Messages

I've always thought this photo was manipulated by Ben and his crew. Yes, they took a photo of the person in the ambulance and yes they were given a heads up to have someone there that morning, but when they got to the office, Ben realized the photos did not look like the MJ we all know it didn't clearly show MJ so when they heard he was dead, they knew they could make millions, and they fixed it to show the face of MJ. That ghostly face under the paramedic's arm is a result of the "fixing"  Without time to really check their work, and being in a hurry to get the picture out,they left behind that blurred image.

Two MJ's I've always believed MJ had a double who died on June 25th. Three years in the making to find him. MJ and the double become one. How many of us can say we've seen the same MJ over the past 3 years. His chin, his nose, his hair, contantly changing and maybe for a reason. He's sick, he's dying, he's okay. KO sends him home sick, the next two days, he's doing great!  Even the stalking fans noticed a sudden difference in MJ those last few days, but on the 23rd, he was back to dancing and singing. Two MJ's. One sick and getting thinner, the other healhty, but getting thinner to mirror his double. Two autopsies for a reason. One done by the county and they were only looking for something that would have caused his heart failure. They found lungs of someone who smoked and who had a lung disease, hence, the stories of MJ's lung problems 6 months before he dies. This was to validate the lungs when the double died.
The second autopsy done by the family to assure the terminal condition of the double just in case there are some legal issues later.

Two MJ's one died and buried at that unmarked, cold, dark, tomb at FL. The other, alive and living free of the press, the haters, the media and the stalkers. His kids are free to go to school without mask. His mother does not have to worry about her home. He's back on top, a takeover. Vegas shows, successful CD without touring, biggest recording contract in history.

Two MJ's. makes sense to me.

BACK is MJ 100%  He joined that forum because they were once a very well respected forum. The owner, Gaz made sure of that, but once MJ "died" many of the members became bitter towards the family and started to think of MJ as this poor victim who everyone used and died because of Sony, AEG, and all the other users. They seem to have even started blaming his family and yes, even mother Kate who just wanted to put out a postive book about her son, from a mother's view.
It's a shame because MJ was willing to continue to post there under the name BACK, of course not ever saying who he was, but many of the members knew who he was. Some even started attacking BACK for defending mother Kate.
MJ is not a victim. He is not some weak sad drug addict who died because he trusted a doctor he met a few times. He is a man in control who orchestated the greatest show/hoax of all times. He outlined his plan to those who were smart enough and who were willing to think wayyyy outside the box as BACK. He did not share the account. Anyone who knew MJ would know he would never allow someone to have control over something as important as this hoax and BACK was the one who started the 7 day theory and he is the one who continues to run this hoax.
His love for him mother is without conditions. What ever she does is magic to him. So when this board allowed the members to continue to attack her, he left the board and our punishment is his silence.  But he did not name himself BACK for nothing. If we want to know where this hoax is going, just read his post, and I mean really read them. They are filled with riddles and they are filled with the answers to this hoax. MJ is a prankster who loved the mystery and BACK is MJ once and for all.

One of his most popular posts was of the New 7 Day Theory, which was posted by BACK on June 25, 2006 in response to a thread about 2Pac and his seven day theory.

BACK didn't post the Theory of 7 on June 25 2006, he posted it on October 26 2006. At least that's what the print screen shows/

He posted on June 25th 2006 at 11:54 He posted the numbers 62...76...813...21
http://img386.imageshack.us/i/ireland.jpg/
The time stamp is based on the forum time, but it was june 25th 11:54 his time.
He then posted again on Oct 25th the infamous Theory of 7.

The number of letters in the alphabet is 26, so there are 26 people involved.
Latoya,
Jay-z and Beyonce= JB=John Branca
K.O. =Kenny Ortega
Dice and ana= Diana Ross
R.+ Phillips= Randy Phillips
Big Mac=Mcauley Culkin
Jewerly with cm= Conrad Murphy
Simpson Lisa+ Marie+ Presely= Lisa Marie
Crown=Prince
Eiffle Tower= Paris
Blanket=blanket
The picture with Ed, Ed and Eddie (cartoon characters) and the pic of the winter scene. = Ed Winter L.A. county coroner
Queen Elizabeth=+ Taylor = Elizabeth taylor
Teddy bear+cartoon riley= Teddy Riley
Smoke and "meet the Robinsons" = Smokey Robinson
Steve Harvey+ Eddie Murphy= Ed Hardy
K.F. + make up = Karen Faye
Ben+ odd even = Ben Evenstad (took picture of mj in ambulance)
Black eyed peas

There's a whole lot more but they arent so easy to figure out. I don't know what 7 last words has any inside info, but it's entertaining to try to figure out their videos

The queen picture is Elizabeth and the second picture is that of a Taylor.
The Jay-Z is for the J. and the Beyonce is for the B.  JB=John Branca.
The Teddy bear and the Riley character is for Teddy Riley.
Latoya is easy.
The Big Mac is for Mac= Macaulay Culkin.

I'll keep looking at it. It seems this person is giving of a list of people who are involved, but not necessary in on the hoax. Some may not know they are being used to move the hoax forward.

[A PLACE FOR KEEPING FAITH FOR MICHAEL?]

A PLACE FOR KEEPING FAITH FOR MICHAEL?
I haven't even been a user here, since i've only replied once and the topic was deleted shortly by Souza, of course. Probably, Peter's message:

"Contributing to the investigation? 1. I am not an investigator. 2. I DO contribute and will continue to do so........ IN such a way that I feel on "safe terms".... I will NOT sacrifice anyone's privacy or safety in doing so."

.. was  too disturbing and against the policy of this forum. It's been sad to sit and watch for months how much you're hurting your "hero"... out of too much love. But...is it? Love? I am not quite sure if you can detach yourself from all this madness and approach it differently. This is not about Michael Jackson anymore. It's about you. And you don't even realize it!
You are worst than tabloids!
They haven't questioned his death, you have!
I am not sure if he 's alive or not , but i do have the decency to understand that if he indeed faked his death, then his "fans" would be the first supporting him in this by KEEPING THEIR MOUTHS SHUT, not by investigating every ear, wig, hand, body, will, name, children, files, family, friends, lovers, houses, letters, illuminatti, elvis and the list goes on..you know it better.
I've always had the impression that Michael 's fans are the most wonderful people in this world. Well allow me to say: THEY ARE NOT! Or if they are, then i expect too much from the word: " fan". Does fan derives from FANATIC? Maybe in this context you are fans, indeed. But don't ever say you love MICHAEL JACKSON. You just LOVE(D) the artist, the MEGASTAR and NOW, when he needs you the most (assuming his faked death) YOU PROVE IT!!!!
WAKE UP, SELFISH PEOPLE !!!

AND SOUZA, DON'T DARE DELETE MY MESSAGE/TOPIC! Stop acting like a communist! Half truths are worst than a lie and this is what you're giving to your members by banning and locking threads! And weren't you the one doing social experiments by telling people you are MJ? Do you lack memory? If the members just shut up because they're emotionally too attached to this forum that doesnt mean they agree with all this sick mind games and nazi approach!!!!! Now you're banning people for telling the truth?!??  And do you think you can just DELETE US ALL? You may have this forum, but YOU DON'T OWN THE INTERNET, SOUZA!!!
And you, dear members, If you 're doing this for HIS sake, if this is what you call L.O.V.E., go ahead!!! But i'd rather want you to wake up...

And if asking who i am...don't bother...I've never introduced myself because i didnt want to be a part of this strange dictatorial place anyway, not for some other strange, suspicious reason you might think (cause i see everyone is a suspect around this forum...)

I'm not playing with you, i am not a troll and i'm not pretending to be MJ as Souza is suspecting everyone who thinks for him/herself.

