The online People search!!!!

[steffymjlove]

Ok. I read up on the site blog. All of it was very quesionable, and many questions have arised. The part that really lit up for me (at that moment, because all of it just doesn't add up lol) was the people search online. I decided to do my own search on intelius. The ONLY name that came up for me (that was 52 years old, and had his mother, father, sister, and other familiar family member names )was "Michael Mr Jackson" !!!!!!

The ones listed with a "J" or "Joseph" as the middle name WERE NOT HIM!

This is getting crazier as the days go by....and I have attached a screen shot of the name from the database as proof.

Any one can look it up to verify its authenticity.

Just look up Michael Jackson in CA.

~~~Steffy~~~




~Truth4MJ~

[steffymjlove]

**NOTE**

There are 249 Michael Jacksons living in CA.

This is the only listed with his family members!

[MissG]

And, who is Marguerite?

[PeaceLoveHappiness]

And, who is Marguerite?

I think she is one of the people who claimed to be Michael's wife.

[steffymjlove]

I am not sure. BUT that's definitely 3 out of 4 names that we know for a fact ARE his family members. I did a search on  Marguerite Jackson, I know it may not have any relevance, but she was born in Indiana. Died in Delaware. Buried in a FOREST LAWN CEMETERY....  kinda weird huh?

I think I posted this thread in the right area of the forum.

This is definitely a inconsistency.

[steffymjlove]

**PLEASE TAKE NOTE**

I just did a random name search on "Marguerite Jackson"


These results could pertain to anyone by that name.
I just thought that I would share any findings with the forum.

Because the topic of the MJ name change is surely of interest..


~MJ Army~

``SteffyMJLove``

[steffymjlove]

Here is the original link, with Michael Mr Jackson listed as number 22.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


Please take notice that the search was done on "Michael J Jackson"....

[mjptd]

I have learned somewhere she was his grandmother

[steffymjlove]

That's the same thing that I was thinking.

Which makes more of this make sense!

Thank you so much for clearing this up

[steffymjlove]

look

[steffymjlove]

Here is the original link, with Michael Mr Jackson listed as number 22.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


Please take notice that the search was done on "Michael J Jackson"....

He's listed as 30 now....still the only one with those family members..

[Grace]

Why do you consider websites run by companies to be giving accurate data?
Same applies to authority websites in the U.S.
What is legal there is not legal everywhere in the world.

In Europe, there are laws in place that prohibit public distribution of personal data for safety and for privacy reasons. That's why facebook is under fire right now with legal suits - as is google streetview, "like buttons", google analytics, plugins for twitter and the list could go on and on. It is against law in Europe.

Why would a celebrity having the utmost interest in privacy but living in an environement of no safety and protection for private data NOT have the idea of spreading dummy informations in order to get even more fog out - just for being left alone?

First of all there are hundreds of Michael Jacksons in the U.S. and in California.
In imdb.com database for movies you will find 32 Michael Jacksons having contributed to movies. We don't even know if the published birthday and all other personal data are correct - how for heaven's sake do we want to find any reliable data on a person under those conditions?
The more given the fact that most websites are aiming in making $$$ with the database - they will put into it anything they could sell, be it right or not.

I don't think for a second that anything in public records in the web does correspond to the truth about the Michael Jackson we think of - the more as this Michael Jackson was trimmed into a brand.

[RunFaYaLife]

Yeah that sounds pretty odd.
wrong date of birth
wrong income
wrong age on the '30's"

When we use a data base in the states we do not use "Mr"
and I doubt that it would let anyone look up celebrities.
Some seedy sites might but it would cost big bucks...
and at that it may not be correct.

[steffymjlove]

Why do you consider websites run by companies to be giving accurate data?
Same applies to authority websites in the U.S.
What is legal there is not legal everywhere in the world.

In Europe, there are laws in place that prohibit public distribution of personal data for safety and for privacy reasons. That's why face book is under fire right now with legal suits - as is Google street-view, "like buttons", Google analytics, plug ins for twitter and the list could go on and on. It is against law in Europe.

Why would a celebrity having the utmost interest in privacy but living in an environment of no safety and protection for private data NOT have the idea of spreading dummy informations in order to get even more fog out - just for being left alone?

First of all there are hundreds of Michael Jacksons in the U.S. and in California.
In imdb.com database for movies you will find 32 Michael Jacksons having contributed to movies. We don't even know if the published birthday and all other personal data are correct - how for heaven's sake do we want to find any reliable data on a person under those conditions?
The more given the fact that most websites are aiming in making $$$ with the database - they will put into it anything they could sell, be it right or not.

I don't think for a second that anything in public records in the web does correspond to the truth about the Michael Jackson we think of - the more as this Michael Jackson was trimmed into a brand.

I just found it a topic of interest.

I was updating a previous thread that was already posted.


Oh I went through your post and corrected the typos.

[Grace]

txs, any of them are for free    you may keep them