0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Why would the Jackson family tell them to say that I wonder ? " They Don't Have His Body And Never Did" Don't they want us to think he is dead and isn't that where we were told he was laid to rest. I don't know about you but I smell something in the air and it's not roses it smells kind of FISHY to me.
I have called FL again, and this is what they said.i asked them if there will be any sort of event at FL.and they said no! they said all the news reports are false, and i told them that a friends of mine called them to require about mj's body, and FL responded, that they don't have MJ'S BODY and never had it.and the guy told me that they were responding to enquiries according to what the JACKSON FAMILY wanted them to respond, this was then and this is now he said.he said that they are responding according to what the Jackson Family want them to say.they also said that FL will be opened, but access to the grave is forbidden,he told me that the JACKSON FAMILY don't want anyone closed to where michael Grave is.You can call him if you want If you don't believe me .CALL THERE , HIS NAME IS CLIFFORD.ASK for CLIFFORD.Ask him about The event etc...Phone1-800-204-3131International1-323-254-3131
Could be a dummy in the grave.... :roll: Chappie
And we know all about the way Larry King Feels "Oh he's still dead isn't he???" and certainly not forgetting how he kept looking all skeptical and weird talking to "Dave Dave" :roll:
This was the same issue that was proposed by fellow death hoax investigator Tom Pickering who called forest lawn one day and got the same exact response as the first post indicates. Not sure what his opinion was about the matter, but you can find this call and his explanation on his "codeofthriller" account in either death hoax videos he uploaded.As for the email, I would assume that the response is far from accurate and it is not in there policy to discuss who is interred where and why. The biggest issue is the difference between phone and email. Email is indirect and it is way too easy to mislead an audience or potential individual into thinking one thing, whereas it is a bit more difficult on the phone to do such an act. I think it just could be for legality reasons that when you call, you'll be able to find out who is on the other end of the line, and if they are telling you one thing, they could find themselves in a lot of trouble, but this is only a guess. I'm no lawyer nor do I understand the legal system completely, but something tells me that this particular incident is fishy, meaning, I wholeheartedly believe that the man on the phone was telling the truth whereas the email was just a fib.
PinkTopaz: I really do admire your optimisim and if I ever need cheering up I just read your posts. Some of the current happenings just have me feeling a bit like a 3 headed dog......which you know.....come to think of it that might be what Murray is!!!!