0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I also agree that everything should stay anonymous, as it is on here as well. I never feel comfortable with personal info on the web, same goes for this. And some people are simply not able to donate because they don't have the financial means. But what they can do is volunteer to help charities by lending a hand or professional skills.[/color]
Quote from: "~Souza~"I also agree that everything should stay anonymous, as it is on here as well. I never feel comfortable with personal info on the web, same goes for this. And some people are simply not able to donate because they don't have the financial means. But what they can do is volunteer to help charities by lending a hand or professional skills.[/color]I know we're all anonymous here in that no one knows who's behind the user name. But when I suggested anonymous for the separate website, I meant not even user names. I'm thinking of the donations idea, mainly. I just don't think it's a good idea to have a list of names who donated - fake ones or not - out in the open. Behind the scenes, obviously. The focus is on the gift, not the giver. I'd hate to see it turn into some kind of popularity contest.
Quote from: "PJ4MJ"Quote from: "~Souza~"I also agree that everything should stay anonymous, as it is on here as well. I never feel comfortable with personal info on the web, same goes for this. And some people are simply not able to donate because they don't have the financial means. But what they can do is volunteer to help charities by lending a hand or professional skills.[/color]I know we're all anonymous here in that no one knows who's behind the user name. But when I suggested anonymous for the separate website, I meant not even user names. I'm thinking of the donations idea, mainly. I just don't think it's a good idea to have a list of names who donated - fake ones or not - out in the open. Behind the scenes, obviously. The focus is on the gift, not the giver. I'd hate to see it turn into some kind of popularity contest.That's what I meant as well.
Johnkillrory wrote: First only the people with money will have their name in the ArmyOfLove?
Very well done. Only one aspect I would like to discuss: I don't like the butterfly.It is a "watering" symbol, taking away strength from the layout. It's a symbol for a negative system in addition.I'd prefer a light of hope or a red rose instead if there should be a highlighting indicator to the menue. What's your opinion?
Quote Johnkillrory wrote: First only the people with money will have their name in the ArmyOfLove?What sites you've read it? :?:
Quote from: "paula-c"Quote Johnkillrory wrote: First only the people with money will have their name in the ArmyOfLove?What sites you've read it? :?:Well, the idea of badkolo said only people who donate are allowed in the ArmyOfLove... which I don't think is fair either, because some of us don't have the money to give. :?