0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
This picture mainly got me thinking he has a twin:Idk, the pictures look like 2 different people, but the facial features are too similar to be a double, imo.
Quote from: "MJFAN7"This picture mainly got me thinking he has a twin:Idk, the pictures look like 2 different people, but the facial features are too similar to be a double, imo.Two different pictures, slightly different expressions and obvious contrasting and brightness changes. The reason you see a cleft in the pic to the left is because the contrast was turned up which is obvious when viewing the 2 shirts. The pic on the right shows hardly any cleft because the brightness was turned up and some brushing had to have gone on with the uneven skin tones and the the look being a little cloudy.
Quote from: "nWo"Quote from: "MJFAN7"This picture mainly got me thinking he has a twin:Idk, the pictures look like 2 different people, but the facial features are too similar to be a double, imo.Two different pictures, slightly different expressions and obvious contrasting and brightness changes. The reason you see a cleft in the pic to the left is because the contrast was turned up which is obvious when viewing the 2 shirts. The pic on the right shows hardly any cleft because the brightness was turned up and some brushing had to have gone on with the uneven skin tones and the the look being a little cloudy.I forgot to mention that it was not just a little retouching(airbrushing). The picture on the right looks just exactly like the innocent boyish doll on the BAD album, which MJ SAID they had retouched. The reason it looks "cloudy", as you say, is because there are over ten thousand muscles of expression in the human face, and airbrushing irrespectfully paints over these, as if what they are telling is inconsequential, and fails to paint new believable subtle musculature there, in place of what was blotted out... The picture on the left was totally unretouched, and looks like a man 8-) . The real deal. Not bad at ALL, eh???