Jermaine Jackson: Dr. Murray Should Drop Dead

[superflysister81]

7/18/2010 7:18 AM PDT by TMZ Staff

Jermaine Jackson showed no mercy in Malibu yesterday on the fate he thinks should befall Dr. Conrad Murray and others he believes killed Michael Jackson.

here's the video :

http://www.tmz.com/videos?autoplay=true ... aadab954f2

[MissG]

They all whould drop dead
Who are all?

[*Mo*]

They all whould drop dead
Who are all?

Jermaine says "They all SHOULD drop dead", not would...

[MissG]

Ooopps, long nails, sorry...

Who are they?

[*Mo*]

Ooopps, long nails, sorry...

Who are they?

That's okay, I'm familiar with that problem  :lol:

There's only one way to find out who Jermaine means by "they", and that is to ask him.  I've sent him a tweet about it.

[MissG]

I asked Randy and he ignored me big time, let´s hope Jermaine brings some answers...we all know how his bass will look like...but nothing about the case.

[Jude]

Ooopps, long nails, sorry...

Who are they?

That's okay, I'm familiar with that problem  :lol:

There's only one way to find out who Jermaine means by "they", and that is to ask him.  I've sent him a tweet about it.

I'm guessing" they " as in The Jackson family believing that there are more the Murry involved.

[*Mo*]

Ooopps, long nails, sorry...

Who are they?

That's okay, I'm familiar with that problem  :lol:

There's only one way to find out who Jermaine means by "they", and that is to ask him.  I've sent him a tweet about it.

I'm guessing" they " as in The Jackson family believing that there are more the Murry involved.

Yes, that is what I think as well, but it would be nice if Jermaine had been a bit more specific...  ;)

[PJ4MJ]

I kinda see this whole vid a bit differently.  I see a lot not only in what Jermaine says, but how he says it.

He's asked if he agrees with Joe's lawsuit against Conrad Murray.  Jermaine answers, "Yeah...for the right reasons...yeah."

Jermaine doesn't answer with any  conviction, and then basically says it depends.  On what?  What are the right reasons?  It's an wrongful death lawsuit.  Pretty self-explanatory, I should think.

Then he's asked what should happen to Murray and his FIRST answer is, "God knows."  Only when TMZ starts going off on other tangents does Jermaine say, "They all should drop dead."  He almost threw that in as an afterthought, and I don't think he was pointing the comment directly at Murray anymore.  Who are they?  Only Jermaine can say.  The whole family likes to keep us guessing on that one.

[Jude]

I kinda see this whole vid a bit differently.  I see a lot not only in what Jermaine says, but how he says it.

He's asked if he agrees with Joe's lawsuit against Conrad Murray.  Jermaine answers, "Yeah...for the right reasons...yeah."

Jermaine doesn't answer with any  conviction, and then basically says it depends.  On what?  What are the right reasons?  It's an wrongful death lawsuit.  Pretty self-explanatory, I should think.

Then he's asked what should happen to Murray and his FIRST answer is, "God knows."  Only when TMZ starts going off on other tangents does Jermaine say, "They all should drop dead."  He almost threw that in as an afterthought, and I don't think he was pointing the comment directly at Murray anymore.  Who are they?  Only Jermaine can say.  The whole family likes to keep us guessing on that one.

I'll guess again, that Joe is not just doing it for Money

[paula-c]

A riddle?  :?:
Looks like a soap opera by chapters ,..... ! do not miss the next chapter! :mrgreen:

[Serenitys_Dream]

Jermaine Jackson: Dr. Murray Should Drop Dead
7/18/2010 7:18 AM PDT by TMZ Staff

Jermaine Jackson showed no mercy in Malibu yesterday on the fate he thinks should befall Dr. Conrad
Murray and others he believes killed Michael Jackson.

Article Publish date/time:
7/18/2010 7:18 AM
2, 77, 88, 111
7 + 1 + 8 + 2 + 1 + 7 + 1 + 8 = 35 - it is "the cosmic organization, 30, allowing the alive creature, 5, the karmic liberation; as septenary quintuple (35 = 5 x 7) it is the evolution in the life and by the life".

3 + 5 = 8 - Symbol of the Cosmic Christ. Number of the perfection, the infinity. In mathematics the symbol of the infinity is represented by a 8 laid down. Number of the balance and of the cosmic order, according to the Egyptians. It is the symbol of the new Life, the final Resurrection and the anticipated Resurrection that is the baptism.According to Clement of Alexandria, the Christ places under the sign of 8 the one he made to be born again. Represent the totality and the coherence of the creation in evolution.
http://www.ridingthebeast.com/numbers/nu8.php

The DOTS (Acronyms) in this article are about Diabetes, possible causes and alternative treatments.

JJDMSDD

JJ - Jejunjejunostomy
Jejunjejunostomy - an anastomosis between two portions of the jejunum.
http://www.medilexicon.com/medicaldictionary.php?t=46238

Jejunum - the part of the small intestine between the duodenum and the ileum
http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=jejunum

Anastomosis - a natural or surgical joining of parts or branches of tubular structures so as to make or become continuous
http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=anastomosis

Diabetes May Be Disorder Of Upper Intestine: Surgery May Correct It
ScienceDaily (Mar. 6, 2008) — Growing evidence shows that surgery may effectively cure Type 2 diabetes — an approach that not only may change the way the disease is treated, but that introduces a new way of thinking about diabetes.

A new article — published in a special supplement to the February issue of Diabetes Care by a leading expert in the emerging field of diabetes surgery — points to the small bowel as the possible site of critical mechanisms for the development of diabetes.

The study's author, Dr. Francesco Rubino of NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, presents scientific evidence on the mechanisms of diabetes control after surgery. Clinical studies have shown that procedures that simply restrict the stomach's size (i.e., gastric banding) improve diabetes only by inducing massive weight loss. By studying diabetes in animals, Dr. Rubino was the first to provide scientific evidence that gastrointestinal bypass operations involving rerouting the gastrointestinal tract (i.e., gastric bypass) can cause diabetes remission independently of any weight loss, and even in subjects that are not obese.

"By answering the question of how diabetes surgery works, we may be answering the question of how diabetes itself works," says Dr. Rubino, who is a professor in the Department of Surgery at Weill Cornell Medical College and chief of gastrointestinal metabolic surgery at NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell.

Dr. Rubino's prior research has shown that the primary mechanisms by which gastrointestinal bypass procedures control diabetes specifically rely on the bypass of the upper small intestine — the duodenum and jejunum. This is a key finding that may point to the origins of diabetes.

"When we bypass the duodenum and jejunum, we are bypassing what may be the source of the problem," says Dr. Rubino, who is heading up NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell's Diabetes Surgery Center.

In fact, it has become increasingly evident that the gastrointestinal tract plays an important role in energy regulation, and that many gut hormones are involved in the regulation of sugar metabolism. "It should not surprise anyone that surgically altering the bowel's anatomy affects the mechanisms that regulate blood sugar levels, eventually influencing diabetes," Dr. Rubino says.

While other gastrointestinal operations may cure diabetes as an effect of changes that improve blood sugar levels, Dr. Rubino's research findings in animals show that procedures based on a bypass of the upper intestine may work instead by reversing abnormalities of blood glucose regulation.

In fact, bypass of the upper small intestine does not improve the ability of the body to regulate blood sugar levels. "When performed in subjects who are not diabetic, the bypass of the upper intestine may even impair the mechanisms that regulate blood levels of glucose," says Dr. Rubino. In striking contrast, when nutrients' passage is diverted from the upper intestine of diabetic patients, diabetes resolves.

This, he explains, implies that the upper intestine of diabetic patients may be the site where an abnormal signal is produced, causing, or at least favoring, the development of the disease.

How exactly the upper intestine is dysfunctional remains to be seen. Dr. Rubino proposes an original explanation known in the scientific community as the "anti-incretin theory."

Incretins are gastrointestinal hormones, produced in response to the transit of nutrients, that boost insulin production. Because an excess of insulin can determine hypoglycemia (extremely low levels of blood sugar) — a life-threatening condition — Dr. Rubino speculates that the body has a counter-regulatory mechanism (or "anti-incretin" mechanism), activated by the same passage of nutrients through the upper intestine. The latter mechanism would act to decrease both the secretion and the action of insulin.

"In healthy patients, a correct balance between incretin and anti-incretin factors maintains normal excursions of sugar levels in the bloodstream," he explains. "In some individuals, the duodenum and jejunum may be producing too much of this anti-incretin, thereby reducing insulin secretion and blocking the action of insulin, ultimately resulting in Type 2 diabetes."

Indeed, in Type 2 diabetes, cells are resistant to the action of insulin ("insulin resistance"), while the pancreas is unable to produce enough insulin to overcome the resistance.

After gastrointestinal bypass procedures, the exclusion of the upper small intestine from the transit of nutrients may offset the abnormal production of anti-incretin, thereby resulting in remission of diabetes.

In order to better understand these mechanisms, and help make the potential benefits of diabetes surgery more widely available, Dr. Rubino calls for prioritizing research in diabetes surgery. "Further research on the exact molecular mechanisms of diabetes, surgical control of diabetes and the role played by the bowel in the disease may bring us closer to the cause of diabetes."

Today, most patients with diabetes are not offered a surgical option, and bariatric surgery is recommended only for those with severe obesity (a body mass index, or BMI, of greater than 35kg).

"It has become clear, however, that BMI cut-offs can no longer be used to determine who is an ideal candidate for surgical treatment of diabetes," says Dr. Rubino.

"There is, in fact, growing evidence that diabetes surgery can be effective even for patients who are only slightly obese or just overweight. Clinical trials in this field are therefore a priority as they allow us to compare diabetes surgery to other treatment options in the attempt to understand when the benefits of surgery outweigh its risks. Clinical guidelines for diabetes surgery will certainly be different from those for bariatric surgery, and should not be based only on BMI levels," he notes.

"The lesson we have learned with diabetes surgery is that diabetes is not always a chronic and relentless disease, where the only possible treatment goal is just the control of hyperglycemia and minimization of the risk of complications. Gastrointestinal surgery offers the possibility of complete disease remission. This is a major shift in the way we consider treatment goals for diabetes. It is unprecedented in the history of the disease," adds Dr. Rubino.

Type 2 diabetes, which accounts for 90 to 95 percent of all cases of diabetes, is a growing epidemic that afflicts more than 200 million people worldwide.

At a time when diabetes is growing epidemically worldwide, Dr. Rubino says that finding new treatment strategies is a race against time. "At this point, missing the opportunity that surgery offers is not an option."

In addition to having performed landmark studies in the field of diabetes surgery, Dr. Rubino was the principal organizer of an influential Diabetes Surgery Summit, held in Rome in March 2007. This international consensus conference helped establish the field, making international recommendations for the use of surgery and creating an International Diabetes Surgery Task Force. Dr. Rubino serves as a founding member
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/03/080305113659.htm

DM - Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes mellitus, often simply referred to as diabetes—is a condition in which a person has high blood sugar, either because the body does not produce enough insulin, or because cells do not respond to the insulin that is produced. This high blood sugar produces the classical symptoms of polyuria  (frequent urination), polydipsia (increased thirst) and polyphagia  (increased hunger).

* Type 1 diabetes: results from the body's failure to produce insulin, and presently requires the person to inject insulin.
* Type 2 diabetes: results from insulin resistance, a condition in which cells fail to use insulin properly, sometimes combined with an absolute insulin deficiency.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diabetes_mellitus

SDD - Subantimicrobial-Dose Doxycycline
Periodontal Disease and Control of Diabetes Mellitus
Marvin E. Herring, MD; Shiwan K. Shah, DO
From the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey–School of Osteopathic Medicine in Stratford (Herring) and the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston (Shah).

Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicate that more than 20 million people (approximately 7% of the population) in the United States have diabetes mellitus. Physicians often fail to examine the mouths and teeth of their patients, even though the condition of the mouth and teeth have clinical relevance for the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus. The authors examine the current state of knowledge regarding periodontal disease and the effect of periodontal disease on worsening of glycemic control. They review several studies investigating how the management of periodontal disease affects the ability of patients to control symptoms of diabetes mellitus. The authors conclude with several recommendations for the treatment of patients with periodontal disease to improve glycemic control.

A physician's examination of the mouth usually involves a "Say `Ahh...'" and a quick look at the pharynx. Unfortunately, this brief examination is likely to miss important, clinically relevant information.1,2 For example, periodontal disease has the potential to have an adverse impact on glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus. Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicate that more than 20 million people (approximately 7% of the population) in the United States have diabetes mellitus.3 Diabetes mellitus remains undiagnosed in more than 6 million of these individuals, according to CDC estimates.3 Figure 1 lists a number of medical conditions, including periodontitis, gingivitis, lesions, and pigmentation changes, that can be revealed with a thorough examination of the mouth. Family physicians need to recognize how such conditions can affect various disease processes, including that of diabetes mellitus, and refer their patients to dentists for evaluation and treatment when necessary.
http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/content/full/106/7/416

What is Doxycycline?
Doxycycline is a member of the tetracycline antibiotics group and is commonly used to treat a variety of infections. Doxycycline is a semi-synthetic tetracycline invented and clinically developed in the early 1960s by Pfizer Inc.  and marketed under the brand name Vibramycin. Vibramycin received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 1967, becoming Pfizer's first once-a-day broad-spectrum antibiotic. Other brand names include Monodox, Microdox, Periostat, Vibra-Tabs, Oracea, Doryx, Vibrox, Adoxa, Doxyhexal, Doxylin, and Atridox (topical doxycycline hyclate for periodontitis).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxycycline

Tetracycline Treatment Retards the Onset and Slows the Progression of Diabetes in Human Amylin/Islet Amyloid Polypeptide Transgenic Mice
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19794060l

Tetracycline administration increases collagen synthesis in osteoblasts of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats: A quantitative autoradiographic study
Streptozotocin-induced, insulin-deficient diabetic rats were administrated either minocycline (MC) or a chemically modified non-antimicrobial tetracycline (CMT) by oral gavage for a 3-week period;...These results suggest that the diabetes-induced suppression of synthesis and secretion of protein (presumably collagen and its precursor) by osteoblasts can be restored to near-normal levels by administration of tetracycline(s) and that this effect is mediated by a non-antimicrobial property of these antibiotics.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/32l15576j4034655/

Tetracycline-regulated secretion of human (pro)insulin following plasmid-mediated transfection of human muscle
http://jme.endocrinology-journals.org/cgi/content/full/34/2/391

JM

JM - Journal of Mammalogy
THE NATURAL HISTORY CONUNDRUM REVISITED: MAMMALOGY BEGINS AT HOME
PETER D. WEIGL* Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston–Salem, NC 27109, USA
This commentary is the text of an oral presentation delivered at the 88th Annual Meeting of the American Society
of Mammalogists in Brookings, South Dakota, on 22 June 2008 to recognize receipt of the Joseph Grinnell
Award for Excellence in Education in Mammalogy. Much has been written by previous recipients of the Joseph
Grinnell Award about the declining interest in natural history and organismic biology in academia and in society
in general. In the course of 40 years of university teaching and student advising, as well as field research with
students on 5 continents, I too have witnessed this increasing abandonment of the natural world. This
phenomenon seems to stem from changes in the early experiences of children and young people over the past
40 years and, thus, I would advance the premise that mammalogy and other branches of natural history begin at home. Three types of learning seem important to the developing mind. First is the time and opportunity for
unstructured, unforced exploration of the local environment—time to develop from the inside out rather than
merely as a shell coated with a number of intellectual veneers. Second is learning from the example and caring
instruction of enthusiastic parents, teachers, and mentors. Third is the transfer of information—from personal
experience, reading, teaching, and selectively from a vast array of electronic sources—once again with time for
synthesis and contemplation. All 3 types of learning appear to be critical to an appreciation of the natural world. Unfortunately, these processes have been grossly distorted by the loss of outdoor experience, by parental fears and ambitions, and by a kind of electronic idolatry associated with constant entertainment, instant gratification, and virtual relationships. Such an upbringing may affect not only a child's physical and mental health, but his or her future commitment to preserving the natural world as an adult. Published studies of ''nature deficit disorder'' and ''videophilia'' now describe this phenomenon and challenge families, schools, and scientific organizations torespond in a timely way.

There also is a strong link between the life of sedentary, indoor kids and a national epidemic of obesity and diabetes. Add to this an almost complete ignorance about foods—their sources, variety, and quality—as revealed in the writings of Pollan (2006, 2008), Kingsolver (2007), and even Wendell Berry (1977, 1987) and the disconnect between the culture and its support system is even clearer.
http://www.bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1644/08-MAMM-S-232.1

Statistics
Data from the 2007 National Diabetes Fact Sheet (the most recent year for which data is available)
Total: 23.6 million children and adults in the United States—7.8% of the population—have diabetes.
Diagnosed: 17.9 million people
Undiagnosed: 5.7 million people
Pre-diabetes: 57 million people
New Cases: 1.6 million new cases of diabetes are diagnosed in people aged 20 years and older each year.

Total prevalence of diabetes
Under 20 years of age
* 186,300, or 0.22% of all people in this age group have diabetes
* About 1 in every 400 to 600 children and adolescents has type 1 diabetes
* About 2 million adolescents aged 12-19 have pre-diabetes

Age 20 years or older
* 23.5 million, or 10.7% of all people in this age group have diabetes

Age 60 years or older
* 12.2 million, or 23.1% of all people in this age group have diabetes

Men
* 12.0 million, or 11.2% of all men aged 20 years or older have diabetes

Women
* 11.5 million, or 10.2% of all women aged 20 years or older have diabetes

Race and ethnic differences in prevalence of diagnosed diabetes
After adjusting for population age differences, 2004-2006 national survey data for people diagnosed with diabetes, aged 20 years or older include the following prevalence by race/ethnicity:
* 6.6% of non-Hispanic whites
* 7.5% of Asian Americans
* 11.8% of non-Hispanic blacks
* 10.4% of Hispanics

Among Hispanics rates were:
* 8.2% for Cubans
* 11.9% for Mexican Americans
* 12.6% for Puerto Ricans.

