0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I noticed the threads being locked, and yes, the topics got out of hands. [judgemental mode on]I support the idea to open new threads questioning what is "so funny or interesting" in playing with people. And, btw, What a botched job once again! Looks like a kindergarden full of wanna be intelligent manipulators and psycho wanna be with no insight at all.[judgemental mode off]To be honest, looks like we accept all this junk drama because we hope that MJ is behind all of this and being alive and still, after more than a year, shady characters come up.And Gina, no, we do not know Michael at all, we just know who he was observing his speeches, as the whole world did, but I can say loudly that I doubt that Michael was a bad person with twisted intentions.
Quote from: "Gema"I noticed the threads being locked, and yes, the topics got out of hands. [judgemental mode on]I support the idea to open new threads questioning what is "so funny or interesting" in playing with people. And, btw, What a botched job once again! Looks like a kindergarden full of wanna be intelligent manipulators and psycho wanna be with no insight at all.[judgemental mode off]To be honest, looks like we accept all this junk drama because we hope that MJ is behind all of this and being alive and still, after more than a year, shady characters come up.And Gina, no, we do not know Michael at all, we just know who he was observing his speeches, as the whole world did, but I can say loudly that I doubt that Michael was a bad person with twisted intentions.Well, that's a bit harsh to judge T.S. that way ...........
Quote from: "keyboardwizz"Quote from: "Gema"I noticed the threads being locked, and yes, the topics got out of hands. [judgemental mode on]I support the idea to open new threads questioning what is "so funny or interesting" in playing with people. And, btw, What a botched job once again! Looks like a kindergarden full of wanna be intelligent manipulators and psycho wanna be with no insight at all.[judgemental mode off]To be honest, looks like we accept all this junk drama because we hope that MJ is behind all of this and being alive and still, after more than a year, shady characters come up.And Gina, no, we do not know Michael at all, we just know who he was observing his speeches, as the whole world did, but I can say loudly that I doubt that Michael was a bad person with twisted intentions.Well, that's a bit harsh to judge T.S. that way ........... Well, that´s a bit too quick thinking my post was talking about TS...
Quote from: "Gema"Quote from: "keyboardwizz"Quote from: "Gema"I noticed the threads being locked, and yes, the topics got out of hands. [judgemental mode on]I support the idea to open new threads questioning what is "so funny or interesting" in playing with people. And, btw, What a botched job once again! Looks like a kindergarden full of wanna be intelligent manipulators and psycho wanna be with no insight at all.[judgemental mode off]To be honest, looks like we accept all this junk drama because we hope that MJ is behind all of this and being alive and still, after more than a year, shady characters come up.And Gina, no, we do not know Michael at all, we just know who he was observing his speeches, as the whole world did, but I can say loudly that I doubt that Michael was a bad person with twisted intentions.Well, that's a bit harsh to judge T.S. that way ........... Well, that´s a bit too quick thinking my post was talking about TS... Yep! It never crossed my mind either! Strange! I must be lacking the required pre-requisites to perform multi-contextual research!With L.O.V.E
Thank you Souza.I rest again peacefully.
by trustno1 » Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:09 am I agree with those points michaelsupporter but how can any of those arguing prove their version is the correct one? And how can the truth ever really be known when we're talking about private discussions between individuals, we're back to the whole "he said, she said" thing. Certain decisions were made by certain people about what we would be told and how, and I don't know if confidence can ever really be restored when we know that this became less an investigation site and more a mind-manipulation exercise. If indeed there is now a forum hoax going on then I'm already very bored with it, it's nowhere near as fascinating or exciting as the actual hoax (sorry to the "players" if that's what they are but it is boring!). Thankfully we have plenty of members who are here for the right reasons and who have retained their sense of humour and common sense. A lot of people might be worried about the site folding, that doesn't mean we stop believing in the hoax and it doesn't mean we can't find each other elsewhere and keep the investigation going. All this bad feeling is poisonous and I have no idea what new people visiting the site must think at the behaviour on display. I personally find the hypocrisy of certain members disgraceful. No matter how many threads are locked these discussions and this mistrust isn't going to go away. You reap what you sow as they say.
by keyboardwizz » Thu Dec 09, 2010 4:35 am This experience foremost showed me how clues are interpreted, sometimes I tweeted something and I would read explanations I never thought of, and those where just single words sended in cyberspace. I even was analyzed by someone and most of the meanings he/she gave to the tweets where totally off........ I even think there is a posibility that some of my "followers" still believe that I'm Michael even after my revelation, and what shocked me even more is how people confuse assumtions and facts. I firmly believe in the power of words and think a lot of "secrets "in this world can be unveiled by going back to the true origin of those words. Sadly nowadays the world is lost in translation...So it did shed a different light on T.S. , because he even took it a step further by re-directing to posts of members here by which he literally is directing the things we should look into. So I'm not calling him a fraud or anything, but his redirects are in no way a proof that Michael is alive.So his intentions or validity can only be proven after a revelation or BAM.For me personally there still isn't any solid evidence that Michael is alive, but no evidence he's dead either, so I'm totally with you : 5050
It's amazing how we are so open to believe MJ faked his death, but so reluctant to believe the mental and psychological "machinery" that could have leaded to such an extraordinary possible hoax.......I would like to ask everybody a question: do you think we made any progress in discovering the man we never knew?
Are you saying Michael's behind it?
Gema wrote: TS <-> TMZ? TS <-> Huffington Post?TS <-> Sony?
The site isn't going anywhere. Don't worry. It's fate rests in hands higher then Admin and it's future, and that of our work, is guaranteed .It's all good. Deep breaths all around.
The site isn't going anywhere. Don't worry. It's fate rests in hands higher then Admin and it's future, and that of our work, is guaranteed.It's all good. Deep breaths all around.
Quote from: "MJonmind"Are you saying Michael's behind it?No. Not at all. Not even a little bit. That would be fun, but no, that's not what I'm saying.