0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: to do with Lady Gaga
August 27, 2010, 03:25:20 PM
Quote from: "Loveneverfeltsogood"
Just to make it clear, i was not trying to compare Mj to Lady Gaga, i've used MJ's pictures only as an example, i could use other singer's pictures but i decided to use his pictures because i'm sure we are all more familiar to them. I don't think MJ is pornographic either Lady Gaga, both are just artist and they perform for adults, her songs are for adults and i'm almost sure that there is a "parental advisory" on the cover of her CDs ( i'm not sure because i have none ).
I'm NOT attacking Michael. Remember what happened with Michael's "BOW" video, do you think it was fair?, Lady Gaga is not " he little mermaid" she doesn't perform for children.

I understand your point, but I also know that my 9 year old cousin's favorite singer is Lady Gaga, along with all her 2nd grade friends. They dress up like her and imitate her. I find that disturbing. Indeed that is where the parents should come in, but unfortunately parents can only control what children are exposed to while they are in their care... and Gaga is EVERYWHERE.

Like I said before, I'm sure she has fans of all ages. But a big portion of her fanbase consists of young girls that are far from being adults. But I do understand your point and perhaps she cannot choose who her fans are.

But (and I don't really have any tangible proof here) I do feel she is marketed towards young girls. She may not have control over that, just like she may not have full control over her image and creativity and she may not be fully aware of it... This is where the Illuminati come in.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
What you have just witnessed could be the end of a particularly terrifying nightmare. It isn’t. It’s the beginning.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Re: to do with Lady Gaga
August 29, 2010, 06:42:06 PM
Quote from: "AnaMarcia"
Quote from: "Loveneverfeltsogood"
In my opinion this article is retrograde, sexist and extremely conservative, I wonder what right-wing religious group is part of the person who wrote it.

Can anybody explain me why this picture is pornographic?
 

What about this one?

 

What is the big difference?
Let’s compare a few more pictures.
 
She is pointing to her…omg she is a b*tch!!  :o


And

 
He is a slave of the rhythm, a genius!!   :)

Another one:
 
She is half naked…what a shame!!  :shock:

And…

He is so cute and sexy!!!  ;)

This one

 
What is she doing? I hope my daughter never will be like this!  :evil:

And…

 
I hope my son some day will be like Beckham!!!  :D

My point with this post is that the article is obviously sexist, the problem is that if a woman is sexually liberated ( or aggressive ) is a pervert filthy and is the end of the world!!! But if a man does the same is just provocative and... omg he is so sexy!!!

Another thing that I would like to point out from this article is about this sentence:
“Boys expect certain sexual ‘services’ from their girlfriends that were once the province of prostitutes.”, Can anybody tell me what kind of services are province of prostitutes?  :roll:  Does it means that a woman/girl can’t do whatever she wants with her boyfriend or husband because she would become a prostitute?
I can understand that parents wants to protect their children, but I think is so unfair to blame Lady Gaga, Madonna or another singer, their videos are for ADULTS. If parents goes to a Pussycat dolls concert with their kids, whose fault is it?
Anyway I can see the link between the general idea of the article and Illuminati-NWO.

Sorry,
But I just think we're fans of Michael mainly because of his talent and his sensitivity to compose music with intelligent lyrics with meaning or romantic or humanitarian message of faith and hope!
Of course he also sometimes used of sensuality in their clips and shows, I give the example of the song "Give in to me" is one of my favorite and he uses a lot of sensuality in the lyric, it also has the sexual appeal, but it is mild, it is sexual and romantic at the same time ... he knows the voice balance between an aggressive tone and sentimental. The same happens in "In the closet."
Michael dancing with his hand on p. .. OK, but we never saw him in explicit sex scene, he never trivialized sex.
He was almost naked in the clip with Lisa, but for me that scene is much more romantic than sexual.
The problem with these artists that Mo told is that it is present in all the clips and lyrics .... no content, it is sometimes embarrassing to watch.
I  do not think a kiss between two women in public can be compared to normal between a man and woman
And if you pay close attention not only banal they encourage sex, it's much worse!
I couldn't agree more! :)
I applaud Michael for being able to achieve such sex appeal while remaining tasteful and able to appeal to all ages without being too inappropriate or over-board. Not many (in fact hardly any) celebrities can accomplish that. Lady Gaga is not an artist for children. I just love how Michael is able to do his thing, be sensual and romantic and all that jazz while still being perfectly marketable to children 5 years old!!! And its not just because he is male and Gaga is female. a husband and wife kissing on stage is much different then two females  doing it for shock-value :P haha.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

