0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: "Le Papillon Bleu"The eyes could look like that because of the less eye liner....but that's not what caught my attention:it's the lipsI added some eyeliner and some white crayon :lol: it looks MJ to me
The eyes could look like that because of the less eye liner....but that's not what caught my attention:it's the lips
Quote from: "Le Papillon Bleu"Quote from: "Le Papillon Bleu"The eyes could look like that because of the less eye liner....but that's not what caught my attention:it's the lipsI added some eyeliner and some white crayon :lol: it looks MJ to meWow, he really looks much more MJ. I still have doubts, but great job!Now he doesn't look down, he looks up - so much different...Now I wonder if this is a double, then why on earth didn't someone do this photoshop job for him like you did, to look more like Michael? Maybe because it's really Michael? Hmm. Idk...Or maybe those who put this photo (which they photoshopped before) on the cover, wanted Michael to look strange (I mean not as he usually looks like), because it fitted better to their ugly text:"can Michael Jackson live down to his bizarre image?".... I'm just thinking out loud...
It's all very confusing, yes. Especially when we don't know how often wigs were used. I have to comment on that TV Guide photo...that doesn't look like him at all. Something is so strange about that picture. Maybe it's the angle. Is it just me?
which year did the tv guide come out?
The TV guide Michael looks like Michael to me. We all know that he has had work done on his face more than once. Another thing to keep in mind is that his eyebrow width and shape changed at times, plus he wore makeup and every time his weight changed, it showed in his face too. Even differences in hair length can have an effect on how much the cheek bones appear etc. I also just find it a little hard to believe that Michael would have allowed a double to be plastered onto the front of the TV guide.