Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - foreverking

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 14
61
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: July 20, 2010, 11:16:53 AM »
It may be interesting to investigate who owns MJJC and who are the people protecting BACK. My husband is a private investigator and in security and he always says, if you want to find or uncover, start at a good source and go back or go forward and at the end or the beginning is your answer.

62
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: July 20, 2010, 02:30:11 AM »
Here is the link I hope it works.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

scroll down the page and you will find BACK's post

63
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: July 20, 2010, 02:00:26 AM »
I was able to look through the post and found one of the last one post by BACK on June 2 2010. The thread was about the kids signing belts for charity:

Sometimes when bands ASSume they are in unisome, at least one member will be attentive enough to realize they are actually offbeat. It is also a bitter pill to swallow when that "imperfection" is pointed out.

For those that consider themselves sanctioned experts regarding the lives of a very large and famous FAMILY, perhaps your credentials need thorough auditing in order to find out just what went wrong. To put it nicely, there's ignorance to reality, transfixion on sensationalism and much "assuming" of oneself into circles.

With the clapping being a little offkey, could an expert please tell me if Michael APPROVED of "THIS IS IT" the motion picture? That is since this narrative continues to surface and the band knows what he REALLY wanted.

Also, Respect is earned you say?

Well Levin, Anka, McClain, Branca, Botek and many more must be "EARNING" it in droves.

Aren't they?

Experts only please!

Also, let the experts tell us or at least attempt to dissect the differences between the vast amount of people "EARNING" it?

Even this website! winkRespect doesn't come cheap, does it?

The qualifier for NOT earning it appears to be blood!

Threats are of no cosequence in this day and age; at least that's what many believe.

But I promise, not only Mr. Taylor, but to those who sincerely believe in the ORIGINAL intent of this forum, if Katherine Jackson is not given her due respect, we are prepared to tranfer part of the burden we have to bear from these relentless insults right where it belongs. Sadly, most of the disdain originates from an UNLIKELY place! The more I think about it, the greater my agony elevates because I never though it would devolve to such a circumstance. The leadership could help us, but many appear to subliminally support it. Michael wouldn't WANT this I assure you. Me-me-me ness will lead some to the edge before they open their eyes.

Real Talk!


Keep WATCHIN'.......


And the next post

Sanctamonious son of a ....Band.....

And the beat goes on!

Uncoordinated and offkey---as expected.

My points stand, regardless of attempted deflections using miscellaeneous quotes.

The lol's are childish--and irrelevant.

So are clapping emoticons.

Reread and enlighten oneself. Attempts at engaging will lead you astray!

Trust!

Keep WATCHIN'.......  




I clicked on the BACK post to see the other post by him and nothing came up so I think they've removed all of his post from search. Seems strange to me There must be something the board owneres know about BACK that they don't want others to know.

64
General Hoax Talk / Re: Katherine Tweets "Missing YOu Michael"
« on: July 19, 2010, 11:51:07 PM »
Is it verified?  Mother Kate is 80 years old and while I'm sure she keeps up with the happenings of her grandchildren, I can't imagine her tweeting. She's a very traditional woman.  One of the tweets says something like "No worries"  That is not Mother Kate.  If it is her, then someone else is tweeting for her.

65
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: July 19, 2010, 03:32:46 PM »
Can anyone do a search on MJJC for BACK post.  I tried for weeks but nothing comes up. Even if I try by using a keyword like "theory of 7" I get nothing. Maybe it's my computer

66
Michael Jackson News / Re: PETA Slams Janet Jackson Over Fur Campaign
« on: July 17, 2010, 01:37:38 PM »
Eating animals for food and wearing an animal for fashion are two different things. There was a time when man needed the fur of an animal to keep warm, but we've evolved beyond that and no longer need them to survive.

What Janet has done has changed my view of her. She is free to do what she wants and I am free to not support her as an artist. Many celebs wear fur and I think its awful, but to promote it in an ad is beyone awful, it's just sad.

I eat turkey and chicken and sometimes beef, but just as the lion eats the wilderbeast on the serengeti, it's the circle of life. There is no circle in wearing fur.

I don't think MJ would approve, but again she's her own person and free to do what she wants and PETA and others are free to go after her.

67
Other Odd Things / Re: "Dave Dave" is a liar
« on: July 08, 2010, 12:46:46 PM »
And Where are the pics of DD with MJ as an adult? or even as a teenager.  DD has a bunch of pics on  his myspace, but none of hime with MJ. I mean if he really wanted to put to rest the DD was MJ thing, then show the pics of him with MJ to show the differences.

