0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Sorry but i don't get it.MJ was already declared dead on april 2009.i am sure that Sony planned the release of "Michael" the day after he "died", so this article could mean anything.The fact that he is talkin about MJ in present tense could be a mistake or maybe this article was copied from an older one.Could you explain your point better please?
Quote from: "giannip"Sorry but i don't get it.MJ was already declared dead on april 2009.i am sure that Sony planned the release of "Michael" the day after he "died", so this article could mean anything.The fact that he is talkin about MJ in present tense could be a mistake or maybe this article was copied from an older one.Could you explain your point better please?
Quote from: "chloead505"Quote from: "giannip"Sorry but i don't get it.MJ was already declared dead on april 2009.i am sure that Sony planned the release of "Michael" the day after he "died", so this article could mean anything.The fact that he is talkin about MJ in present tense could be a mistake or maybe this article was copied from an older one.Could you explain your point better please?Lol, I have the exact same reaction! Why April 2009? :?
Quote from: "iMISSYOUMJ"Quote from: "chloead505"Quote from: "giannip"Sorry but i don't get it.MJ was already declared dead on april 2009.i am sure that Sony planned the release of "Michael" the day after he "died", so this article could mean anything.The fact that he is talkin about MJ in present tense could be a mistake or maybe this article was copied from an older one.Could you explain your point better please?Lol, I have the exact same reaction! Why April 2009? :?the article was written on april 2009You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I did a mistake before and got confused with dates But my point is still there: didn't we already knew an album was in the making? I mean we obviously had no tracklist for that album and the tracks that Michael planned for the upcoming release could be different from those now present in "Michael".I don't want to offend anyone but i don't think this article proves that "Michael" was planned by MJ as it is.
Good discovery. But the Jacksons, children, Karen try to object the album, authenticity of Michael singing songs. Then what does that mean? Go & figure.