0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

mjjammTopic starter

COULD IT REALLY BE HIM??%^^
November 20, 2010, 11:00:23 PM
[youtube:3dpwmck2]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiGzUBJZMpE[/youtube:3dpwmck2]

[youtube:3dpwmck2]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PJZoEppxa8&feature=related[/youtube:3dpwmck2]


Not saying I believe it's him, not saying I don't.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

mjjammTopic starter

Re: COULD IT REALLY BE HIM??%^^
November 20, 2010, 11:03:14 PM
lol
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: COULD IT REALLY BE HIM??%^^
November 21, 2010, 11:51:11 AM
It's him.
Sony gots hundreds of songs, voice extracts, demos, etc... of Michael Jackson, why would they put online, the first time after MJ's " Death" a song with not the real MJ on it... that's no sense...
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
" I'm going to shock the world, just watch. "

*

mjjammTopic starter

Re: COULD IT REALLY BE HIM??%^^
November 21, 2010, 12:53:52 PM
Quote from: "Cameron"
It's him.
Sony gots hundreds of songs, voice extracts, demos, etc... of Michael Jackson, why would they put online, the first time after MJ's " Death" a song with not the real MJ on it... that's no sense...


To backmail the fans that know the truth

IF you dont buy MJs album becuase it sound like Mj is not on it, it makes MJ look like he's now a flop and no one cares

IF you buy it they win their profits and everything they want. But you now have an album that might only be half of his voice.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

all4loveandbelieve

Re: COULD IT REALLY BE HIM??%^^
November 21, 2010, 02:10:18 PM
One thing puzzles me why would his family say it is not Michael singing. As we all know they are famished for Michael's money, if we don't buy the album they will not get any cuts. At times I feel it is Michael singing and at times I don't feel it. I hope this mystery will unsolve soon.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions


I'm happy to be alive, I'm happy to be who I am.
Michael Jackson

*

MissG

Re: COULD IT REALLY BE HIM??%^^
November 21, 2010, 02:14:48 PM
Quote from: "all4loveandbelieve"
One thing puzzles me why would his family say it is not Michael singing.

Imo, if the family denies that MJ is alive, ie, is not MJ´s voice, the family, once MJ comes back, will play the card of -"we did not know that MJ faked his death  :shock: " and will be free of judgement from the public.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
("Minkin güerveeeee")
Michael pls come back


"Why a four-year-old child could understand this hoax. Run out and find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head nor tail out of it"

*

nWo

Re: COULD IT REALLY BE HIM??%^^
November 21, 2010, 02:33:36 PM
It is him in the song. Why make a CD with Michael songs and have one song not be him? Not only is it stupid, it just doesn't make sense. Why release an albumed that would be blacklisted if it really wasn't him?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

MissG

Re: COULD IT REALLY BE HIM??%^^
November 21, 2010, 02:44:29 PM
Because once you write MJ+ breaking news in google, what comes up is the news of his death  :D
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
("Minkin güerveeeee")
Michael pls come back


"Why a four-year-old child could understand this hoax. Run out and find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head nor tail out of it"

Re: COULD IT REALLY BE HIM??%^^
November 21, 2010, 04:20:10 PM
...because it doesn't make sense for them to put out a CD with a fake on it. They'll lose credibility. Did I mention Michael owns a large chunk of Sony? Mike didn't have any beef with Sony, he had problems with Tommy Mottola (who is long gone now). I just don't understand the point of putting a fake out there. Everyone would lose money.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
June 25, 2009 - The Day I Woke Up

Re: COULD IT REALLY BE HIM??%^^
November 21, 2010, 07:56:41 PM
Quote from: "mjjamm"
lol

Why the LOL? Are you playing with us?

Okay...I personally think Michael is singing. I also think I hear another voice but I am sure (as much as anyone - LOL) that I hear Michael's voice. But, I stand by my belief that it's about the message. And, I'll stand by one of my favorite passages in the Bible that says (paraphrasing) that it doesn't matter who the messenger is as long as the truth be told. If it were just about the song then I'd be more concerned about it being Michael but I'm sure it's about the message so if Michael is there and there is also a second person, that is fine with me.

I think the truth is being told. The words are being released and people are hearing them. They are being forced to take a second look at what they believe and why. Why is it so hard to believe that he would fall in love? Great point....

I love the song, by the way.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
I'm proud to be a child of God and a member of MJ's Army of L.O.V.E.
 
"Press coverage of my life is like [watching] a fictitious movie...like watching science fiction. It's not true." ~Michael Jackson (2005)

"You should not believe everything you read. You are missing the most important revelations". Craig Harvey 3-15-2012

Re: COULD IT REALLY BE HIM??%^^
November 21, 2010, 09:47:53 PM
I think it's him I mean why put a fake on the song knowing that if  this goes to court and they prove that's it's fake they'll get in trouble.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal