0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
LadyMedic, if you call BS on others, like you are doing, I would appreciate it if you can give arguments as to why you think it's BS. Even IF it's copy and pasted from google, that doesn't necessarily mean it's BS. Don't get me wrong, but if you tell someone's wrong, then you better prove you're right. Others are putting a lot of time and effort into their investigations as well, and calling them 'experts' is not very nice or thoughtful. I can remember someone calling BS on you too, claiming you were not an expert. We here are not medical experts and can't possibly know who is right, who can assure me you are an expert? It's kinda turning to a battle of the medics. I am not saying who is right or wrong, simply because I can't, but I would like the disrespectful comments towards other members to stop.I do agree that we need to keep looking at the autopsy report, no matter how many people have went through it all.
Thank you, Ladymedia, for giving insight into something that you have training in. You can write this in your blog or just answer below but I have a few questions that I've wondered about. I'd appreciate your thoughts on these questions below...1) How many people outside of the medical staff could ride in the ambulance and how many is there room for? It appears that there was at least one or two others besides the medics in the ambulance. 2) At the hospital there was one view where it looked like someone was putting on a jacket at the back of the ambulance? Any thoughts on this? It just looked so casual and unhurried yet supposedly they were in a state of emergency (I would assume). Why would someone take the time to put on a jacket?3) The person in the ambulance was receiving compressions. I think a person giving the compressions is told not to stop that once they've started (correct?). How is it that they were able to stop once they got to the hospital? Wouldn't someone have continued with the compressions until more sophisticated equipment was hooked up? 4) Same goes for the intubation - wouldn't that be visible in the view of the patient being wheeled into the ED? I say that because someone would need to be holding it in place to make sure it doesn't shift, right?5) If the patient is intubated, wouldn't they also be monitored with pulse oximetry or other device? Does this show that he did have that attached in the ambulance or while being wheeled into the ED?6) The IV was supposedly administered in the left jugular. Do you see that IV on the person being wheeled into the hospital Room doors? If not, what happened to that? 7) The nasal cannula - If Dr Murray had this on Michael at the house it would have probably been hooked up to oxygen at some point. It doesn't appear that the person being wheeled into the ED is on oxygen - at least I can't see any oxygen tanks. Is it safe to say that if it really is a cannula that the oxygen was no longer hooked up? If not, why keep the tube there - it would only be in the way, right?Thanks again for all of your insight. Blessings.