This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - MSMJFANFOREVER
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 ... 35 36 [37]
541
« on: December 09, 2009, 04:58:40 PM »
![]() . . . ![]() . . . ![]() "Thanks for the memories "Q" but..... I got THIS now.. . . ![]() . . . ![]() . . . ![]() . . . ![]() . . . ![]() . . . ![]() . . . . ![]() . . . ![]()
542
« on: December 09, 2009, 04:48:22 PM »
![]() . . . ![]() . . . ![]() . . . ![]() . . . ![]() . . . ![]() . . . ![]() . . . ![]() . . . ![]() . . . ![]() . . . ![]() . . . ![]() . . . ![]()
543
« on: December 09, 2009, 11:03:09 AM »
Again... I think that the fact that they all talk about losing "a" brother/ "thier" brother/ thier "brothers" DEATH.....is open to "INTERPRETATION"!. They could "very well" be referring to Marlon's, twin, "BRANDON". Which would let them off the hook, if MJ does "come back" (they can always say....we never specified, "which" brother we were talking about. Everyone just "assumed", it was, MICHAEL). Whenever they speak of "Michael", it's ALWAYS that he's "gone", or not "here"...etc. To sum this all up..... the ONLY thing that any of the Jacksons are guilty of (if anything), would be a lie of "OMISSION" (ie....not "confirming" that what we were told, was a LIE). If it ever comes to "light"......I would'nt "blame" them for protecting their "brother".... by ANY MEANS NECESSARY! 
544
« on: December 09, 2009, 12:21:26 AM »
 [attachment=1:23xwqpun]MJ comeback.jpg[/attachment:23xwqpun][attachment=0:23xwqpun]Shhhh....jpg[/attachment:23xwqpun]
Hey Michael looks great in white! :lol: "Come back 2010" ![]() Btw.. this is off topic but I would like to ask that, why not one of the Jacksons come to this forum and tell us that Michael is dead, If he's really dead? THAT'S A "GREAT" POINT!You would think that if MJ were "really" DECEASED...that the family would be HIGHLY OFFENDED(to say the least).... by this sites "existance"! I'm sure we would've heard from someone in their "camp", who would be making an OUTCRY over this BLASPHEMY (again, IF Michael IS dead....).
545
« on: December 09, 2009, 12:08:54 AM »
I missed the beginning. Was it explained why "Randy" wasn't there?
To add my two-cents about ambushing the other "3"...
I think, Marlon, is the "weakest" link (I think that he could "succumb" to pressure). Then, Jackie ,(who also seems more "emotional"). Tito, seems most stoic.... followed by ,Jermaine who, you KNOW, ain't giving up NOTHIN'! :lol:
546
« on: December 08, 2009, 11:17:13 PM »
[attachment=1:155iqksj]MJ comeback.jpg[/attachment:155iqksj][attachment=0:155iqksj]Shhhh....jpg[/attachment:155iqksj]
547
« on: December 08, 2009, 10:07:43 PM »
Girl, dont worry about it... I was trying FRANTICALLY, to jot down any questionable, statements as soon as I heard them (like I was a stenographer, in "court"!) I felt like laughing out loud when Larry asked about Joe being involved in or on the upcoming show, and one of the brothers said in a (roundabout way) or maybe "outright"... NO. Probably, because they would'nt want "loose-lips" to say something, he SHOULD'NT, that would let the "cat out of the bag".... :lol: . . . . ![]()
548
« on: December 08, 2009, 09:45:28 PM »
...things are coming to me "after the fact"! Did you hear when LK asked about MJ's "kids" and who the leader was? Jackie said, PRINCE and then emphatically added... AND HE LOVES!!! THE COMPUTER. Then he got cut off by someone else (can't remember). ?! What's "that" got to do with him being the leader? Was that to let us know that he's (Prince) in some of these "forums" with us ? And i'm MAD that LK referred to "Katherine"as "KATHLEEN" (and the brothers let it slide). They should've CORRECTED his as_!!
549
« on: December 08, 2009, 09:24:35 PM »
I, personally, think that the "ambiguity" of their "statements", etc. CONFIRM that MJ is very much "alive" and that they are trying their best to protect that secret.
I did'nt see the beginning, but find it very telling how none of them "have" referred to the event as "Michael's" DEATH. Instead, I keep hearing, "my brothers' DEATH. I know some have said that it's the "same" meaning, but I just can't get past IT, when it's been it has been said CONTINUALLY.
Jermaine was asked by a caller about the Jacksons' "private" MJ memorial service and the details, and Jermaine said that he wouldn't discuss "them" and that they will NOT be discussed on their upcoming show.
When Larry showed them speaking in "retrospect" about MJ's "death", they (?) purposely had each of the brothers statements of "grief" (recorded) and played alongside "footage" from the "burial"...instead of showing them "live" making these "statements". In simpler terms...it's as if they are PURPOSELY NOT ADMITTING TO ANYTHING "SPECIFIC" SURROUNDING MJ'S "DEATH THAT COULD "IMPLICATE" THEM IN THE FUTURE (ie...if MJ resurfaces, one day).
To piggyback on that, i'm curious as to how much LK "knows" (if ANYTHING). He seemed to ask the brothers questions, that MJ "fans" would like to know ....to "pacify" us (?).
But then "conveniently", changes the subject or moves immediately to another brother to answer, if/when the original brother, gets "emotional". IE....asking Jackie about MJ being "dead" (or something to that effect). Jackie starts to "choke" up (unconvincingly, I might add) and then LK, "jumps" to ask Tito the same question (as if to "free" Jackie from having to "fake" sorrow). DID ANYONE NOTICE HOW WHEN "JACKIE'S" VOICE STARTED TO QUIVER...MARLON< HAD AN OBVIOUS 'SMILE' ON HIS FACE? ?!. I'm sorry....that just CANT be explained away LOGICALLY!
BTW- Tito answered (paraphrase)..."well of course, you'd be upset about "losing" your brother (BROTHER ?). Again....may be no big deal to some, but when you put all of the inconsistencies "together".....
They ALL are choosing their words "carefully" and some of the perceived "emotions" just don't seem "consistant" with certain questions. Overall, i'd say that their "answers" and/or "statements" are OPEN TO INTERPRETATION
Most "telling" to me was that Jermaine "volunteered"......he's in very safe keepings now (referring to Michael).
|
Show Posts
.
