0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: "MJJ1982"Just like I've said on the old forum, I think it's Michael all the time Yep ALL Michael always 110%. Why think otherwise?
Just like I've said on the old forum, I think it's Michael all the time
Quote from: "reading_on"The first two pictures should not be compared to look for doubles. As someone posted,one is in makeup. Makeup can change the depth and shape of your eyes, that is why they give you the little guides on the backs of shadows packs. One way will make your eyes bigger, one will make your eyes smaller, younger, older, brighter, duller etc. Base for the face even changes the appearance of the shape of the face. If it didn't, us older ladies wouldn't bother with the BOTAFIRM or Revitalift.I think, without a doubt, Michael used doubles for things (there was a media special about it and not one of those bad media specials either), but these photos should never be compared for that. Makeup and lighting make a 100% difference.I would post my pictures makeup and none.. then you could really see two different people but I don't want to scare anybody today.. :lol:Correct, that's very logical. We've been saying that for years now, but noone seem to understand... I wonder why, it's not that difficult.AGree!!It is just different make-up!Anyways, you're funny!
The first two pictures should not be compared to look for doubles. As someone posted,one is in makeup. Makeup can change the depth and shape of your eyes, that is why they give you the little guides on the backs of shadows packs. One way will make your eyes bigger, one will make your eyes smaller, younger, older, brighter, duller etc. Base for the face even changes the appearance of the shape of the face. If it didn't, us older ladies wouldn't bother with the BOTAFIRM or Revitalift.I think, without a doubt, Michael used doubles for things (there was a media special about it and not one of those bad media specials either), but these photos should never be compared for that. Makeup and lighting make a 100% difference.I would post my pictures makeup and none.. then you could really see two different people but I don't want to scare anybody today.. :lol:
Quote from: "MJmakesmespeechless"Quote from: "MJJ1982"Just like I've said on the old forum, I think it's Michael all the time Yep ALL Michael always 110%. Why think otherwise?Why think otherwise? Well, the only reason not to think otherwise is if you ignore all of the evidence. Yes, it could turn out to be Michael all the time, but there is evidence that says otherwise. That is why we are investigating because there are things that just don't add up. If I was Michael Jackson, I would probably want to use a double from time to time, to escape the crazy things that follow him around. And if I looked like Michael Jackson, there's a good chance I could be talked into doing "ANYTHING FOR MONEY". Open your minds. With love.
I think all of these photos contain the real MJ. Any differences are due to lighting, make up to varying degrees and even the color of clothing can change someone's look. Just see "Color Me Beautiful" books for evidence of this point, how tired/refreshed one is, how hydrated/dehydrated the skin is, the food diet at the time, non surgical facial creams/procedures, stress, environmental/air conditioning/humidity and probably other factors. Anyway the voice and eyes are MJ's in all of those videos. When on tv, the police/authorities don't want to identify an individual they used to put a Black strip on the image of the person over their eyes. This is because the eyes hold the key to someone's identity. Cover the eyes and one is unidentifiable (when on a photo).
I will not apologize, either ONE Michael Jackson hadabout 39 surgeries, or two or three Michael Jackson'shad a COMBINATION of 39 different surgeries. :lol: .
Started by supermj4eva Hoax Videos
Started by thenutcrackersuite Other Odd Things
Started by *Mo* Hoax Videos
Started by the arabian nights The Funeral, The Body & Forest Lawn
Started by Steph16 Other Odd Things