0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
'Biological Son' of Michael Jackson Rejected4/13/2010 9:49 AM PDT by TMZ StaffOne of the creditor's claims the Michael Jackson estate has rejected was filed by a 25-year-old man who says he's the biological son of the late singer.Prince Michael Malachi Jet Jackson had filed a claim with the estate, but he's not asking for money -- he wants a DNA test proving he's MJ's flesh and blood.But as we first reported, Howard Weitzman, lawyer for the estate, formally rejected a bunch of claims yesterday, including the one from P.M.M.J.J.We're told more rejections are coming, so stay tuned.You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I may be way off here but maybe this part means something. This seems to be one big game of chess."but she'll have to make a serious move (as in location) to make that happen."Maybe we are playing the right pieces but the wrong location. As I say, I may be way off but maybe trying to get Harvey to talk about this is the wrong move. Maybe we need to do something towards TMZ but in a different way???
OMG I'm rubbish at chess!! Seriously, I'm baffled with this one.Can I just ask something about these TIAI redirects? I notice Mo or Souza usually post them, but today's was from JukeBox. I'd always thought they were coming from TS via admin/mods. Who decides what we need to look at and focus on? Sorry if this a stupid question, but I need to know!
Quote from: "Believe 777"I may be way off here but maybe this part means something. This seems to be one big game of chess."but she'll have to make a serious move (as in location) to make that happen."Maybe we are playing the right pieces but the wrong location. As I say, I may be way off but maybe trying to get Harvey to talk about this is the wrong move. Maybe we need to do something towards TMZ but in a different way???I think this is an important phrase, "have to make a serious move ... to make that happen", together with the first 2 words: "Forget DNA"! As in forget the DNA evidence or argument? I'm still trying to figure this out...LOVE,Andy
Quote from: "TinkerBell_777"Quote from: "Believe 777"I may be way off here but maybe this part means something. This seems to be one big game of chess."but she'll have to make a serious move (as in location) to make that happen."Maybe we are playing the right pieces but the wrong location. As I say, I may be way off but maybe trying to get Harvey to talk about this is the wrong move. Maybe we need to do something towards TMZ but in a different way???I think this is an important phrase, "have to make a serious move ... to make that happen", together with the first 2 words: "Forget DNA"! As in forget the DNA evidence or argument? I'm still trying to figure this out...LOVE,Andyyea it's funny... TS was pointing out about DNA being concrete, scientific evidence that is hard to rebuke.. even if the girl in the TMZ article is a chess genius so what? it doesn't prove 100% that she's Bobby's daughter, right? I mean, anyone could be really really good in chess.i still don't know what we're supposed to do though...
yea it's funny... TS was pointing out about DNA being concrete, scientific evidence that is hard to rebuke.. even if the girl in the TMZ article is a chess genius so what? it doesn't prove 100% that she's Bobby's daughter, right? I mean, anyone could be really really good in chess.i still don't know what we're supposed to do though...
