Illuminati House of Cards

[White_Orchid]

Wiki Leaks seek refuge on Swiss servers!  The US is hell bent to close down Wiki Leaks so this will be interesting to see if Swiss servers will function as sanctuary to those seeking neutral refuge on the world wide web.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Do you remember earlier discussions on US Senate Bills 773 and 778 which attempted to enable the US President to function as czar of the internet?  

 :!:

[paula-c]

Well now I think that maybe all these "leaks" were made for something ......

[White_Orchid]

Wiki Leaks fights for survival as Pay Pal cuts off donations link.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Yikes, this ping pong is like a tennis game!

Alternative to Pay Pal would be a good business opportunity for somebody!  

Message to Wiki, open a Swiss account to go with the Swiss servers!

 :arrow:

[White_Orchid]

Antecedent info-Michael Moore is a USA activist.  British court set bail, Moore paid it, the Swedes are fight the British courts to revoke the bail.

Moore explains; "Why I'm Posting Bail Money for Julian Assange" (A statement from Michael Moore)

Tuesday, December 14th, 2010

Friends,

Yesterday, in the Westminster Magistrates Court in London, the lawyers for WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange presented to the judge a document from me stating that I have put up $20,000 of my own money to help bail Mr. Assange out of jail.

Furthermore, I am publicly offering the assistance of my website, my servers, my domain names and anything else I can do to keep WikiLeaks alive and thriving as it continues its work to expose the crimes that were concocted in secret and carried out in our name and with our tax dollars.

We were taken to war in Iraq on a lie. Hundreds of thousands are now dead. Just imagine if the men who planned this war crime back in 2002 had had a WikiLeaks to deal with. They might not have been able to pull it off. The only reason they thought they could get away with it was because they had a guaranteed cloak of secrecy. That guarantee has now been ripped from them, and I hope they are never able to operate in secret again.

So why is WikiLeaks, after performing such an important public service, under such vicious attack? Because they have outed and embarrassed those who have covered up the truth. The assault on them has been over the top:

**Sen. Joe Lieberman says WikiLeaks "has violated the Espionage Act."

**The New Yorker's George Packer calls Assange "super-secretive, thin-skinned, [and] megalomaniacal."

**Sarah Palin claims he's "an anti-American operative with blood on his hands" whom we should pursue "with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders."

**Democrat Bob Beckel (Walter Mondale's 1984 campaign manager) said about Assange on Fox: "A dead man can't leak stuff ... there's only one way to do it: illegally shoot the son of a bitch."

**Republican Mary Matalin says "he's a psychopath, a sociopath ... He's a terrorist."

**Rep. Peter A. King calls WikiLeaks a "terrorist organization."

And indeed they are! They exist to terrorize the liars and warmongers who have brought ruin to our nation and to others. Perhaps the next war won't be so easy because the tables have been turned -- and now it's Big Brother who's being watched ... by us!

WikiLeaks deserves our thanks for shining a huge spotlight on all this. But some in the corporate-owned press have dismissed the importance of WikiLeaks ("they've released little that's new!") or have painted them as simple anarchists ("WikiLeaks just releases everything without any editorial control!"). WikiLeaks exists, in part, because the mainstream media has failed to live up to its responsibility. The corporate owners have decimated newsrooms, making it impossible for good journalists to do their job. There's no time or money anymore for investigative journalism. Simply put, investors don't want those stories exposed. They like their secrets kept ... as secrets.

I ask you to imagine how much different our world would be if WikiLeaks had existed 10 years ago. Take a look at this photo. That's Mr. Bush about to be handed a "secret" document on August 6th, 2001. Its heading read: "Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US." And on those pages it said the FBI had discovered "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings." Mr. Bush decided to ignore it and went fishing for the next four weeks.

But if that document had been leaked, how would you or I have reacted? What would Congress or the FAA have done? Was there not a greater chance that someone, somewhere would have done something if all of us knew about bin Laden's impending attack using hijacked planes?

