Dr. Conrad Murray Pleads Not Guilty in MJ Death

[fordtocarr]

This article on Yahoo news,  You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
A HUGE clue to me in all this is the defense statement: " Asked why the defense wants to begin the trial so quickly, Chernoff said, "Dr. Murray has been waiting 22 months for his opportunity to do this. It's the first chance we have to force the issue."
We are NOW at exactly 19 months!!  NOT 22 months.  And he said the doctor HAS BEEN WAITING, not will have been waiting by THAT time, if he meant by March 25th.  Besides, March 25th will be 21 months exactly.  AGAIN.  Not correct.  So, how could have Murray been waiting since March 25, 2009 for this trial?  And that means when the trial begins, it will have been EXACTLY 2 YEARS TO THE DATE that Murray has been waiting for it to begin.  Now, when people throw around time, they say "about" or an obscure time as, "a year and a half" so we know it's time either way.  But, a specific time as in a month, being 22 of them!!  
I wonder if that was when, to the month, that Murray heard his part in the plan for a trial.  I wonder when he was hired for the TII concerts....I'm excited, because that was QUITE a mistake or certainty a clue...but it comes from the defense!! )))

[ignisaeternus]

A dear friend just reminded me that Bunnies (Rabbits) stand for rebirth....

And since it is the year of the rabbit- that sure is a nice thought...

[heisinme09]

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I feel that Conrad Murray's declaration before pleading Not Guilty...."Your Honor...I Am An Innocent Man" seemed VERY SCRIPTED.....like he had been told to be sure to get that in there....I feel it MUST have something to do with Michael's handwritten note in the link above....how much more obvious can this get, I ask you?

[bec]

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I feel that Conrad Murray's declaration before pleading Not Guilty...."Your Honor...I Am An Innocent Man" seemed VERY SCRIPTED.....like he had been told to be sure to get that in there....I feel it MUST have something to do with Michael's handwritten note in the link above....how much more obvious can this get, I ask you?

That's a very good connection.

[curls]

This article on Yahoo news,  You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
A HUGE clue to me in all this is the defense statement: " Asked why the defense wants to begin the trial so quickly, Chernoff said, "Dr. Murray has been waiting 22 months for his opportunity to do this. It's the first chance we have to force the issue."
We are NOW at exactly 19 months!!  NOT 22 months.  And he said the doctor HAS BEEN WAITING, not will have been waiting by THAT time, if he meant by March 25th.  Besides, March 25th will be 21 months exactly.  AGAIN.  Not correct.  So, how could have Murray been waiting since March 25, 2009 for this trial?  And that means when the trial begins, it will have been EXACTLY 2 YEARS TO THE DATE that Murray has been waiting for it to begin.  Now, when people throw around time, they say "about" or an obscure time as, "a year and a half" so we know it's time either way.  But, a specific time as in a month, being 22 of them!!  
I wonder if that was when, to the month, that Murray heard his part in the plan for a trial.  I wonder when he was hired for the TII concerts....I'm excited, because that was QUITE a mistake or certainty a clue...but it comes from the defense!! )))

fordtocarr, I like your thinking! I heard this 22 months statement but was just coming in the room as he said it and wasn't sure I'd heard correctly! For a lawyer, who is trained in pin-point accuracy, this was indeed a strange 'mistake' to make .... unless of course it was no mistake!

[GINAFELICIA]

So we have a rabbit in the courtroom, this is the year of the rabbit and Marlon twitted that this year will bring us peace and joy...... reloaded, ok, let's give it another try  :roll:

[ignisaeternus]

This article on Yahoo news,  You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
We are NOW at exactly 19 months!!  NOT 22 months.  And he said the doctor HAS BEEN WAITING, not will have been waiting by THAT time, if he meant by March 25th.  Besides, March 25th will be 21 months exactly.  AGAIN.  Not correct.  

Your post made me run to the calendar: Guess what?  22 months would put us at April 25th.  April 25th is Easter Monday this year.  More bunnies, anyone?   :lol: Resurrection? Hm...

Also, I looked at moonphases: Monday April 25th is start of last quarter moon (close to midnight- new moon?).

[GINAFELICIA]

This article on Yahoo news,  You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
We are NOW at exactly 19 months!!  NOT 22 months.  And he said the doctor HAS BEEN WAITING, not will have been waiting by THAT time, if he meant by March 25th.  Besides, March 25th will be 21 months exactly.  AGAIN.  Not correct.  

Your post made me run to the calendar: Guess what?  22 months would put us at April 25th.  April 25th is Easter Monday this year.  More bunnies, anyone?   :lol: Resurrection? Hm...

Also, I looked at moonphases: Monday April 25th is start of last quarter moon (close to midnight- new moon?).

Indeed the Easter this year is on April 24.
If I remember well there were supositions about the last easter as well but........nothing happened.
Of course this doesn't mean it could not happen this year.
I worked for a crazy Virgo boss a few years ago and I'll remember for all my life what he did to us:

He invited us to a meeting and he didn't show himself, making us waiting for him for 3 hours but I suspected he was watching our reactions with a camera or something.
Next week he invited us again to a meeting and of course we were there at the planned hour but he wasn't. I was getting really nervous and even angry with him, I was sure he won't come, just like the previous time. But he did came 1 hour and a half later......so the first time we were very surprised he didn't come and the second time we were surprised he came.

I hope Michael will do the same and come back when we'll realy think he will never come back .

[Ijustcantstoplovingu]

A dear friend just reminded me that Bunnies (Rabbits) stand for rebirth....

 
edit. . deleted someone else posted my comment  :lol:

Blessings

 

[Ijustcantstoplovingu]

Did anyone find it odd that in the video the Judge referes to Michael as ......  Michael Joseph Jackson a HUMAN BEING just a strange way to phrase it, do they try other than people, maybe Mr Bugs Bunny  A RABBIT! :lol:       Is this the normal way they address people in american courts?

[GINAFELICIA]

Did anyone find it odd that in the video the Judge referes to Michael as ......  Michael Joseph Jackson a HUMAN BEING just a strange way to phrase it, do they try other than people, maybe Mr Bugs Bunny  A RABBIT! :lol:       Is this the normal way they address people in american courts?

I don't know but I think I've heard it before somewhere....maybe it was in a movie....

[ignisaeternus]

I think it's legalese as in manslaughter and homicide it has to be legally established that the victim was a human being.

[voiceforthesilent]

Can anyone figure out what the sign on the wall says? I can't make it out.

Blessings

[curls]

Does anyone know if we will actually hear Murray speaking in court or will everything be done through his lawyers?  I don't know normal protocol in cases like this.

[curls]

Did anyone find it odd that in the video the Judge referes to Michael as ......  Michael Joseph Jackson a HUMAN BEING just a strange way to phrase it, do they try other than people, maybe Mr Bugs Bunny  A RABBIT! :lol:       Is this the normal way they address people in american courts?

Souza addresses this 'human being' thing in her 'monkey business' thread.