This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Galaxy
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
46
« on: April 08, 2011, 08:22:41 PM »
All of these stories of Alejandra are garbage, now she undertakes to leave the house, no more fights for this, and as the demands that have been submitted are only a way of being in the news Agree!
47
« on: April 08, 2011, 10:02:25 AM »
I have always felt that Murray's character was the representation of Michael in some ways. When Murray said, "That's my children, I love them," it reminded me of a part in the tapes Michael did with Rabbi Shmuley, when he talked about sort of being a universal father.
BOTEACH: Do you feel like a universal father to children, that you have this ability to love them and appreciate them?
JACKSON: Yes.
BOTEACH: In a way that others don't?
JACKSON: Yes. And I always feel that I don't want the parents to get jealous. It happens sometimes. And it rubs fathers in a strange way, not as much as the mothers.
I always say to the dads, I'm not trying to take your place. I'm just trying to help. I want to be a friend.
And the kids end up just falling in love with my personality. Sometimes it gets me into trouble. I'm just there to help.
48
« on: April 07, 2011, 09:28:51 PM »
I am figuring that you would probably have to look deeply into the 2005 trial to see some of the comparisons and statements that Michael wants to make with this upcoming trial. For example, Murray not wanting the autopsy photos shown can be likened to Michael not wanting his 1993 strip search photos shown during the 2005 trial. As far as the strip clubs and the women Murray supposedly dealt with are concerned, these things could be considered a rather personal decision that has nothing to do with him giving Michael Propofol, in comparison to the 2005 trial when the prosecution seized Michael's porno magazines just to embarrass him in court, even though it had nothing to do with the case.
updated 5/26/2005 3:14:39 PM ET 2005-05-26T19:14:39 Share Print Font: + - SANTA MARIA, Calif. — The judge in the Michael Jackson molestation trial Thursday spared jurors from seeing a graphic piece of evidence when he barred prosecutors from showing photographs of the pop star’s genitalia.
In another ruling, the judge said prosecutors can play a videotape of the accuser’s original police interview in 2003 in a bid to show that the boy’s story has been consistent. Defense lawyers said that if the prosecution shows the tape, the defense would want to call the boy back for questioning. They also may call the boy’s mother.
The attempt to admit the genitalia photographs stems from a 1993 molestation investigation of Jackson. When prosecutors were trying to gather evidence against the singer back then, they served a subpoena at his home that allowed them to photograph his genitalia.
They then had the accuser draw a picture of what he thought the genitalia looked like. Prosecutors claimed the picture contained a blemish that was unique to Jackson’s anatomy.
Arguing for use of the pictures, Senior Deputy District Attorney Ron Zonen said the prosecution wanted to show jurors a child’s description “of a unique feature of his (Jackson’s) anatomy.” He said it would show that Jackson’s relationships with boys were “not casual.”
But defense attorney Robert Sanger called the photographs an “unfair surprise” and said prosecutors had “not even hinted that they were going to try this tactic in advance.” He cited a U.S. Supreme Court decision which says a judge is supposed to avoid dramatic evidence at the end of a trial that could be prejudicial.
“This is really a stretch to come up with any kind of reason to bring this in as evidence,” Sanger said, arguing that it would be “very shocking” for the jury to see.
The boy in the 1993 investigation and his family eventually received a multimillion-dollar settlement from Jackson and no charges were filed. That boy is now a young man and has been unavailable to serve as a witness in Jackson’s trial.
Jackson, 46, is charged with molesting a 13-year-old boy in February or March 2003, giving him wine and conspiring to hold his family captive to get them to rebut a documentary in which the boy appeared with Jackson as the entertainer said he let children into his bed but it was non-sexual.
The defense wrapped up its case Wednesday, and the trial is now in the rebuttal phase. The jury could get the case next week.
49
« on: March 26, 2011, 12:22:15 PM »
Remember, this WHOLE thing is a hoax!
50
« on: March 25, 2011, 09:34:41 PM »
:lol:
51
« on: March 21, 2011, 04:23:59 PM »
Twitter Death Hoaxes Search: Eminem Eminem is the latest in a long list of celebrities rumored to have died. Not so -- the Detroit hip-hop star is alive and well. Whose supposed tweets started the rumor? What was up with the Twitter account? What's Eminem's social-networking claim to fame? Click ahead to read about other celebs targeted by death hoaxes, including: Aretha Franklin Russell Crowe Lindsay Lohan You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
52
« on: March 20, 2011, 08:57:43 PM »
53
« on: March 20, 2011, 08:41:15 PM »
I think ecology wasn't the only thing MJ meant saying this sentence... I guess he could have had politics and wars on his mind....
I kind of believed that he was referring to politics as well when he made that statement.
Ok, I might have to change my belief on this. What a difference a day makes.
54
« on: March 20, 2011, 06:17:07 PM »
Do you remember all of the Liberian Girl pictures at the memorial and funeral ? In Liberian Girl, Mj was behind the camera which is probably where he's at in these videos. I'm sure Michael had a great deal of say in the elements that were put together in these recent videos, but speaking of Liberian Girl, I wonder if James Yukich and Kenny Ortega had bounced any ideas off of each for the memorial? Remember, James Yukich was the director of Liberian Girl and he also worked with Kenny Ortega on High School Musical The Concert. The memorial to me kind of had a Liberian Girl theme to it. Michael is directing this whole thing.
55
« on: March 20, 2011, 03:23:03 PM »
I am curious as to when most of the pictures and footage of Dr. Murray was REALLY taken. I can't believe that he can just walk down the street or anywhere he pleases these days.
56
« on: March 19, 2011, 03:38:35 PM »
57
« on: March 19, 2011, 03:27:21 PM »
I think ecology wasn't the only thing MJ meant saying this sentence... I guess he could have had politics and wars on his mind.... I kind of believed that he was referring to politics as well when he made that statement.
58
« on: March 15, 2011, 09:05:35 PM »
Even though Michael is just using this STORY as another way to keep his name in the headlines, can the Jackson Estate please just kick her out anyway.
59
« on: March 15, 2011, 05:34:53 PM »
These tapes have been talked about since 2009; so, I am pretty inclined to believe that there is something rather significant to these surveillance videos. Will we see Michael on them or not? That's what I want to know.
60
« on: March 13, 2011, 08:03:59 PM »
The following video has 6 parts and this is just the first part of it. Even though it's not spoken in English, it's still enjoyable to watch. [youtube:3qaqjhf9]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mILb6-hejxQ[/youtube:3qaqjhf9]
|