I'm just a regular girl watching you..disgusted by the owners of this HOAX.

And to you all..yes keep wathin' too. just make sure it's in the right direction!

I hope you will read this before it gets deleted...Despite my agressive tone, my message is even more peaceful than you think.

L.O.V.E.?

You make some good points, and yes, it should always be about L.O.V.E.

The truth is none of us know the truth about anyone who posts on a forum.  What a member says in PM or in a thread is just a mask we wear on the internet.  But we are not here to reveal ourselves. We are here to find the truth about the hoax. And in order to do this we must all think for ourselves and not let admin, other members or even MJ do our thinking for us.  BJ posted some very interesting post in my opinion and that is my opinion. I read what he or she wrote and I responded.  Who knows who this person is? It could be anyone we don't know. But so what? Just read what they wrote, investigate, absorb, digest, and make your OWN conclusions.  Do not let others think for you. Isn't that what this entire hoax about?  Know what you know, open your mind to the impossible, respect others, tolerate differences (especially opinions) and beLIEve.

I guess "ok" in my opinion is an insult. If someone said that I was just "ok", I would be offended. To me, "ok" means....that you don't hate the person, but you don't particularly like them that much either. Obviously, "ok" means something different to each of us.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion and we should respect each others opinions.

Was this family at the funerals or memorial  :?:

Yes.But they always kept a low profile.

Just a quick thought about the tapes. If there were tapes at Neverland, and there is a good possibility there were tapes, it may have been tricky for the defense to get the tapes into evidence due to problems with verifying the dates and  TS would have challenged them. Also while the tapes may have shown the truth about this family, I would be careful to show footage of kids in MJ's room, however innocent it may have been. If I could win the case without the footage, I would do as TM did. I don't think he wanted to put any unnecessary images in the minds of the jury.

GREAT points! I agree.
EDIT: I agree more with the latter point (not wanting the jury to see unnecessary images), since I believe the tapes would have dates on them... I think dates are an important part of having the security tapes in the first place.

True, but the dates can be manipulated as those on a video camera. Just because it says Dec 3, 2010, doesn't mean it's really that date. It depends on the security system and then there is the question of who had access to the tapes and the camera. You can see I've been involved with cases with security tapes and it does get tricky.

Just a quick thought about the tapes. If there were tapes at Neverland, and there is a good possibility there were tapes, it may have been tricky for the defense to get the tapes into evidence due to problems with verifying the dates and  TS would have challenged them. Also while the tapes may have shown the truth about this family, I would be careful to show footage of kids in MJ's room, however innocent it may have been. If I could win the case without the footage, I would do as TM did. I don't think he wanted to put any unnecessary images in the minds of the jury.

I think BlackJack may be referring to the trial of CM. It may get a little crazy as the so called "truth" is told in that court room. I'm sure many will jump ship and stop beLIEving, but we have to keep the faith and remember why we are here.

BACK knows too much and the date of June 25th three years ago is just too much to be a coincidence.
To understand MJ you have to think wayyyyyyy outside of the box. None of the psychoanalytical models fit him because he lived a life like no other from the time he was about 5 years old.
BACK never asked for followers or even said he was an insider, he simply posted on this board his thoughts and feelings.
I think it's MJ, but the MJ he did not show to the public. His anger was real and justified as MJ but there are other post where he is thoughtful and others where he is the prankster.
He left clues for those who were not only astute enough to understand them, but for those who are able to suspend logic and just beLIEve.

He's a good kid and just like every other 16 year old male he's a bit girl crazy. I think with fame comes haters. It's a true test of success.
He actually reminds me of of Justin Timberlake who has been able to stay the test of time and grow from a teen idol to a pop artist and pretty good actor.
My little girl loves him and he is the only person I've heard give MJ his due for being the innovator he was with Thriller. MJ changed the record industry in the 80's and for this little child to understand that fact, makes him okay with me.