0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I think this is intended to cause controversy in order to draw attention to it. It's drawing attention in the media outlets, right? How much more will radio stations play this song in order to figure out if it's Michael's voice? And think of the conversation it's drawn.It's already been mentioned elsewhere but bears repeating...Michael knows how to draw attention. Fans and non-fans alike are going to want to listen to this song to see if they believe it's Michael or not before. I think they are playing with the media. I can't wait to hear the full song - I hope it has more to do with vindication as the beginning seems to indicate.
Quote from: "voiceforthesilent"I think this is intended to cause controversy in order to draw attention to it. It's drawing attention in the media outlets, right? How much more will radio stations play this song in order to figure out if it's Michael's voice? And think of the conversation it's drawn.It's already been mentioned elsewhere but bears repeating...Michael knows how to draw attention. Fans and non-fans alike are going to want to listen to this song to see if they believe it's Michael or not before. I think they are playing with the media. I can't wait to hear the full song - I hope it has more to do with vindication as the beginning seems to indicate.You have to be right.But it does mean that Mike is working willingly with Sony again. Are we all ok with that?
Since a date we all remember, left is right and down is up and it seems nobody is getting it straight under control since the one holding the leashes is not visible anymore.And this is also exposing them ALL. Especially the business wisenheimers that like to step onto artists that were thought to be for nothing else good but for performing and attracting the masses. Play them Michael.
What on earth is the purpose? To have an army of people boycotting SONY? if they boycot SONY and if we think that SONY is involved then WHAT is the explanation of all this? They cut the branch under their own feet?
Quote from: "_Anna_"What on earth is the purpose? To have an army of people boycotting SONY? if they boycot SONY and if we think that SONY is involved then WHAT is the explanation of all this? They cut the branch under their own feet?Yes it would seem that way. But I'm operating under the assumption that this is Michael's agenda to raise controversy about the album to drive curiosity and thus sales.Because as much as it would seem like a call to boycott sony, human nature is such that the opposite will happen, and people will be drawn to learn more about it. Bad news sells, and who knows about that better then Michael.Because the fam did the same thing for TII and that sold just fine, didn't it?