0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
I dont believe it, that handsome gentleman in This Is It is definitely Michael all over... you can tell by the hands, posture and so on.. 8-)
Quote from: "trublu"Quote from: "Gema":lol: come on, this forum has the blogs about doubles :lol: is nothing new but the technic used was about to be discovered.I don't find this the same as a double, I had never heard of this technique before.Something was odd with some "michaels" and those we have been calling doubles.
Quote from: "Gema":lol: come on, this forum has the blogs about doubles :lol: is nothing new but the technic used was about to be discovered.I don't find this the same as a double, I had never heard of this technique before.
:lol: come on, this forum has the blogs about doubles :lol: is nothing new but the technic used was about to be discovered.
Does this remind anyone of "The green man" from the "We are the world" video? I can't really remember and I could be wrong, but wasn't it said that we could shop our image onto "the green man" and be a part of the video...Or something like that... Could this be the same technology? Could this be what Michael was trying to tell us?
Quote from: "Hollie"I dont believe it, that handsome gentleman in This Is It is definitely Michael all over... you can tell by the hands, posture and so on.. 8-)Posture? :lol: Which one? We have the big, broad shouldered MJ in The Way You Make Me Feel and a tiny small MJ in Human Nature, so which posture are you referring to?This makes a lot of sense and it would be brilliant so it's probably true. Didn't Joe say that there were mostly BODY doubles in TII? :lol: But still, I see wrong faces as well, like here:So I guess more techniques were used.OMG...these two pics side by side freak me out....everything about them is differents the hair...ears everything...are these suppose to be the same day....same outfit obviously David Copperfield: Eat your heart out! :lol:
Quote from: "Gema"Quote from: "trublu"Quote from: "Gema":lol: come on, this forum has the blogs about doubles :lol: is nothing new but the technic used was about to be discovered.I don't find this the same as a double, I had never heard of this technique before.Something was odd with some "michaels" and those we have been calling doubles.I see what you're saying, I totally agree. Something is not right.I just didn't get when you said, 'is nothing new', because this is a new theory to me. (Superimposing Michaels face onto a dancing body).Peace.