An Insider Reveals the Truth About "This Is It

[Mj5StarChick]

Yep interesting...interesting...i just wanna see what the truth is and soon LOL

[scorpionchik]

Karen is not celebrity, she is a make up artist for celebrities. I think of Liz Taylor......MJ would trust her only or Janet? Not necessarily blond hair, it can be wig.

[MJJ Forever]

Here is the link to YT You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

[jacilovesmichael]

If it turns out to be Karen, I'm going to have a hard time listening to it. She has rubbed me the wrong way ever since June of '09.

[RK]

If it turns out to be Karen, I'm going to have a hard time listening to it. She has rubbed me the wrong way ever since June of '09.

Was just thinking the same.

[LuvmyMikey]

Here is the link to YT You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Thank you!

[CC]

watching... :roll:

[tekamjforever]

:roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:

[farhatmjj]

MJhoaxevidence is one of my favorite youtube hoax channels. They make good videos. I don't think they would fake it but they too can be fooled. I'd not get my hopes up but will watch. Looked rather like Paris Hilton to me, lol!

[lovemj]

hope its not fake and somthing is revealed i feel like im playing a game of snakes and ladders one minute i,m up the next i,m down  

[all4loveandbelieve]

I resaw the video, this person, looks very familiar, I cannot pin point who she is. not (Paris Hilton) It is frustrating. I tried to enlarge the photo but it's unclear.  She may not be blond, she may have worn a wig. What I don't understand if they have the interview already, why didn't they make us see it now, instead of waiting for it. This is another thing that does not make sense. They showed us this blond lady talking, so why  not post it with this youtube. Just my opinion. I just hope it is not another led down. Love.

[beLIEve4MJ]

I don't think that the person was indicating that the blurred image is of the celeb...it said "For dramatic purposes only."

[PeaceLoveHappiness]

I don't think that the person was indicating that the blurred image is of the celeb...it said "For dramatic purposes only."

I agree.  I don't think the blurred blonde person is the celeb in question.  I think showing a blurred person talking just added to the claim that a celeb has come forward; mush like starting the video with the clips from the Al Pacino/Russell Crowe movie.  I think all of this was done just to enhance the video.  My take is that the "for dramatic purposes only" indicates that the blurred blonde person is not the real celeb who has come forward.  Hopefully we will know soon, once this person uploads their next video.

[whatyourheartsays]

Told you Michael woudl be back for my birthday  :lol:

Isn't it weird that on september 23 we have this video + austin Brown twitting about big news to happen on monday 27 at 11am EST.

[robd]

Question is - what female celebrity was in 'This is it'? Orianthi?