68
Hoax Videos / Re: New video Maura.
« on: July 08, 2010, 12:21:08 PM »
The picture with the blue eye looks like a recent photo of MJ. I mean if he had not faked his death and this picture came out we woule have all thought it was a recent pic. The aged jaw bone, the profile, the sunken cheeks, all look like a recent pic of MJ, and why did this guy who lives in Paris wait a year before bringing out that picture. I saw the video of him pulling it out of box as if he's had in tucked away, waiting for the right time. Well the right time was a year ago.  And I think he had to say the year 1999 because there is proof MJ was in Paris in 1999, that year was used to try and validate the pic.
I like Maura's videos, they make you think. The picture at the end with Janet puzzles me but I do remember Janet laughing during an interview about her brother. She knows her brother is alive and this is all a great adventure.

69
Karen Faye / Re: in on the hoax or not?
« on: July 07, 2010, 11:40:28 PM »
No green screen on the burial. It really happened.

KF may be in on it, but MJ had to fool the world, so maybe he realized he had to also fool those who were once close to him. Remember he fired KF in 2006, but brought her back for the TII tour.  I would guess she had not seen him in a long time when he called her to come back on tour with him.

So I think she's telling the truth when she says she did his makeup, but it took 9 hours to make him look like anything close to what MJ looked like. To her he was this sick, frail, skinny, victimized drug addict so yeah, he would look different than the MJ she knew in 2006. But the truth is, it wasn't MJ, it was his double and a double who could even fool those close to him.

MJ knew KF well enough to maybe not let her in on the hoax, but use her highly emotional personaility to feed the hoax.

70
Michael Jackson News / Re: eathquake in California
« on: July 07, 2010, 07:19:34 PM »
Felt it too. Thought I was getting dizzy and realized it was an earthquake.  Since I grew up here, I'm use to them. You wait to see if it's going to get stronger and when it doesn't you go back to watching Sponge Bob with your kids.

Have to admit it's kind of funny it happened on  7/7

71
Other Odd Things / Re: "Dave Dave" is a liar
« on: July 06, 2010, 08:05:29 PM »
Quote from: "all4loveandbelieve"
Quote from: "Victor"
Quote from: "bluepiggy"
can anyone tell me how did he get his hands like that?
Fake hands ? :lol:  :lol:


I guess the same way they disguised his face. I am a little skeptical.. why would Michael disguise himself like dave dave, what purpose did he have?
To go to the burial at FL and to let us who beLIEve to know that he's out there, we just have to keep watching...

72
June 25, 2010 / Re: Just Curious......
« on: July 06, 2010, 02:07:09 AM »
No kids and no parents at FL but Janet and Randy made a point to show up together and walk in as if to say MJ my brother, we still got your BACK.  I think Mother Kate would have been there if her child was in that tomb and of course the kids are out there having fun in Hawaii...strange indeed.  The fact that the photos of the kids show up one year after his death is just crazy.  I could see if it had been 3 or 4 years, but one year?  No way they should have been there showing respect for their father. His fans were very important to him and many of them walked up that long hill in the hot sun just to say "we remember you", yet his kids and his parents were not there.  I'm telling you MJ is not in that tomb.

73
Other Odd Things / Re: Love Overcomes Virtually Everything
« on: July 04, 2010, 04:42:06 PM »
Thank you for sharing and yes L.O.V.E. coupled with GOD can overcome everything.

74
I read Pearl's book and there were somethings I think were a bit unnecessary,but it's her book and she's free to write what she wants.

What I find interesting about her is that she is the first person who has some close ties with the family who believes MJ is alive and hoaxed his death.

She has proof of her ties to the family with videos and interviews and photos.

Karen of course does not like her due to the reallly bad things she wrote in the book about Karen.  

I know Karen did MJ's make-up, but it took 9 hours and when she was done it has to pass the Randy Jackson test before anyone could see him at the private service.

Karen also sold a pic to TMZ and she is working on a book, along with others who are close to MJ.

The truth about these two is somewhere in the middle. Both know something, one is a beLIEver and the other is not.

75
Hoax Pictures / Re: BEDROOM PHOTO!!!
« on: July 02, 2010, 11:02:15 AM »
Didn't Latoya say he died in Murray's room?   This looks a bit grand for a guest room.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 14
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal