0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Yes what did America did to you!.. I read that MJ when he left from Neverland he wanted to move in Montreal, He said we were the only ones who did not judge him, and purchased his cd's without any questions. The only thing refrained him was the weather, we have winter, very cold, long winter. He wouldn't be able to live here if he is used to L>A> warm weather. I also read that MJ was anti drugs. He spread it to everyone that drugs are not the answer. So how can he preach something but he does not follow it. We will never find the answer, until he comes out and say it, yes I was addicted to pain killers. Remember what ever we read it is not necessarily the truth, they embellish it so us readers will read and buy into it, and who gets rich the media. it could be that than yes he may have been taking pain killers because what he endured with the molestation courts and his life was in a shamble. Now I am positive he did not die with overdose of propofol, nor pain killers, nor sleeping pills this was a diversion so we think he is really dead. We all know he is not dead. I am saying this story sounds true but also a fabricated story. This is my opinion, I may be wrong, as I may be right. I just wish MJ is fine and well where ever he is, he is very much missed. Love you MJ. Love and blessings to everyone.
Quote from: "Alem (Thetruth)"He admitted to have problems with prescription drugs back then so it might as well be true but Idkso why would he be in denial when it happened later?
He admitted to have problems with prescription drugs back then so it might as well be true but Idk
Even anti-drugs people can become addicted. Just because you refuse to do or even try heroin or smoke pot does not mean you'll resist painkillers if you're in a lot of physical pain. Anti-this or anti-that alone does not protect you. You might not realize you're walking into a trap, most likely you'll realize you're in trouble once you're already IN the trap, if you get what I'm saying.
Quote from: "suspicious mind"Quote from: "Alem (Thetruth)"He admitted to have problems with prescription drugs back then so it might as well be true but Idkso why would he be in denial when it happened later?Please eloborate. What do you mean when it happened later ? And how was he in denial ?
I think the intervention story some family members have been feeding the media is BS. I do not believe it. And I think the Oprah interview was held in 1992 and his drug dependecy issues started in 1993
Quote from: "Alem (Thetruth)"I think the intervention story some family members have been feeding the media is BS. I do not believe it. And I think the Oprah interview was held in 1992 and his drug dependecy issues started in 1993feb. 10th 1993 i just went and checked.. as for the intervention stories think maybe they could have been about then and they are allowing people to presume that they are about now. or he may have had some other problem that they are illuding to.or they want to give the media enough rope to hang themselves.hehe for all anyone knows they may have just all felt that he was being overwhelmed with being a single parent.it is interesting that someone brought up the possiblity that because the drugs were not of the illegal kind that michael might have considered them not to be a problem. this is from what i understand the same thing that was suggested about elvis.
Quote from: "suspicious mind"Quote from: "Alem (Thetruth)"I think the intervention story some family members have been feeding the media is BS. I do not believe it. And I think the Oprah interview was held in 1992 and his drug dependecy issues started in 1993feb. 10th 1993 i just went and checked.. as for the intervention stories think maybe they could have been about then and they are allowing people to presume that they are about now. or he may have had some other problem that they are illuding to.or they want to give the media enough rope to hang themselves.hehe for all anyone knows they may have just all felt that he was being overwhelmed with being a single parent.it is interesting that someone brought up the possiblity that because the drugs were not of the illegal kind that michael might have considered them not to be a problem. this is from what i understand the same thing that was suggested about elvis.In the first segment yes u might be right. But Michael thinking Propofol being an legal drug which somehow took away it's danger is not something I believe in either. I think he very well was aware of the effect and downside. Remember that unlike Demerol, Propofol is not a controlled substance which makes it easier to conduct a hoax.
i think in order for him not to die at some point from doing this he would have to be intubated. if he was intubated often i think there would most likely be vocal chord damage. jmo