0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Could this be a double?
October 23, 2010, 02:46:44 PM
Quote from: "hachiman"
Listen, when Souza or Mo find this thread and comment about why it's not him, then you'll understand.

I know I don't post much, but they have opinions just like everybody else on this forum. I don’t know if I’m reading your posts wrong, but it seem like you coming off like Souza’s and Mo’s opinions is right on this situation. I think they’ll want you to research for yourself and come up with your own opinion, and not take theirs as the truth but just as their opinion. You showed where Souza compared a picture to another of Michael; I do see the differences in them. However, I think its Michael not saying it’s the truth this just my opinion. Can't explain the differences in the pictures, but to me it's Michael.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Could this be a double?
October 23, 2010, 08:27:09 PM
Quote from: "LAJackson"
Quote from: "hachiman"
Listen, when Souza or Mo find this thread and comment about why it's not him, then you'll understand.

I know I don't post much, but they have opinions just like everybody else on this forum. I don’t know if I’m reading your posts wrong, but it seem like you coming off like Souza’s and Mo’s opinions is right on this situation. I think they’ll want you to research for yourself and come up with your own opinion, and not take theirs as the truth but just as their opinion. You showed where Souza compared a picture to another of Michael; I do see the differences in them. However, I think its Michael not saying it’s the truth this just my opinion. Can't explain the differences in the pictures, but to me it's Michael.
And you think it's Michael in these 2 pics?



Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

~Souza~

Re: Could this be a double?
October 23, 2010, 08:34:52 PM
hachiman, can you refrain from dragging me into a discussion I'm not aware of in the future? I have given my opinion on the doubles many times, everyone knows that and I'm kinda done with the doubles. If people still don't see there were doubles, they will never see. I have not given my opinion on some of the pictures you posted though and if I will, I'd like to do that myself.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Could this be a double?
October 23, 2010, 10:34:47 PM
Those two? No, I don't think that's Michael. I'm aware he used doubles, I was talking about the first two pictures you posted. I do believe he used doubles in This Is It. I wasn't trying to come off as a douche with you, sorry if I came off that way.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Could this be a double?
October 24, 2010, 02:50:46 AM
or is truth??
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Could this be a double?
October 24, 2010, 02:58:43 AM
Quote from: "BambiMJ"
or is truth??

To me Michael looks younger and like he has a little more weight on him on the right.  I kinda feel like some parts of This is it was filmed alot earlier.  I don't think the whole movie was filmed around the same time.  That's my opinion.  I just have a feeling.  I think they was working on that project for awhile and not just for MJ's private home movie collection which they try to say is the reason they filmed the rehearsals.  Please....
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions


Re: Could this be a double?
October 24, 2010, 04:16:41 AM
Why did I even join this site? -.- I've said before that IT TAKES TIME TO GET USED TO IT AND I JOINED THIS MONTH!
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

MissG

Re: Could this be a double?
October 24, 2010, 12:18:01 PM
Quote from: "BambiMJ"
or is truth??

I think that both are MJ but one pic is shopped.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
("Minkin güerveeeee")
Michael pls come back


"Why a four-year-old child could understand this hoax. Run out and find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head nor tail out of it"

 

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal