0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I think its fake, IMO. Nobody knows why he did it, end of discussion!
Quote from: "samsuperb"I think its fake, IMO. Nobody knows why he did it, end of discussion!Agreed. This line is very telling that this is fake."Although the alphabet for the manuscript has been discovered, the code has not yet been cracked."For instance if you have the alphabet of this "gibberish language" it means you know A = 1 B = 2 etc. So if you know that then to decode it you would just replace the numbers/symbols what have you with the proper letters. Any missing things such as numbers that you don't know would most likely be able to be deciphered by reading the information obtained by having already done this replacement.
Quote from: "Serenitys_Dream"Quote from: "samsuperb"I think its fake, IMO. Nobody knows why he did it, end of discussion!Agreed. This line is very telling that this is fake."Although the alphabet for the manuscript has been discovered, the code has not yet been cracked."For instance if you have the alphabet of this "gibberish language" it means you know A = 1 B = 2 etc. So if you know that then to decode it you would just replace the numbers/symbols what have you with the proper letters. Any missing things such as numbers that you don't know would most likely be able to be deciphered by reading the information obtained by having already done this replacement....wow... what a coincidence because of my Alphabet Routine. So does this means that this is reliable or not :?: :?: :?:
Quote from: "reasonables+luvs+MJ"Quote from: "Serenitys_Dream"Quote from: "samsuperb"I think its fake, IMO. Nobody knows why he did it, end of discussion!Agreed. This line is very telling that this is fake."Although the alphabet for the manuscript has been discovered, the code has not yet been cracked."For instance if you have the alphabet of this "gibberish language" it means you know A = 1 B = 2 etc. So if you know that then to decode it you would just replace the numbers/symbols what have you with the proper letters. Any missing things such as numbers that you don't know would most likely be able to be deciphered by reading the information obtained by having already done this replacement....wow... what a coincidence because of my Alphabet Routine. So does this means that this is reliable or not :?: :?: :?: In my opinion the Pewter manuscript is fake but your alphabet routine is spot on :lol: