Jermaine's Child Support Plea -- I'm Broke, No Joke

[paula-c]

I think that Jaafar is still a child to understand these things ..... Illuminati :geek:

[tekamjforever]

I think that Jaafar is still a child to understand these things ..... Illuminati :geek:

 :shock:

[Ijustcantstoplovingu]

I think that Jaafar is still a child to understand these things ..... Illuminati :geek:

I think th Jaafar twitter account is a fake, its not verified. Just someone posing. MJO  

I came across the video last year July or August along with the Forerunner videos similar theme.

Peace

[~Souza~]

I think that Jaafar is still a child to understand these things ..... Illuminati :geek:

I think th Jaafar twitter account is a fake, its not verified. Just someone posing. MJO  

I came across the video last year July or August along with the Forerunner videos similar theme.

Peace

He's followed by other Jacksons, so I am not so sure it is fake.

[paula-c]

When I said that Jaafar is still a child to understand these things, I said it thinking that probably an adult of the family uses this account of twitter to publish this video.

[whatyourheartsays]

That would mean i earn more money than Jermaine Jackson ??  :lol:

Anyway, it's an info from TMZ, a gossip-tabloid-trash stuff (please don't forget it)
We don't know what Jermaine said exactly, about how broke he is...
Showing on tv etc etc etc doesn't mean "money" in the end, and we don't really know how much he can be showing off to pretend he is wealthy, so that he gets business contact, pretending he's not running after money.

And don't forget that most of ex-husband claim they cannot pay for child support...It depends on where the money goes : if it goes to the children, he will pay only for them until they are old, but if it's money for his ex-wife, he could be paying for the rest of his life, which would be a good reason to show he's broke...Legal/money issue about divorce and child support are ALWAYS about "who will be more broke than the other, to avoid paying for the rest of his life"
This includnig Jackson family members...as any other people.

[Grace]

And then we have last but not least the "family ethics" theme again.
Child support was already discussed with Doc Murray - it's about care for our children who are our future. Yet we deny to see the big picture unfolded and run for the detail - we don't see the forest but are running for one tree only.

We see at minimum 4 main and repeated themes in the MJ case:
1) "family ethics" - (child support, violence in family, stun gun etc.) -  care for the living close to you
2) "medical / professional ethics" - (doctor stories) - do only what is right and don't betray
3) "religious dedication" - care for your spiritual health and balance
4) "corruption / state services / leadership ethics" - don't rely on others to solve your issues

and of course cleaning Michael's name.

Btw, why would we judge Doc Murray differently than Jermaine, why would we dare judging at all based on gossip publications?
This stating "Jermaine" is artificial drama added for several reasons.
It acquires more attention if a celeb name is involved.
It stirs up public emotions more if a celeb name is involved.
It takes public attention away from the actual real problems of the world.
It takes public attention away from personal issues one has - and distances from even thinking about alternatives and solutions.
It is a perfect means to SET PUBLIC TO SLEEP.
Stories like Jermaine's Plea are public's PROP-OF-FOOL.

How do you silence your child the most effective way?
By putting it in front of TV.
Is this drugging?
Up to you to decide what you give your kid to eat - not only for physical saturation but also for emotional and spiritual saturation.
If you care for your child, you are there for your child and do not absent yourself.
This is only one of the messages getting to my ears with articles like this.

I posted this earlier:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Re: Michael Jackson's Dad -- 'He Was Not Gay'
Mon May 03, 2010 7:41 pm
This is one more piece of the "professional ethics standard" thingie.
It perfectly fits into the moral clover leaf.

I can't withdraw from the impression that the hoax is a public education / edutainment project and one of the goals is teaching the gone lost again how to tell "right" from "wrong".
Like illuminating a path into the right direction.
In short: "learn and have fun". Some master teaching.

Thank you, Michael, for your endless efforts in teaching.

[curls]

Grace - very, very, very well said above! I agree with you totally.