0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: "Liberian Girl Heehee"I would suggest that we stick to the more palatable pieces of evidence, at least initially. There's at least 50+ good reasons why we think Michael is alive and hoaxed his death, without bringing up the NWO and Illuminati, doubles and numbers theories, etc. Definitely agree with this one. We can share the info we have found without bringing up NWO/illuminati and numerology of the hoax etc.
I would suggest that we stick to the more palatable pieces of evidence, at least initially. There's at least 50+ good reasons why we think Michael is alive and hoaxed his death, without bringing up the NWO and Illuminati, doubles and numbers theories, etc.
You all know I never ask permission to talk to the media about the hoax, and this time I won't either, because unless someone can show me that these people can't be trusted, I think this will be a great platform to get the story out there.
SD, you are again judging me before I have even voiced what I am planning to write. Besides that, I asked others to participate and I also said I would post it here first. Nowhere in this thread have I said that I am going to throw in the double theory or any other theory people do or do not agree on. In fact, I have not said anything at all about the content of the first article I want to write. Maybe you should hold your horses until you have read the draft. The only thing I have stated is that I do not have to ask permission to talk to any newspaper about the hoax, since we all (and therefore me as well) can do whatever we want. I never claimed to be a spokesperson for anyone and I will not speak for the members of this forum. Maybe you should wait with your judgement on me until you have read what I am about to write first.
Quote from: "~Souza~"SD, you are again judging me before I have even voiced what I am planning to write. Besides that, I asked others to participate and I also said I would post it here first. Nowhere in this thread have I said that I am going to throw in the double theory or any other theory people do or do not agree on. In fact, I have not said anything at all about the content of the first article I want to write. Maybe you should hold your horses until you have read the draft. The only thing I have stated is that I do not have to ask permission to talk to any newspaper about the hoax, since we all (and therefore me as well) can do whatever we want. I never claimed to be a spokesperson for anyone and I will not speak for the members of this forum. Maybe you should wait with your judgement on me until you have read what I am about to write first. No, This isn't me judging you at all. You have made it perfectly clear that you have decided to do this with or without our blessing. Since this is the case then as I said, I will no longer support this forum or you personally. If you want to write articles and publish them in this magazine, then you do so as yourself and keep the rest of us out of it. You do not speak for me, your views do not even reflect my own and you have a lot of nerve to say "what I am planning to write" and " I have not said anything at all about the content of the first article I want to write." This is telling us all that you have decided this and that you will be writing the articles maybe with some input from others on the content. It doesn't matter what the rest of us feel about this then. Well, no one crowned you Queen of the hoax community and you do not dictate to us.Well, say hello to Dutch Pearl Jr. unfreaken believable, use the material that the forum members have uncovered to write articles/book so a magazine/book can profit.And to think, I have been defending your ass on mjhd.net...perhaps I should be careful about whom I decide to back up.
Of course Souza, you can do whatever you like, and inkeeping with your claim not to be a spokesperson for anyone, I would like to ask that you make it clear in any articles you submit, that the views expressed are your own and not necessarily those of other hoax believers and especially not MJ's. I don't see how anyone can have a problem then.
Quote from: "curls"Of course Souza, you can do whatever you like, and inkeeping with your claim not to be a spokesperson for anyone, I would like to ask that you make it clear in any articles you submit, that the views expressed are your own and not necessarily those of other hoax believers and especially not MJ's. I don't see how anyone can have a problem then.Good idea. That way it clears us from any unnecessary drama that I already see is brewing.