But back then only a few people had access to that document. Because the secret was kept, a flight school instructor in San Diego who noticed that two Saudi students took no interest in takeoffs or landings, did nothing. Had he read about the bin Laden threat in the paper, might he have called the FBI? (Please read this essay by former FBI Agent Coleen Rowley, Time's 2002 co-Person of the Year, about her belief that had WikiLeaks been around in 2001, 9/11 might have been prevented.)

Or what if the public in 2003 had been able to read "secret" memos from Dick Cheney as he pressured the CIA to give him the "facts" he wanted in order to build his false case for war? If a WikiLeaks had revealed at that time that there were, in fact, no weapons of mass destruction, do you think that the war would have been launched -- or rather, wouldn't there have been calls for Cheney's arrest?

Openness, transparency -- these are among the few weapons the citizenry has to protect itself from the powerful and the corrupt. What if within days of August 4th, 1964 -- after the Pentagon had made up the lie that our ship was attacked by the North Vietnamese in the Gulf of Tonkin -- there had been a WikiLeaks to tell the American people that the whole thing was made up? I guess 58,000 of our soldiers (and 2 million Vietnamese) might be alive today.

Instead, secrets killed them.

For those of you who think it's wrong to support Julian Assange because of the sexual assault allegations he's being held for, all I ask is that you not be naive about how the government works when it decides to go after its prey. Please -- never, ever believe the "official story." And regardless of Assange's guilt or innocence (see the strange nature of the allegations here), this man has the right to have bail posted and to defend himself. I have joined with filmmakers Ken Loach and John Pilger and writer Jemima Khan in putting up the bail money -- and we hope the judge will accept this and grant his release today.

Might WikiLeaks cause some unintended harm to diplomatic negotiations and U.S. interests around the world? Perhaps. But that's the price you pay when you and your government take us into a war based on a lie. Your punishment for misbehaving is that someone has to turn on all the lights in the room so that we can see what you're up to. You simply can't be trusted. So every cable, every email you write is now fair game. Sorry, but you brought this upon yourself. No one can hide from the truth now. No one can plot the next Big Lie if they know that they might be exposed.

And that is the best thing that WikiLeaks has done. WikiLeaks, God bless them, will save lives as a result of their actions. And any of you who join me in supporting them are committing a true act of patriotism. Period.

I stand today in absentia with Julian Assange in London and I ask the judge to grant him his release. I am willing to guarantee his return to court with the bail money I have wired to said court. I will not allow this injustice to continue unchallenged.

Yours,
Michael Moore
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
MichaelMoore.com

P.S. You can read the statement I filed today in the London court here.

P.P.S. If you're reading this in London, please go support Julian Assange and WikiLeaks at a demonstration at 1 PM today, Tuesday the 14th, in front of the Westminster court.

[White_Orchid]

Last 2 minutes of video most interesting, wikileaks part of bigger media circus.  Basically, the author suggests that wikileaks is diversion and we should we keep our eyes on puppet masters behind the curtains.

No confirmation yet, but trail of bread crumbs are leading to hidden agenda of 'how-when' the US dollar will be dumped as the world currency.

Oil is a crucial commodity and thus is a good bread crumb trail to follow.

On one hand we have evidence suggesting that Haiti was HAARPed for its vast subterranean oil reserves. Recently, Obama has been cozying up with Chavez for Venezuela oil.
 
On the other hand, check out the growing close partnership between Russia and China; Putin has privately met the Chinese premier 7 times this year.  Russia pipeline is activated and Russian oil to China. China and Russia as business partners are using their own currencies instead of US dollars.

The video below is tongue-in-check jab at wikileaks.
[youtube:ruhaivc5]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TheJPboU4c&feature=player_embedded[/youtube:ruhaivc5]

[Grace]

No confirmation yet, but trail of bread crumbs are leading to hidden agenda of 'how-when' the US dollar will be dumped as the world currency.

We heard already the (distributed by classic media thus filtered) announcement of Assange that wikileaks wanted to publish documents concerning American banks in January.
Some may see this as the start signal for the elimination of the dollar and global deep economic crisis. Assange could very well be the fall guy in order to excuse what was planned and predictable since years. It is always risky to bind one name to a big event. wikileaks is more than Assange but he's the one in spotlight.

We got some weeks to get prepared, still. Try to figure out those behind the curtains.
Stay awake.

[MJonmind]

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

JEFF GATES : WIKILEAKS — THE TEL AVIV CONNECTION
Israeli psy-ops typically serve multiple purposes. Wikileaks is no exception.

By Jeff Gates

What is Tel Aviv to do now that it’s known Israelis and pro-Israelis ‘fixed’ the intelligence that induced the U.S. to war in Iraq?

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Con me consistently for six decades and the relationship is over, as is Israel’s credibility as a legitimate nation state.

Tel Aviv knows this. But what can the Zionist state do about it?

Answer: Wikileaks.

Why now? Misdirection.

Shine the spotlight on Washington to take it off Tel Aviv. That’s good old-fashioned psy-ops.  And challenge the credibility of the U.S. That’s Wikileaks.

Any credible forensics would start by asking: to whose benefit? Then look to means, motive and opportunity plus the presence of stable nation-state intelligence inside the U.S.

Other than Israel, who else is a credible candidate? Notice how quickly Israel’s role in the peace process vanished from the news. Now it’s Iran, Iran and more Iran. To whose benefit?

Tel Aviv knows that the phony intelligence on Iraq leads to those skilled at waging war “by way of deception”—the motto of the Israeli Mossad.

Wikileaks are noteworthy for what’s missing: the absence of any material damaging to Israeli goals.
But still Tel Aviv faces an unprecedented peril: transparency. Americans know they were duped. And Israel rightly fears that Americans will soon realize by whom.

Tepid Support will not Suffice

Obama has behaved as anticipated by those who produced his presidency. Anyone surprised at the lack of change in U.S. policy in the Middle East fails to grasp the power of the Israel lobby.

Did he hesitate to support their latest Israeli strategy for scuttling peace negotiations? Absent peace, the U.S. will continue to be the target of those outraged at America’s unflinching support for Israel’s thuggish behavior in pursuit of its expansionist goals.

Confirming the lobby’s influence, Netanyahu announced he would not agree to halt settlements on Palestinian land until Obama reduced to writing a $3 billion bribe.

In return for a proposed 90-day freeze, what form of bribe will America provide? Twenty F-35 jets at $150 million each plus parts, maintenance, training and armaments.

That’s $231 million per week or $1,373,626 per hour. What will the U.S. receive in return? A temporary partial freeze on settlements. How many more times can this ruse work?

Israel has evaded a peace agreement since it drove Palestinians from their land in 1948 and seized more land in 1967 to shape today’s geopolitics.

Should Israel reach an agreement with the Palestinians, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton proposes a “comprehensive security agreement.” At what cost no one knows. The U.S. Congress has already budgeted $30 billion for Israel over 10 years. This latest $3 billion is on top of that.

That doesn’t include the cost to American credibility posed by an offer to veto U.N. recognition of Palestine as a state. And a pledge Never Again to pressure Israel on settlements. Plus the freeze omits East Jerusalem where Tel Aviv insists on moving ahead with new housing starts.

Timing Is Everything

By scheduling its latest incursion into Gaza between Christmas 2008 and the January 2009 Obama inaugural, Tel Aviv ensured only muted opposition during political down time in the U.S. Thus it came as no surprise to see an agent provocateur operation on Thanksgiving Day 2010 as Israel demolished a West Bank Mosque and a Palestinian village.

After seven hours of nonstop talks, Hillary Clinton praised Netanyahu as a “peacemaker.” In return, he agreed only to “continue the process.” Meanwhile, U.S. elections marked a major victory for Israel when incoming Republican Majority Leader Eric Cantor, a Jewish Zionist, announced that the new majority would “serve as a check on the Obama administration.”

The Israel lobby has good reason to gloat. Confirming ongoing duplicity, Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman proclaimed: “a permanent agreement is impossible.”

