0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
To me this video confirms my beliefs that Malachi played a good part on this Cd.Monster Breaking News Keep Your Head Up...and maybe much more...Katherine was right.
What do you guys think? What we should do now? SONY clearly states that all tracks on "Michael" ARE indeed performed by Michael Jackson -- see the back of the cover of your CD! It's written on the cover.Should we undertake some steps -- as fans who feel that they are being deceived? :? Could our ears be the sufficient proof?Or should we leave it as it is??
Quote from: "VeryLittleSusie"What do you guys think? What we should do now? SONY clearly states that all tracks on "Michael" ARE indeed performed by Michael Jackson -- see the back of the cover of your CD! It's written on the cover.Should we undertake some steps -- as fans who feel that they are being deceived? :? Could our ears be the sufficient proof?Or should we leave it as it is??Unless you have definitive proof that those songs aren't Michael (which you do not), you would be wasting your time and money trying to do anything about it. Aside from the fact that Sony has been in business far too long to knowingly commit fraud, they have experts backing up their claims, as well as sworn documents from Frank Cascio. If you are that upset about the album, maybe you should sit it aside for a while and listen to some of the older albums that you know are Michael.
Quote from: "PeaceLoveHappiness"Quote from: "VeryLittleSusie"What do you guys think? What we should do now? SONY clearly states that all tracks on "Michael" ARE indeed performed by Michael Jackson -- see the back of the cover of your CD! It's written on the cover.Should we undertake some steps -- as fans who feel that they are being deceived? :? Could our ears be the sufficient proof?Or should we leave it as it is??Unless you have definitive proof that those songs aren't Michael (which you do not), you would be wasting your time and money trying to do anything about it. Aside from the fact that Sony has been in business far too long to knowingly commit fraud, they have experts backing up their claims, as well as sworn documents from Frank Cascio. If you are that upset about the album, maybe you should sit it aside for a while and listen to some of the older albums that you know are Michael.What if justice has to be done here too? what if Michael wants us to uncover their faces?
Quote from: "Le Papillon Bleu"Quote from: "PeaceLoveHappiness"Quote from: "VeryLittleSusie"What do you guys think? What we should do now? SONY clearly states that all tracks on "Michael" ARE indeed performed by Michael Jackson -- see the back of the cover of your CD! It's written on the cover.Should we undertake some steps -- as fans who feel that they are being deceived? :? Could our ears be the sufficient proof?Or should we leave it as it is??Unless you have definitive proof that those songs aren't Michael (which you do not), you would be wasting your time and money trying to do anything about it. Aside from the fact that Sony has been in business far too long to knowingly commit fraud, they have experts backing up their claims, as well as sworn documents from Frank Cascio. If you are that upset about the album, maybe you should sit it aside for a while and listen to some of the older albums that you know are Michael.What if justice has to be done here too? what if Michael wants us to uncover their faces?It's all in what you believe. I think Michael hoaxed his death for serious, life-threatening reasons, so I don't think he is just trying to uncover fraudulent producers at Sony. If that is the case, why would he allow his voice to be on a "tainted" album at all? I respect your theory, but I just don't agree with it.
Quote from: "PeaceLoveHappiness"Quote from: "Le Papillon Bleu"Quote from: "PeaceLoveHappiness"Quote from: "VeryLittleSusie"What do you guys think? What we should do now? SONY clearly states that all tracks on "Michael" ARE indeed performed by Michael Jackson -- see the back of the cover of your CD! It's written on the cover.Should we undertake some steps -- as fans who feel that they are being deceived? :? Could our ears be the sufficient proof?Or should we leave it as it is??Unless you have definitive proof that those songs aren't Michael (which you do not), you would be wasting your time and money trying to do anything about it. Aside from the fact that Sony has been in business far too long to knowingly commit fraud, they have experts backing up their claims, as well as sworn documents from Frank Cascio. If you are that upset about the album, maybe you should sit it aside for a while and listen to some of the older albums that you know are Michael.What if justice has to be done here too? what if Michael wants us to uncover their faces?It's all in what you believe. I think Michael hoaxed his death for serious, life-threatening reasons, so I don't think he is just trying to uncover fraudulent producers at Sony. If that is the case, why would he allow his voice to be on a "tainted" album at all? I respect your theory, but I just don't agree with it.I'm not saying he faked his death to uncover Sony no no no..
Hmm... Thank you all for your opinions. I just wanted to say the following: if sb was able to prove that these tracks are fake - it would be a proof that MJ was murdered and SONY is selling fake tracks to make money. Or at least, we would be a step closer to that... Of course, I believe that MJ is alive but... you know what I mean...We're here to find the truth - no matter what the truth is...
