Quote from: "icebluestarlight"Looks like it was planned after the death see report from reuters
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5 ... 22&sp=true
Wohoo! You're right, based on that article it seems that the exhibition was planned after "death".
From the article, "Also on Friday, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mitchell Beckloff approved a deal between executors of Jackson's 2002 will and concert promoter AEG Live for a traveling exhibition of Jackson memorabilia over the family's objections."
I just came from another thread in which some members in the UK have attended the exhibition and said that there are memorial books there for guests to sign. The memorial books are supposed to go to the family at the end of the exhibition tour. What confuses me is that if the family had objections about the exhibitions as stated in the above article, then does it really make sense to send the memory books to the family? If I were part of the family and was objecting to the exhibition for the reasons stated in the article, I would be insulted if I got these memory books from the exhibition handlers. It's like they were laughing in my face because they got what they wanted despite my wishes and the memory books were a testimony to that. That's just my opinion, though.
This leads me to believe that either the family was not really opposing the exhibition tour, contrary to what the article says, or the family wanted the public to believe that they objected to the exhibition as a distraction.
Now back to Miko's note to Michael. I said that I would be fairly convinced that Miko wrote that note to a living Michael if I knew that the exhibition was planned after June 25th. If I put my faith in that article then I'm pretty satisfied for now, thanks Icebluestarlight.