This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - mmz
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 27
31
« on: July 05, 2010, 03:47:15 PM »
look at the top picture on the left first page..DOn't you think there Michael is veryyyy similar to Omar Bhatti?
32
« on: July 05, 2010, 03:44:16 PM »
...As I said .it is a great job!!
Just one question...why do you think Michael would have wore such a large shoulder jacket for impersonating Dave Dave? Michael has not so big shoulders..I mean..they are normal...
Do you think he did it for making the thing a bit unreal?
33
« on: July 05, 2010, 03:31:07 PM »
..i don't blame Tatiana...if I was on that stage I would have done the same  ...who cares to be professional if you have in front Michael?  :lol:
34
« on: July 05, 2010, 03:18:56 PM »
Pleaaassseee... I respect people believing in the double theory,but don't use irony that can somehow hurt...I feel very sorry when I read bad things about the one that you call "the imposter"...Really... It hurts me a lot. I don't want to convince you,but i just ask you to keep a 1% of chance that it was all Michael,and in that case you maybe would use different words. I know in TII movie we see some different moves, some different attitudes,not so typical of the Michael we have been knowing years ago... But Michael is an artist!!He develops! he works on himself...on new steps...different steps! ANd...he grows up!! You cannot expect him to move as when he was 10,20,30,40. He worked his life long hours and hours everyday on dancing,and do you think he just repeated same steps? This is very naif to think. As I repeat...just keep 1%,or 0,5% of chance it could be him.. This will help people such as me not to feel hurt reading some posts. I tell you this in peace...hope you understand. I never said anything about it, but this time,I had to...sorry.
35
« on: July 05, 2010, 02:46:54 PM »
I don't want tto be rude..but ...I guess lot of the luxury in that house has been paid with Michael money...everybody knows that MJ passed money to the family all his life long...
36
« on: July 02, 2010, 03:57:48 PM »
...there has been a thread about Michael forcing his voice to make it sound different when talking... I posted that I didn't care about it...Michael has a great voice,and he can do whatever he wants with that gift that God has given to him. Michael sings while talking...and he can reach the notes he wants.It always sounds melody. After this intro,I want you to listen to this grammy 1986 appearence You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login...First time I heard,it little shocked me,since I was used to recent interviews..and this sounds very different! It is Michael ,of course. 1 year later ,he releases the Jet interview You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login...and the voice gets little deeper. As someone has commented,voice can change depending on mood,moment of the day, emotions.. but ..we are starting to realize that Michael really is a genius,and I think he can change his tone of voice while talking,as he does while singing! This is inteded to be not a negative critic..on the contrary...I call it TALENT!!!! Think at the major in ghost,think at possible Dave Dave at LKL... Ps DOn't you think he is so sweet at 1:30 in Grammy video? And jet interview,is one of the one I like the most... the real meaning of this thread is: enjoy the Man!!
37
« on: July 02, 2010, 09:48:33 AM »
...I don't care if Cris used eyes drops for faking cry...but it is interesting to think that when we saw jermaine or other jackson family member crying,they should have use it!!
38
« on: July 02, 2010, 09:21:17 AM »
you really did a great job!!!!!
I am not so sure of Michael disguised as Dave Dave,but this comparison really makes me consider once again the possibility!
39
« on: July 02, 2010, 04:29:11 AM »
..had thome thome disappeared? Have you seen him around after 25?Or released interviews?
40
« on: July 02, 2010, 04:12:53 AM »
To admin:
This has same value as BOW prediction. All predictions means nothing,until they happen.(or don't happen).
41
« on: June 30, 2010, 09:41:10 AM »
Guys new video..Well just 0:29 sec audio of MJ singing acapella ...
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login to me..it sounds recent! Moreover...I think there must be something in we are the world remake...the green men,and the chance it was recorded in Neverlan...and now this video of Michael singing it...it is not a coincidence for me..
42
« on: June 30, 2010, 09:34:41 AM »
It wasn't odd at all. He did that all the time in all concerts after singing the J5 songs, i can remember he said these same words in BAD tour, Dangerous tour. He points at the mike stands and there goes a spot light, he says his brothers' names and parent's names and says he loves them, after singing "i'll be there". In all concerts, not in TII only. No hidden message there, unfortunately. :| yes,I know! But..don't you find strange that he says that during rehearsals? Check at dangerous or bad era rehearsals...completely different style. He never "entertained" so much during rehearsals.. in TII movie,it all seems to be done for the movie,not for a coming concert. If we pay attention,ALL details (big effects,the mirror man at the beginning,the real show it had to be at 02 arena..)related to the tour are missing.Not ready yet. In TII there is mainly Michael,the Man,and him dancing and singing full songs. And the videos from the DOME project,that I think will mean something more in the next future. The tour was not ready yet. that to say,I still find a hidden message there.. plus..notice...let's suppose Michael was really under drugs effects...he would have done the less he could do...not more than just a rehearsal. And not say the words he was going to say during the real tour. It was a clean mind that was speaking there,not a disturbed man one.
43
« on: June 30, 2010, 09:22:02 AM »
honestly,this makes me sad. For those wondering where are the sunflowers..sunflowers have a short life,and they cannot be there anymore of course.
ANd the crypt is not photoshopped..the comparison of the 2 pictures doesn't work.They are shot form differnet point of views..on higher,one lower.
:cry:
44
« on: June 29, 2010, 05:11:10 PM »
I was thinking at TII movie...after the jackson 5 medley..
Michael tells his brothers,and Katherine,and joe...I love you.
When I first watched the movie,I found strange he mixed parents with brothers,not including the sisters. After the medley,it would have had more sense to talk of the brothers, but ..maybe he just meant all the family..but in that case...why he didn't name the sisters?
MOreover..and most important:
-those were supposed to be rehearsals...isn't it strange he adresses to the family in that situation?
Like if the family could really listen to his words?Or like if there was an audience?I don't know if I explained what I mean...
This is I think a possible interpretation for that part in the movie:
- Michael knew it was going to be a movie,and wants his family know he loves them,no matter what (no matter if he had to fake his death,and loves them because he knows in short days they will have to start lying,and play the role.Like " I love you,beacuse you are going to help me in all this"
His brothers have been the firsts from the beginning to play a role in the hoax (the firsts to thank),then mother and Joe (it is a hard job for Kat and Joe to lye on his son).
Janet doesn't say a lot in the hoax...she sent clues just while performing,and during an interview (released lot of time after Michael HD)...maybe at the beginning she didn't want to take part to it,or she didn't know,as for the other sisters.
I think everything in TII movie has a meaning in the hoax..the songs chosen,the words Michael says... And I think this part really means something. And...doesn't really fit if those were really just "rehearsals" for a tour.
45
« on: June 26, 2010, 03:34:58 PM »
Because I believe that Michael was really afraid for his life and is hoaxing because of a very serious issue, I don't believe not even 1% that he would risk making an appearance to speak at an event such as the one held in Gary yesterday. I believe if Michael ever makes a speech, it will be via satellite or some other process, not in person. It's too dangerous. agree...I am waiting for a new disguise..but..IMO this is not Michael. Funny conection,anyway..
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 27
|
Show Posts
