0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: "PeaceLoveHappiness"I've never followed TS, but I find it quite interesting that suddenly after over a year and a half, this person would now claim that Michael has been murdered. If they really believe that, then why have they been leading people on all this time?TS never claimed Michael was murdered.
I've never followed TS, but I find it quite interesting that suddenly after over a year and a half, this person would now claim that Michael has been murdered. If they really believe that, then why have they been leading people on all this time?
Quote from: "PeaceLoveHappiness"I've never followed TS, but I find it quite interesting that suddenly after over a year and a half, this person would now claim that Michael has been murdered. If they really believe that, then why have they been leading people on all this time?TS never claimed Michael was murdered.Please read all parts of update #4, TS states his case about why it IS NOT murder.TIAI Update #4a: 777 + 999 = Greatest Proof Hoax, Not Murder You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginTIAI Update #4b: 777 + 999 = Greatest Proof Hoax, Not Murder You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginTIAI Update #4c: 777 + 999 = Greatest Proof Hoax, Not Murder You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginTIAI Update #4d: 777 + 999 = Greatest Proof Hoax, Not Murder You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Quote from: "Serenitys_Dream"Quote from: "PeaceLoveHappiness"I've never followed TS, but I find it quite interesting that suddenly after over a year and a half, this person would now claim that Michael has been murdered. If they really believe that, then why have they been leading people on all this time?TS never claimed Michael was murdered.Please read all parts of update #4, TS states his case about why it IS NOT murder.TIAI Update #4a: 777 + 999 = Greatest Proof Hoax, Not Murder You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginTIAI Update #4b: 777 + 999 = Greatest Proof Hoax, Not Murder You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginTIAI Update #4c: 777 + 999 = Greatest Proof Hoax, Not Murder You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginTIAI Update #4d: 777 + 999 = Greatest Proof Hoax, Not Murder You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginWell, and in that update did he give us SOLID evidences.............? :?
....... however I still think this was an important post which is the theme of the hoax for me :DO you Think 4 your Self. .......... we really need that anthem I've been talking about on the other thread; maybe we should write one OURSELVES!!!!!!!
BRAVO Serenitys_Dream !!!
In my opinion, TS could be stirring the pot a little, particularly in this Eliza case, however I still think this was an important post which is the theme of the hoax for me :DO you Think 4 your Self. That also implies to not allow yourself to be conditioned by TS.....to my way of thinking it has been done on purpose and just look at the results here!!. People start to doubt straight away and fall into despair again, as has been the case whenever the family won't confirm that MJ's alive. Remember, as I've said before, all of the clues and inconsistencies that point to this being a charade are STILL THERE no matter what new information comes out in the future that implies otherwise. We MUST be objective and think for ourselves rather than be conditioned by anyone or anything..... we really need that anthem I've been talking about on the other thread; maybe we should write one OURSELVES!!!!!!!
Quote from: "Puff"Quote from: "Serenitys_Dream"Quote from: "PeaceLoveHappiness"I've never followed TS, but I find it quite interesting that suddenly after over a year and a half, this person would now claim that Michael has been murdered. If they really believe that, then why have they been leading people on all this time?TS never claimed Michael was murdered.Please read all parts of update #4, TS states his case about why it IS NOT murder.TIAI Update #4a: 777 + 999 = Greatest Proof Hoax, Not Murder You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginTIAI Update #4b: 777 + 999 = Greatest Proof Hoax, Not Murder You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginTIAI Update #4c: 777 + 999 = Greatest Proof Hoax, Not Murder You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginTIAI Update #4d: 777 + 999 = Greatest Proof Hoax, Not Murder You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginWell, and in that update did he give us SOLID evidences.............? :?I would have to read them again...I haven't based my belief in Michael being Alive on what TS has said. TS isn't what brought me to the forums in the first place way back in July 2009. It was other things that just didn't seem right from the very beginning. TS has only seemed to elaborate on things we may have missed or didn't quite understand. His posts seem to validate many things that were already being independently investigated by several different people.I personally investigated that autopsy report myself and it is full of crap. I spent days, days and more days doing research on that AR. The AR just doesn't fit Michael at all, so if that has been created and doesn't reflect an actual autopsy on Michael Jackson then it is a hoax autopsy. What would be purpose of a hoax autopsy, if not for a hoax? What disqualifies my research on that? What about the paramedics describing Michael being an old bald man and that they didn't recognize him when the responded to the 911 call. What about the Ambulance photo not looking like 2009 Michael but 80's or 90's Michael and that photo not matching the paramedics description either? What about the 911 call seeming to have come from the Beverley Hills Hotel from a cell phone and not from Murray's cell, which he supposedly talking on moments before he realize Michael wasn't breathing? What about the fire alarm being pulled at UCLA Medical centre, the hospital being evacuated and there being a mass of underground tunnels there with hundreds of entrances/exits? What about Jermaine and the airport slip up and the fact that the LA airport was shut down and yet at least one flight still left? What about all the differing and inconsistent stories between people and even individuals who have been interviewed about the events of that day (and some of these interviews occurred within days of each other)?This is just a start, there is much more. Is the fact that the DNA was collected improperly in the Eliza/Vernon/Jesse/Elvis paternity case going to negate absolutely everything else, that has been uncovered by us, that supports Michael having hoaxed his death?I don't know who TS is for sure, I have had my thoughts on that but no matter what, they are not the reason I started looking into this at all nor are they the reason I have continued to research and investigate. I believe that Michael is alive. I believe this because of what we have all discovered from day one and not what a mysterious poster has presented.
I personally investigated that autopsy report myself and it is full of crap. I spent days, days and more days doing research on that AR. The AR just doesn't fit Michael at all, so if that has been created and doesn't reflect an actual autopsy on Michael Jackson then it is a hoax autopsy. What would be purpose of a hoax autopsy, if not for a hoax? What disqualifies my research on that?
But keep watching, we will yet see more developments regarding 9-9-09 and the hoax.
3-9. The Best Is Yet to Come!Well, even if you do need more evidence, keep watching for the 9-9-09 update. It will show very strong evidence of the hoax, and against the murder theory—as well as further evidence that TIAI (STUDY) has genuine hoax information (and is not a fake informer).
And then on February 7, just one day before the autopsy report was released to the public, I wrote: “... keep watching for the 9-9-09 update. It will show very strong evidence of the hoax, and against the murder theory—as well as further evidence that TIAI (STUDY) has genuine hoax information (and is not a fake informer).”When the report was released, everyone could see that the very last thing on the whole report said: “9-9-09, Date Finalized”. Was this a coincidence? There are several dates in the report: most of them in June or July, and a few in August; the latest date (other than the “Date Finalized”) is 8-19-09.It is theoretically possible that this 9-9-09 date is a coincidence, but not likely for two main reasons.