0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I really am very surprised that NASA moved to Chile to "help", and in the case of Mexico they did not even the hint.
Yeah, and a camera and something they could watch some game on...they even had video conference calls. Sorry, but this story REALLY is a little strange when you look at all the facts. I have been sick and haven't read the forum in days, so this is the first time I read this thread, but even without this I saw that things were off. I was convinced when the first miner came up on the surface after midnight (something I predicted when they were postponing it constantly) during witching hour on the 13th, and when all off the sudden things were sped up to get them all out in less then 24 hours (so ALLrescued on the 13th). Some guy said it was magical, 33 people rescued on 13/10/10, which also makes 33. He called 33 a magical number, but it made my alarm bells go off big time. Big media hype, there must be something going on elsewhere we shouldn't pay attention to. Big chance it's Iran, but it could be something else we missed (which is their purpose of course).
I wonder what other event would be happening on a par with Chile, provided the media distract the attention of people with other news and media coverage given to the first, all international news agencies and many national were "chained" by the news of the miners.I remembered another case of a mine in Mexico, the event occurred in 2006, 63 Mexican miners were buried three years ago in a mine in Coahuila, without attempting to rescue them. 65 miners who were 150 meters compared to 700 for the Chilean mine.In February 2006 an explosion at the Pasta de Conchos mine, 65 miners buried 150 meters. Eleven of them managed to survive with some burns. The mine gas explosion shot blocked mine entrance, and the risks posed to recover the bodies, "according to the owners of the mine" and authorities are still buried 63 of the 65 dead and only two bodies were recovered .I really am very surprised that NASA moved to Chile to "help", and in the case of Mexico they did not even the hint.
Two Aussie men survived being trapped underground in the Beaconsfield mine disaster in Tasmania 2 years ago. They were underground for 2 weeks and looked a lot worse upon rescue than these healthy robust looking miners. My Intuition radar is going off. This story does not feel right.
Quote from: "RK"Two Aussie men survived being trapped underground in the Beaconsfield mine disaster in Tasmania 2 years ago. They were underground for 2 weeks and looked a lot worse upon rescue than these healthy robust looking miners. My Intuition radar is going off. This story does not feel right.I'm thinking the same thing. Go to this article and look at the first picture of the guy named Richard Villarroel. Look at his facial hair! Perfectly groomed. Were they sent soap and shaving supplies while trapped underground? Is that a normal thing to do? I wouldn't think so but how else could that be explained? Unless of course the whole thing is staged. You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginIn the article is says this: "That tiny hole became an umbilical cord used to pass hydration gels, water and food to keep them alive until a bigger space could be bored to bring them up." So I guess they could have been given shaving tools, but would that be a priority???