0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I really think I need to reformat my hard drive ...the one in my head :shock: :lol: :lol: All these theories,all interesting but don't know what to think anymore... my braincells are working overtime :shock: I think I lost a few in the archange topic :lol: :lol:
Quote from: "AnnieIsNotOK"I really think I need to reformat my hard drive ...the one in my head :shock: :lol: :lol: All these theories,all interesting but don't know what to think anymore... my braincells are working overtime :shock: I think I lost a few in the archange topic :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: you are not alone trust me,im changing my name to headless chicken NO1,i have a feeling there will be a few more :lol: :lol:
Quote from: "hope"Mmmmm, I kinda thought the family would have made arrangements for Brandon to be brought to the mausoleum to be with Michael. Maybe they have and its just not being publicized. But , speaking for myself, I would want both of my deceased children together, and considering that Brandon was an infant, I wouldnt tyhink it would be that difficult. I have always thought about this and is why, at forst, I thought maybe they WOULD have buried Michael in Indiana. They "supposedly" bought 12 plots. Could the 12th plot be for Brandon ? :?But we don't think Michael is at the mausoleum-he isn't dead. don't mean to cause offence and be obnoxious but this is a hoax site and in some posts members speak as if he is actually dead.Also I do not think the 12 plots have any bearing as most married couples when they die are buried together so are we to assume that the Brothers and their wives will be squashed in one grave?
Mmmmm, I kinda thought the family would have made arrangements for Brandon to be brought to the mausoleum to be with Michael. Maybe they have and its just not being publicized. But , speaking for myself, I would want both of my deceased children together, and considering that Brandon was an infant, I wouldnt tyhink it would be that difficult. I have always thought about this and is why, at forst, I thought maybe they WOULD have buried Michael in Indiana. They "supposedly" bought 12 plots. Could the 12th plot be for Brandon ? :?
Yes, I know, but that is my point, all of this information was added to wikipedia only after it was mentioned at the memorial. There is no existence of this information prior to 2009.
Most interesting! If this is true, this would totally explain why there is a tendency by the Jacksons to say things like "my brother has passed" rather than using Michael's name. I'm assuming that there would be a death certificate for the stillborn child.
Not sure if the same rules apply in USA as in UK but here in UK it is illeagle and has been since the GRO index's started back in 1837 not to register still births. some times a baby was registered as only by the surname as in male smith female smith but leagally all births whether live or stillborn had to be registered. this was then followed by a registered death. I am a proffesional genealogist by proffesion and in all the years of my researching (which feels like centuries lol) the only times i have come accross unregistered deaths or births is when dodgy dealings are going on. Hope that helps in some way
Started by mykidsmum Michael's Impersonators
Started by looking4truth Other Odd Things
Started by Natte Other Odd Things
Started by DancingTheDream « 1 2 » Michael Jackson News
Started by ladylee1979 Michael Jackson News