Wikileaks’ release of confidential diplomatic cables provides Israel an opportunity to undermine U.S. relations worldwide while also inflicting lasting damage on U.S. interests in the Middle East. After this, what nation would trust the U.S. to maintain a confidence?

In October, Turkey asked that the U.S. not share intelligence with Israel. Now who dares share intelligence with the U.S.?

This may signal the beginning of the end for the Obama presidency his domestic policy failures are eclipsed by his failures in foreign policy.

This may also signal pre-staging for the 2012 presidential primary with a weakened Obama forced to name Clinton as his running mate or stepping aside so she can lead the ballot.

Her 2008 presidential campaign promised recognition of Israel as a “Jewish state” and promised an “undivided Jerusalem as the capital.” Tel Aviv was elated. A second Clinton presidency would ensure another victory for Israel—and no peace.

Israeli psy-ops typically serve multiple purposes. Wikileaks is no exception.

100% agree Sarahli. Strategy, while everyone scrambles to figured who did what to who. It's a similar story of who supposedly wasn't in the 911 buildings, and who were seen laughing while the buildings went down from across the river.

When I looked up the notorious Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the first many links concur that this writing is a fraud, dangerous lie and antisemitic. But is it? That International Jews are very quick to defensively say it's a lie.  Hmmm... Way down the list on google is this presentation, the contents of which many would say has accurately described the last over a hundred years of world history.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
An outline of the chapters is this:

WORLD CONQUEST THROUGH WORLD JEWISH GOVERNMENT

THE PROTOCOLS
OF THE LEARNED ELDERS
OF ZION
Visiting "The Protocols"

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 

Preface
Introduction
Who are the Elders?
Protocol I The Basic Doctrine
Protocol II Economic Wars
Protocol III Methods of Conquest
Protocol IV Materialism Replaces Religion
Protocol V Despotism and Modern Progress
Protocol VI Take-Over Technique
Protocol VII World-Wide Wars
Protocol VIII Provisional Government
Protocol IX Re-education
Protocol X Preparing for Power
Protocol XI The Totalitarian State
Protocol XII Control of the Press
Protocol XIII Distractions
Protocol XIV Assault on Religion
Protocol XV Ruthless Suppression
Protocol XVI Brainwashing
Protocol XVII Abuse of Authority
Protocol XVIII Arrest of Opponents
Protocol XIX Rulers and People
Protocol XX Financial Programme
Protocol XXI Loans and Credit
Protocol XXII Power of Gold
Protocol XXIII Instilling Obedience
Protocol XXIV Qualities of the Ruler

Here is one explaination of their origins:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Of the Protocols themselves little need be said in the way of introduction. The book in which they are embodied was first published in the year 1897 by Philip Stepanov for private circulation among his intimate friends. The first time Nilus published them was in 1901 in a book called The Great Within the Small and reprinted in 1905. A copy of this is in the British Museum bearing the date of its reception, August 10, 1906. All copies that were known to exist in Russia were destroyed in the Kerensky regime, and under his successors the possession of a copy by anyone in Soviet land was a crime sufficient to ensure the owner's of being shot on sight. The fact is in itself sufficient proof of the genuineness of the Protocols. The Jewish journals, of course, say that they are a forgery, leaving it to be understood that Professor Nilus, who embodied them in a work of his own, had concocted them for his own purposes.

My opinion: Obama was a puppet while someone/others pulled the strings. As they did Bush, Hitler, and a host of other greats that shaped our world. Have you heard of the name - Usrael ?

[White_Orchid]

You guys are on the right track, there is an Israel connection.. Assunge's right hand man is a dude named Israel Shamir.  Shamir and his father are notorious racists and deny the Holocaust.  Belfast head of Wikileaks denies 9/11 was inside job.  Denial to hide the Jew roots?

