0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I have thought long and hard about this post and have written it several times in the past when I have seen the children in public speaking or being photo graphed. I am the mother of 2 girls 11 and 13. We are a private family and my girls are sheltered and protected. They are a little naive and innocent because of that but we are around to protect them until we feel it's time and they are ready to be exposed to the "real" world where things aren't maybe as rosy. But we want to take our time before we gently ease them into some of the more harsher sides of life. When I see Michael's children in public situations (the funeral, the grammy awards, pictures at restaurants, and now Oprah) I think about the laws that would be in place to protect minor children. If MJ was not around, I don't believe social services or professional psychologists or his family would believe that these situations would be good for orphaned children who have been without the love and protection of their doting father for the last year. I don't care if it's Hollywood or scmollywood. Young children's emotions are not to be messed with whether the young children think they are ready for Oprah or not. Children's brains are not fully developed until they are in their early 20's and they are not capable of making sound decisions. A tramatic event like losing a cherished father at that young age is a child's nightmare and what they need is love, support, snuggling, protection and most of all shelter from prying eyes and the media. Little Blanket is 8 for goodness sake and clearly did not want to be on Oprah. Prince didn't look like he was comfortable either. While Paris looked and sounded mature, there was a nervousness to her and there have got to be laws that would protect these children from media circuses like this. I know that Michael has to be alive these children would not be seen out at all. He showed them to us in June of 09 and that must have been his turning point in allowing them out with his blessing as long as he is with them (for the hoax or it was just time) Am I making sense? Basically a long story short. If Michael is not alive there is no way Debbie Rowe or Katherine would be able to condone letting the children awkwardly answer the questions of a stranger in a media circus. There was nothing said by any of the children that was all that necessary. We all saw them at the memorial and to me that was enough. Paris's testimonial said it all and they should have left it at that unless MJ thought more needed to be said.
I have often wondered why MJ started revealing the kids faces right before he died! I believe that we agreed that it was because he may have felt the kids were getting older and it is time to show them but..........for some reason it was the timing you know? I mean almost as if MJ "knew" what was to be. :?
The kids faces were seen waaaay before 2009, I think as far back as 2007 there were pictures of the kids on the internet with or without Michael. I just think he didn't see a reason to make them keep wearing the masks anymore. I don't think it has anything to do with the hoax.
the masks issue is a sub point. Oh well. I tried to make a heartfelt post as this issue was important to me. The most important thing in this whole (hopefully hoax) thing for me has been the children. It broke my heart when I thought Michael died because I knew how much he loved and needed and cherished those kids. It made me sick to think that they were going to potentially in ways he would be dread. He was trying to raise them exactly the opposite of how he was raised. It also broke my heart that 3 little sweet children lost their beloved dad. I really wish that there were some parents like me out there who would comment. If this is not a hoax then there is a big problem with how those kids are going to be raised. One case in point is allowing them to be on that stupid Oprah show to expose and exploit them. The only way it is ok is if Michael is behind the scenes supervising. Otherwise, even if the kids wanted to do, they should have been disuaded.