In My Heart; I Feel You Are All My Brothers...[/b]


*

PJ4MJ

Re: to do with Lady Gaga
August 29, 2010, 08:01:16 PM
One of the obvious differences I see between Michael and all of these other performers is that while Michael may have moves that are sexy/sexual, the focus is always on the dance.  The sexuality that comes out of his performances is a natural expression that comes from feeling the music with his soul.  On the contrary, so many of today's performers are working the sex angle because they don't have much of anything else.  Can't dance?  Don't worry...just throw on some fishnet, a couple strips of clothing just so we can get past the censors, and writhe around on the stage a lot.

We all know truly great, God-given talent when we see it.  Someone so blessed doesn't need to resort to cheap sexuality, shocking images of violence and other gimmicks to win mass appeal - or maintain the kind of well-deserved success Michael Jackson has for nearly 50 years.

I think Gaga is just a flash in the pan.  Her debut album came out two years ago and already she's known more for her outfits and the shock value of her videos than anything else.  But it seems that is what the game is these days.  I don't think it's by accident.  If you don't buy into the Illuminati, then you probably don't believe there's some force at work to dummy down or degrade society's moral fiber.  I, for one, think that is exactly what is going on, and the music industry is a huge part of that agenda...and these people also know very well that, regardless of who the "target market" is, there are plenty of impressionable, young minds soaking all of it up like sponges.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

paula-c

Re: to do with Lady Gaga
August 31, 2010, 01:36:02 PM
Unfortunately there is much ignorance from music consumers who accept everything radio or television presents them as new musical trends. Fans or followers of many products of the recording industry did not even know or perceive as they are being manipulated vilely and their brains flushed. An example: Gaga Lady. Symbolism around Lady Gaga is so obvious that one might ask whether everything is a bad joke gusto.El symbolism Illuminati has become so clear that the analysis as it becomes a simple exercise to point out the obvious. One person (either an action or not) is a tribute to mind control, where be empty content, incoherent and distracted becomes a thing "fashion."

Its name Gaga is a term which immediately refers to the lack of awareness. Here some synonyms derived from the thesaurus dictionary:
•Dado to joyful stupidity: hollow head, head of Plover, capricious, frivolous, frothy, atolondrados, cheerful, disorientated, silly. Head of bird, stupid.

•Afectado or exhibit irrationality and unhealthy mental: sick brain, crazy, delayed, insane, with mental disorder, distraught, chocho, crazy, orderliness, sick mentale, lunatica, played, unbalanced, disposed, evil.
"Gaga" is probably the Word easier to say in language English, as it is often the case with the first sound emitted by infants trying to imitate speech.

In fact one song "Just Dance" is about to be completely idiotic. While young people masses mimics Gaga gestures and "style", his performance is part of a superior system that incorporates many other "stars of the music" with the same symbolism. She is creative. But at the end of the day "Lady Gaga" she's doing everything necessary to become an international star, even incorporating performances symbolism of the elite, making it one of the puppets of the Illuminati.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Re: to do with Lady Gaga
August 31, 2010, 03:05:32 PM
To the OP, how do you know for certain that Lady Gaga is not a satanist? None of us know anything completely factual about celebrities, because we don't personally know them. However, it is true that she portrays satanic images in her videos, and people have to understand that observations and assumptions will most certainly be made; it comes with the territory.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal