0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
@puff, the sources for the blogs are anything on the net OTHER than anonymous people. The sources are articles, books, websites etc. and were written after it was researched for weeks. Not because an anonymous person or TS said it was true. If none of it would have made sense, I would have never posted any of it. I have discussed the fact that we could have been fooled many times with Mo and I always kept that possibility open but until this day nothing has convinced me that his words were for another purpose than simply to inform and the same goes for TS. If both are frauds and someone can show me, that's fine. But as long as I have questions that can't be answered I am entitled to have another opinion than you have. You weren't there and you also know one side of the story so what surprises me is how you only agree with Mo in anything she says, and you are not open at all to anything I say. Isn't that a little strange when you say that everything needs to be investigated? Wouldn't it in that case be logic if you also contacted me about the issue? Most definitely when you see I disagree. That should make you, as an investigator, curious as to why I still stand by my points. You are in my MSN list, so it's easy to contact me. But as long as you will dismiss anything I say, I don't see the need in arguing any longer.
We can only make assumptions and suppositions but we should not act like what we preach is the truth, because only one person here knows that truth and it's Michael Jackson himself...
I hope this time your offer of a truce is accepted Souza but considering you already tried to make peace and things turned even nastier I would be surprised if you get a positive response. We do appreciate you trying though, it would be nice to have some harmony again even if it's just you guys being civil to each other and not actually friendly.
Souza: Mo, I already posted in another thread that I respect you as an admin of this board and as an investigator. I think we should make a truce. We clearly disagree on a lot and that is ok. I don't see why that should give problems. You are allowed to voice your opinion, but you should also allow me and others to question your findings. Same goes the other way around. I apologize I attacked you personally, I shouldn't have done that and I should have stayed with the subject. I admitted that was wrong already in the thread, but hereby again in this one. Things are changed and you and I will not have the same relationship as we had before, but I think, as we are both adults, that we could at least try to treat each other better from now on. I can let this all behind me without grudge and I hope you will be able to do the same, so that we can continue this site we both worked so hard for the past year. It also is not fair towards the members if we would let this escalade until the forum is dead. It's a year of investigation by so many members and it would be a shame to let that all die.