I Found THE best Double!!

[Puff]

It's the same person. Diffrent lighting, creating or taking away shadow.

No way... The ears are totally different....

[Datroot]

Its quite scary actually - if you don't look at the ears, you see exactly the same person.

[*Mo*]

It's the same person. Diffrent lighting, creating or taking away shadow.

Since when can lighting and shadow create a little "thingy" like this..?

[foreye]

OK. Sorry. It will not happen again.

What the O2 speech concerns.
Wouldn't it be a big risc, that the fans which are standing right in front of their star, would expose him as a double?

He has been using doubles for years and his fans never noticed it, so why all of a sudden would they notice it now?

Here's a nice comparison pic for you, pics were taken in 1989 and 1990...

ok, that's really creepy :roll:

[foreye]

OK. Sorry. It will not happen again.

What the O2 speech concerns.
Wouldn't it be a big risc, that the fans which are standing right in front of their star, would expose him as a double?

He has been using doubles for years and his fans never noticed it, so why all of a sudden would they notice it now?

Here's a nice comparison pic for you, pics were taken in 1989 and 1990...

OMG... they are soooo different !!!  but witch one is real MJ now??  :roll:  :cry:

the one right! :mrgreen:

[Alem (Thetruth)]

I disagree! I found a pitcure of Michael from the same day and there is clearly diffrent angels and lighting which makes you think it's diffrent ears. But it's the same and it is Michael all the way! Will provide you with a pic which demonstrates my opinion.
Darn! I can't get the image to show.  :lol:

here is a link
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

[Puff]

I disagree! I found a pitcure of Michael from the same day and there is clearly diffrent angels and lighting which makes you think it's diffrent ears. But it's the same and it is Michael all the way! Will provide you with a pic which demonstrates my opinion.
Darn! I can't get the image to show.  :lol:

here is a link
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

it's not the same day.. The jacket is different and also the make-up...

[Serenitys_Dream]

Here's a nice comparison pic for you, pics were taken in 1989 and 1990...




[/b]

There are several things wrong with comparing these two photographs.

1. The two pictures are taken from completely different angles. So the ears can not be compared exactly. This difference in angle can make it appear that there are differences in shape etc when there may not be.

2. Michael's head is tilted differently in the two photographs, this again creates angle differences.

3. Lighting and shadow must be considered as the conditions under which each photograph was taken are also different. Due to angles already mentioned in points 1 & 2 this can lead to what may at first appear to be differences when there may not be any.

4. The pictures are different sizes. This makes the ears and anything that may distinguish them unable to be compared adequately.

To sum it up, you can not compare any photograph unless they are taken from exactly the same position, the head must also be in the same position, the lighting conditions must be the same and the size of the pictures also has to be the same. Distortions can be caused by any of these and there are probably other things to consider as well.

Even the following comparison is not accurate due to the above mentioned flaws.

[foreye]

i don't care what anybody says, Michael used doubles throughout his whole career. I've never seen a celebrity with different shape ears ever time he or she is in public except Michael. Please tell me why his ears always look different and don't tell me because of the angel that's straight bullshit. You can post will smith ears in every angel and i bet you his ears would looked exactly the same :roll:

[Alem (Thetruth)]

i don't care what anybody says, Michael used doubles throughout his whole career. I've never seen a celebrity with different shape ears ever time he or she is in public except Michael. Please tell me why his ears always look different and don't tell me because of the angel that's straight bullshit. You can post will smith ears in every angel and i bet you his ears would looked exactly the same :roll:

Why are you being hostile? yeez

[Alem (Thetruth)]

I disagree! I found a pitcure of Michael from the same day and there is clearly diffrent angels and lighting which makes you think it's diffrent ears. But it's the same and it is Michael all the way! Will provide you with a pic which demonstrates my opinion.
Darn! I can't get the image to show.  :lol:

here is a link
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

it's not the same day.. The jacket is different and also the make-up...

You missunderstood. The first and last pitchure is from the same day.

[foreye]

:roll: I am sick of yall saying the angel crap bullshit

SAME DAMN ANGEL. WHY IS HALF OF HIS EAR IS MISSING[attachment=0:3nb181mv]MJEARS.jpg[/attachment:3nb181mv]

[foreye]

it sure does because that guy is  not MICHAEL


[attachment=0:3l6zxv7g]mjers2.jpg[/attachment:3l6zxv7g]

[Sandy]

This guy IS Michael. When will this perpetual comparing finally stop?  :roll:
Just because the ear looks different, it doesn't mean that this man isn't Michael.
The compare of the ears is ridiculous. It will have reasons why they look like as they look.

[nefari]

Michael Joe and Michael Joseph