraid of losing funds which have already been committed to them, than opening their hands to future contributions, possibly of gigantic proportions, in comparison. This tells me they have gotten QUITE comfortable having their ADMINISTRATIVE salaries covered, and they do not want to rock THAT boat, EVEN for "The CHILDREN". This also tells me they don't even believe in their OWN cause!! They don't believe they CAN convey enough passion for the temporal needs of the world's children, in order to secure future funds. They are too interested in preserving any PRESUMED ignorant sensibilities of their static mailing list... If they are doing anything good, leave them to it. THEY, themselves, have decided they want nothing to do with the Name of the man who spoke about LOVE more than anyone on Earth :roll: ! You can't change frozen minds. Only God can. It is none of our business. Please, remember who it is you would be representing, before you fire off rabid comments to them! Just saying... :|
Quote from: "Its her"Quote from: "Sinderella"They do know.They say it themselves in their reply,how they know about his contributions of time and money to various charities but that he had negative press regarding children and they don't wish to be associated with him.Unbelieveable and as I said...selfish and ignorant.How many children could benefit from it?They aren't bothered because they might end up being in the media themselves and that would be tragic wouldn't it...morons.Maybe they are just pissed they aren't already on this list of charities he has helped in the past...AIDS Project L.A.American Cancer SocietyAngel FoodBig Brothers of Greater Los AngelesBMI Foundation, Inc.Brotherhood CrusadeBrothman Burn CenterCamp Ronald McDonaldChildhelp U.S.A.Children's Institute InternationalCities and Schools Scholarship FundCommunity Youth Sports & Arts FoundationCongressional Black Caucus (CBC)Dakar FoundationDreamstreet KidsDreams Come True CharityElizabeth Taylor Aids Foundation(Heal the world)Juvenile Diabetes FoundationLove MatchMake-A-Wish FoundationMinority Aids ProjectMotown MuseumNAACPNational Rainbow CoalitionRotary Club of AustraliaSociety of SingersStarlight FoundationThe Carter Center's Atlanta ProjectThe Sickle Cell Research FoundationTransafricaUnited Negro College Fund (UNCF)United Negro College Fund Ladder's of HopeVolunteers of AmericaWatts Summer FestivalWish GrantingYMCA - 28th Street/Crenshaw I would not get all wound up over this. Simply shake the dust off your feet and let them find a WORTHY charitable organization to put as a hot button on the website. There are 8-) millions of worthy, honest charities. Also, the charity on the button could change regularly, in order to spread the donations around...You can't go nuts over every ignorant person on earth. Choose your battles carefully. In this one: just turn the other cheek and move on.Don't you think MJ had reasons for their not being on his list?? I have SERIOUS doubts about the integrity (let alone the intelligence) of any organization who is more afraid of losing funds which have already been committed to them, than opening their hands to future contributions, possibly of gigantic proportions, in comparison. This tells me they have gotten QUITE comfortable having their ADMINISTRATIVE salaries covered, and they do not want to rock THAT boat, EVEN for "The CHILDREN". This also tells me they don't even believe in their OWN cause!! They don't believe they CAN convey enough passion for the temporal needs of the world's children, in order to secure future funds. They are too interested in preserving any PRESUMED ignorant sensibilities of their static mailing list... If they are doing anything good, leave them to it. THEY, themselves, have decided they want nothing to do with the Name of the man who spoke about LOVE more than anyone on Earth :roll: ! You can't change frozen minds. Only God can. It is none of our business. Please, remember who it is you would be representing, before you fire off rabid comments to them! Just saying... :| I appriciate your thoughts and comments,but please do not tell me what to and what not what to do.I know you mean well but I don't need to be told who I would represent to turn the other cheek to,and how to feel about certain things going on in the world.I am a grown woman.What rabid comments?I haven't said in any of my posts I was contacting anyone,I have stated my feelings on the organisation and their comments/behaviour regarding this matter.Which I am entitled to do as someone who supports Michael,and also gives to charity.I have shared a piece of information that is being shared and talked about within all circles of the MJ community-nons,believers,fanatics,supporters.I never wrote the thing and I have never projected a wish to try and change their minds.It is more than clear they are set on staying in 2005 with the media's BS lies and can't move on.With that all in mind,although they appear to be frozen minded and unable to think for themselves,I do feel it is my business.I they were to put a donation envelope through my door and I never knew what they had said about Michael,I would happily be giving them money under false pretences and I'm not ok with that tbh.As I said I appriciate your comments and point of view and I do question their integrity myself so I'm with you 100% on that but I don't appriciate you directing your comments soley at me.99.9% of everyone commenting on this thread feels the same about it so please direct your thoughts to everyone as a group or as your opinion =]
Sarahli wrote: I'm very sad to learn that. Problem is that not only them hold these prejudices against Michael and this is the result of the conspiracy, of the media lies. Therefore the problem has to be solved at its root.
As for my SUGGESTIONs (I thought that the purpose of these boards was to express opinions) I wasn't even talking to you, let alone "solely" to you, and you know it. Your post doesn't say anything about retaliation, and you said you had no intention of making rabid comments. Why would I direct comments to you??? QuoteI knew it?No,I didn't I said what I thought.You quoted my post did you not?so yes,I thought it was directed at me.You quoted no one else so I personally don't think I am wrong for assuming that.You insist on being treated like a grown woman (where have I heard that before? Oh, yes, Deb French, is that YOU? Hello, again.), and then you proceed to disrespect me in the manner you perceive I have disrespected you. :? QuoteExcuse me??!!That's quite rude.I have not insisted on anything,I merely stated.No,I am not Deborah French.The only dealings with her I have had are via twitter and she is a non believer.She is also British...and an entireley other person.I did not 'disrespect you AT ALL.I actually said TWICE I valued your opinions. And, btw, I am not intimidated at all by your mention of the "99.9%". Whether you meant it aggressively as, "the mob rules" or just to demonstrate solidarity, those 99.9% are entitled to their individual opinions as well. They do not alter mine. And there is no animosity.Quotethat comment was not written to intimidate ANYONE.I do nothing but good for this forum and it's members and I am nice and respectful to everyone until they cross lines and break rules.I am not here to change anyone's mind on anything as I do not wish mine to be changed by anyone else.
I knew it?No,I didn't I said what I thought.You quoted my post did you not?so yes,I thought it was directed at me.You quoted no one else so I personally don't think I am wrong for assuming that.
Excuse me??!!That's quite rude.I have not insisted on anything,I merely stated.No,I am not Deborah French.The only dealings with her I have had are via twitter and she is a non believer.She is also British...and an entireley other person.I did not 'disrespect you AT ALL.I actually said TWICE I valued your opinions.
that comment was not written to intimidate ANYONE.I do nothing but good for this forum and it's members and I am nice and respectful to everyone until they cross lines and break rules.I am not here to change anyone's mind on anything as I do not wish mine to be changed by anyone else.