Morbidity and Mortality
Deaths
Diabetes was the seventh leading cause of death listed on U.S. death certificates in 2006. This ranking is based on the 72,507 death certificates in 2006 in which diabetes was listed as the underlying cause of death. According to death certificate reports, diabetes contributed to a total of 233,619 deaths in 2005, the latest year for which data on contributing causes of death are available.

Complications
Heart disease and stroke
• In 2004, heart disease was noted on 68% of diabetes-related death certificates among people aged 65 years or older.
• In 2004, stroke was noted on 16% of diabetes-related death certificates among people aged 65 years or older.
• Adults with diabetes have heart disease death rates about 2 to 4 times higher than adults without diabetes.
• The risk for stroke is 2 to 4 times higher among people with diabetes.

High blood pressure
• In 2003–2004, 75% of adults with self-reported diabetes had blood pressure greater than or equal to 130/80 mmHg, or used prescription medications for hypertension.

Blindness
• Diabetes is the leading cause of new cases of blindness among adults aged 20–74 years.
• Diabetic retinopathy causes 12,000 to 24,000 new cases of blindness each year.

Kidney disease
• Diabetes is the leading cause of kidney failure, accounting for 44% of new cases in 2005.
• In 2005, 46,739 people with diabetes began treatment for end-stage kidney disease in the United States and Puerto Rico.
• In 2005, a total of 178,689 people with end-stage kidney disease due to diabetes were living on chronic dialysis or with a kidney transplant in the United States and Puerto Rico.

Nervous system disease (Neuropathy)
• About 60% to 70% of people with diabetes have mild to severe forms of nervous system damage.

Amputation
• More than 60% of nontraumatic lower-limb amputations occur in people with diabetes.
• In 2004, about 71,000 nontraumatic lower-limb amputations were performed in people with diabetes.

Cost of Diabetes
$174 billion: Total costs of diagnosed diabetes in the United States in 2007
* $116 billion for direct medical costs
* $58 billion for indirect costs (disability, work loss, premature mortality)

After adjusting for population age and sex differences, average medical expenditures among people with diagnosed diabetes were 2.3 times higher than what expenditures would be in the absence of diabetes.

The American Diabetes Association has created a Diabetes Cost Calculator that takes the national cost of diabetes data and provides estimates at the state and congressional district level.

Factoring in the additional costs of undiagnosed diabetes, pre-diabetes, and gestational diabetes brings the total cost of diabetes in the United States in 2007 to $218 billion.
• $18 billion for the 6.3 million people with undiagnosed diabetes
• $25 billion for the 57 million American adults with pre-diabetes
• $623 million for the 180,000 pregnancies where gestational diabetes is diagnosed
http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-basics/diabetes-statistics/

[TinkerBell_777]

Thank you Serenitys_Dream for all your thorough analysis and the discovered connections. Apparently, the common concept of the revealed acronyms is DIABETES, which numerologically decoded is 4-9-1-2-5-20-5-19, summing up 11 (this number again)!

According to wikipedia, "The term diabetes was coined by Aretaeus of Cappadocia. It was derived from the Greek verb  diabaínein, itself formed from the prefix dia-, "across, apart," and the verb bainein, "to walk, stand." The verb diabeinein meant "to stride, walk, or stand with legs asunder"; hence, its derivative diabetes meant "one that straddles," or specifically "a compass, siphon."

Also, the anagram of DIABETES is BEADIEST, usually referring to eyes.

Any opinions/ideas on the reasons why this could represent a hidden message?

LOVE,
Andy

[MissG]

Any opinions/ideas on the reasons why this could represent a hidden message?

I see some logic in it; If MJ was diabetic,that would explain:
- Neddle marks on his body.
- Loss of sight (view).
- Pancreatic related illnesses (others than diabetes) that leads to pain.

[longlivetheking]

Any opinions/ideas on the reasons why this could represent a hidden message?

I see some logic in it; If MJ was diabetic,that would explain:
- Neddle marks on his body.
- Loss of sight (view).
- Pancreatic related illnesses (others than diabetes) that leads to pain.

don't forget MJ's medical id bracelet too...this could have been worn for diabetes???  as a diabetic i usually give myself the insulin injection in my stomach and/or my outer, upper thigh - i use the smallest needle possible since I am 150% needle phobic - i haven't really noticed any needle marks from my insulin injections, but everyone is different and there are different sizes in gage so anything is possible.

any thoughts on the date & the time of the post 7/18/10 @ 7:18AM????