Shamir and Obama believe in the one-state solution to the Israeli-Palestine conflict.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

WikiLeaks May Employ an Anti-Semitic Holocaust Denier

WikiLeaks May Employ an Anti-Semitic Holocaust Denier

Reason magazine says it has confirmation from a WikiLeaks spokesperson that Israel Shamir, an anti-Semitic Russian-born resident of Sweden, is employed by WikiLeaks. Shamir, who also goes by the aliases Adam Ermash or Jöran Jermas, likes to write things like "Jews asked God to kill, destroy, humiliate, exterminate, defame, starve, impale Christians, to usher in Divine Vengeance and to cover God’s mantle with blood of goyim" on his website.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Israel Shamir From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Israel Shamir also known as Jöran Jermas (born 1947[1]) is a writer[2] and journalist. He is a commentator on Arab - Israeli relations and Jewish culture.[3][4][5] He is originally from Novosibirsk, Siberia and moved to Israel in 1969, served as paratrooper in the army and fought in the 1973 war. He took up journalism and writing in 1975.[6]

In February 2005 Labour life peer Nazir Ahmed held a book launch for Shamir in the House of Lords. According to Searchlight in 2004[7] and Stephen Pollard in The Times the following year[8] Shamir is Swedish writer Jöran Jermas. The writers of these articles allege he has connections to antisemitic publications and groups. Pollard calls him "rabid anti-Semite."[8]

We are getting closer to what is behind this curtain....
 :shock:

[White_Orchid]

Puppet Master has money, after release from bail, Assange will kick back in English manor.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

 :roll:

[Sarahli]

Thank you MJonmind. I also think that the Protocols are applied. Some people say that the Shoah has been elevated to the state of a religion. Nobody can ask questions without being labelled an anti-semite and it is against the law.... I am appaled by the silence of 'rational' people in key places who don't talk about these lies and all the others, and even go against their interests and the interests of their own country to perpetuate them. What is the force behind that silence? Money certainly is a part of the answer...

[White_Orchid]

Interesting,  dichotomy

Right Wing-Wikileaks Belfast owner denies holocaust, Assange's right hand mad Shamir denies 9/11 as inside CIA job
Left Wing- Tariq Ali supports Wikileaks release of information but declined comments on Belfast or Shamir, Tariq confirms that Assange is front man

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Tariq Ali-From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tariq Ali at Imperial College,
Born    21 October 1943 (1943-10-21) (age 67)
Lahore, British India
Nationality    British
Occupation    historian, novelist,activist
Political movement    New Left Review
Religion    None(Atheist)
Spouse    Susan Watkins

Tariq Ali (Punjabi, Urdu: طارق علی), born 21 October 1943, is a British Pakistani historian, novelist, filmmaker, political campaigner, and commentator.[1][2] He is a member of the editorial committee of the New Left Review and Sin Permiso, and regularly contributes to The Guardian, CounterPunch, and the London Review of Books.

He is the author of several books, including Can Pakistan Survive? The Death of a State (1991), Pirates Of The Caribbean: Axis Of Hope (2006), Conversations with Edward Said (2005), Bush in Babylon (2003), and Clash of Fundamentalisms: Crusades, Jihads and Modernity (2002), A Banker for All Seasons (2007), The Duel (2008) and The Obama Syndrome (2010).

[youtube:18lfabnn]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAzKlYPjSnU&feature=player_embedded#![/youtube:18lfabnn]

[White_Orchid]

Bingo.  

Please see link below, EU had new trade talks with countries around the world.  All countries currently in bi-lateral trade agreements, like EU and NAFTA, are talking now about tri-lateral trade agreements to ease economic crisis (countries going bankrupt). If these tri-lateral trade deals go through, it is big step towards One World Economy.

Wikileaks may be an Illuminati tool to speed up the process.  Wikileaks chaos cloaks the tri-lateral moves to One World Economy..  
 
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

 :shock:

[Sarahli]

WIKIpedia.... WIKIleaks... I wonder what's next....

[~Souza~]

WIKIpedia.... WIKIleaks... I wonder what's next....

WikiHoax?

[paula-c]

And think of this?



[youtube:3kswg967]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYWNb_apRPM&feature=player_embedded[/youtube:3kswg967]