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginLFOLow-frequency oscillation (LFO) is an electronic signal, usually below 20 Hz, that creates a rhythmic pulse or sweep, often used to create vibrato, tremolo and other effects. The abbreviation is also often used to refer to low-frequency oscillators themselves. In certain genres of electronic music, the LFO filter's cutoff is used to create a wider range of, often darker, sound.Imitative synthesisSound synthesis can be used to mimic acoustic sound sources. The characteristics of a sound, known as pitch and timbre, are defined by the amplitude and pitch of each individual sine wave, collectively known as the partials or harmonics. Generally, a sound that does not change over time will include a fundamental partial or harmonic, and any number of partials. Synthesis may attempt to mimic the amplitude and pitch of the partials in an acoustic sound source.When natural sounds are analyzed in the frequency domain (as on a spectrum analyzer), the spectra of their sounds will exhibit amplitude spikes at each of the fundamental tone's harmonics corresponding to resonant properties of the instruments (spectral peaks that are also referred to as formants). Some harmonics may have higher amplitudes than others. The specific set of harmonic-vs-amplitude pairs is known as a sound's harmonic content. A synthesized sound requires accurate reproduction of the original sound in both the frequency domain and the time domain. A sound does not necessarily have the same harmonic content throughout the duration of the sound. Typically, high-frequency harmonics will die out more quickly than the lower harmonics.
Just putting out my theory. What do you think?QuoteYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginLFOLow-frequency oscillation (LFO) is an electronic signal, usually below 20 Hz, that creates a rhythmic pulse or sweep, often used to create vibrato, tremolo and other effects. The abbreviation is also often used to refer to low-frequency oscillators themselves. In certain genres of electronic music, the LFO filter's cutoff is used to create a wider range of, often darker, sound.Imitative synthesisSound synthesis can be used to mimic acoustic sound sources. The characteristics of a sound, known as pitch and timbre, are defined by the amplitude and pitch of each individual sine wave, collectively known as the partials or harmonics. Generally, a sound that does not change over time will include a fundamental partial or harmonic, and any number of partials. Synthesis may attempt to mimic the amplitude and pitch of the partials in an acoustic sound source.When natural sounds are analyzed in the frequency domain (as on a spectrum analyzer), the spectra of their sounds will exhibit amplitude spikes at each of the fundamental tone's harmonics corresponding to resonant properties of the instruments (spectral peaks that are also referred to as formants). Some harmonics may have higher amplitudes than others. The specific set of harmonic-vs-amplitude pairs is known as a sound's harmonic content. A synthesized sound requires accurate reproduction of the original sound in both the frequency domain and the time domain. A sound does not necessarily have the same harmonic content throughout the duration of the sound. Typically, high-frequency harmonics will die out more quickly than the lower harmonics. I apologize that I am not a techno-savvy person, but this is important I feel. So if there is somebody out there who knows this field could you please put this information in this wiki-site in layman's terms especially the parts that pertain to morphing human voice to sound like another person's, in tone and vibrato. I have also included all the pics in the HMH video that are related to sound technology to see if this techno person relates any of it to this as well. My theory is that Michael is deliberately imitating this Jason Malachi's voice to create controversy (what TR said he lives for). I believe it is still MJ's voice, and that's why the credits list him only, not this Jason Malachi, who may or may not be aware of what is going on. I think the same thing is happening with Conrad Murray, Dave Dave, and other characters we've been discussing and confused over. MJ has, at times, donned the fatsuit, and completely copied them in voice, mannerism, personality. Remember MJ said his favorite character was Morph, because he could change at will into anybody whenever he wanted to. This Master Entertainer is pulling out all the stops on this Hoax/Thriller/Extravaganza of a life-time/millenium/longer. If Jason is aware, then Michael trusts him and has included him in on the plot and will reward him handsomely. I truly believe TR is telling the truth on Oprah for the world to hear, and the Jackson's are telling the truth as pertains to the appearance of the truth--there-in lies the beauty of this lie that becomes the truth. I truly believe this in my gut/heart. Also does anyone have anymore pics to compare or add to these of pics elsewhere generally in the hoax? Here are the pics in HMH as far as I could see. I realize that HMH is clearly MJ's voice with Akon, but it is the lead single and only video representing the album 'Michael'.[attachment=4:2p4wcubh]hmh tech 1.jpg[/attachment:2p4wcubh][attachment=3:2p4wcubh]hmh tech 2.jpg[/attachment:2p4wcubh][attachment=2:2p4wcubh]hmh tech 3.jpg[/attachment:2p4wcubh][attachment=1:2p4wcubh]hmh tech 4.jpg[/attachment:2p4wcubh][attachment=0:2p4wcubh]hmh tech 5.jpg[/attachment:2p4wcubh]