Michael Jackson hearing: Paramedic had 'gut feeling' Dr. Conrad Murray wasn't telling truth
January 5, 2011 | 3:27 pm
A paramedic who was called to the scene of Michael Jackson's final moments testified Wednesday that he had a "gut feeling" the singer's physician was not telling the truth as emergency personnel worked to revive the pop icon.
Richard Senneff, who has worked for the Los Angeles Fire Department for 25 years, said that when he arrived at Jackson's rented Holmby Hills home, Dr. Conrad Murray told him Jackson's condition had "just happened."
Yet based on the performer's dilated pupils, dry eyes and his skin, which was cold to the touch, Senneff believed Jackson may have been dead for more than 20 minutes, the paramedic said.
"All I can tell you is my gut feeling at the time was this did not just happen, it's been a period of time," Senneff testified in a hearing being held to determine whether Murray should stand trial in Jackson's death.
Senneff said other things Murray told him did not seem to add up: that Jackson had no underlying condition and was just being treated for dehydration, and that the only medication he had been given was the sedative lorazepam.
Even when pressed repeatedly about what medication Jackson had been given, Murray never mentioned the powerful anesthetic that was eventually determined to have caused the singer's death.
"At that time or any time, did Dr. Murray tell you he'd given the patient propofol?" Deputy Dist. Atty. David Walgren asked.
"No, sir," Senneff responded.
Senneff testified that he initially thought Jackson was a hospice patient because he appeared pale and underweight, with an IV stand and a personal physician at his bedside.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/01/michael-jackson-hearing-paramedic-had-gut-feeling-dr-conrad-murray-not-telling-truth.html
There's more of his testimony in this article than TMZ's.
The IV stand makes an appearance here but it still isn't in the AR.
If he was cold to the touch etc. then why was he removed from the scene?
This is not proper protocol when someone is dead at the scene.
Why was he loaded into the ambulance?
Protocol is to leave the body at the scene, contact police and/or the coroner.
Why were resuscitation efforts restarted once he was in the ambulance?
And why would those efforts have continued at the hospital?
And how is it possible that UCLA reports that they did get his heart going again but that he was unable to maintain or sustain a rhythm?