This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - keyboardwizz
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6
16
« on: December 08, 2010, 03:35:43 PM »
Ik reageerde op deze thread dus doelde op de doubles/voice impersonators, ben namelijk verbaasd over het feit dat fans hun idool niet herkennen aan hun stem of uiterlijk, en kan me zeker voorstellen dat Michael geniet van de controversy die hij hiermee gecreeerd heeft.
17
« on: December 08, 2010, 03:21:04 PM »
I just want to stop the name calling, if you take the effort to read this whole thread, you could make up your own mind .
18
« on: December 08, 2010, 03:13:06 PM »
Waarschijnlijk gebruikte T Riley de tegenwoordige tijd omdat hij een "believer" is, dus in zijn mindset is hij levend....... En met die controversy zit het wel goed de laatste tijd , als niet fan is het genieten de laatste tijd hierzo 
19
« on: December 08, 2010, 02:55:50 PM »
I don't care about any of this but what I really don't appreciate is being repeatedly fed an elaborate lie to cover one's ass and being expected to like it.
I mean that lie is so bad it's an insult to my intelligence. "It wasn't me (us)! It was her! It was her idea! She made me (us) do it!" I (we) didn't want to deceive people, I (we) just enjoyed the interaction of deceiving people. Even though it was my (his) fingers typing out the Tweets it was truly she who was the evil master mind behind the whole thing..."
Oh come on.
Just own up and close the account. Be responsible. You did wrong. Now stop doing it if you're so pure of heart, Mo.
And frankly a public apology is in order. AND the thread about thisisalmostit.com on this forum should have a disclaimer posted on it that it's a FAKE run by a friend of ADMIN's.
Otherwise, yes, as someone already stated, it is complete hypocrisy. Thisisalmosstit never deceived anyone or was intended for deception. On You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login I was debunked in one post, so you can also call that an insult to the inteligence of my "followers". I happen to know "someone" informed you almost two weeks ago ( you know who) about my twitter account so using the term "hypocrisy" coming from your mouth is very strange...... I and I alone am completely responsible for my own actions, but I keep on replying because I know that "someone" clearly is manipulating members and I hope some people finally understands who is feeding lies to cover their ass ..... The whole truth regarding thisisalmostit came out today, but it seems people here can't handle the truth........
20
« on: December 08, 2010, 02:01:46 PM »
@keyboardwizz, amateur interpretations and experimentations within a multicontextual approach are not showing the results of a real research at all and that is why "your" project got out of hand and looked lame from the beginning.
Game going out of hands? It never is or was a game for me, and if you've read my post above you'll read that I've used information based on knowledge I gathered the last 20 years, so calling that "amateur and experimentation " is clearly a lack of insight or interest. As I stated above T.S. only scratches the surface on multicontextual research, so if mine looked lame what would you call his ??
21
« on: December 08, 2010, 02:13:02 AM »
First of all, please use the quote button the right way, now it seems that Gema said:
"This whole experience is an example how a collective consciousness (the people aware of the hoax) create a new "reality " (Michael is alive)"
While this is my quote, and I made this statement as my personal view on the whole hoax, so it has nothing to do with the situation that's going on right now. And yes you can see my twitter experience as a social experience and it gave me a good insight in gullibility and interpretations of quotes and redirects.
Third, I was asked to stop but I had my own reasons for it to continue, when you read my posts on other threads you can clearly see my intentions and opinions, I don't wan't drama on this thread, thisisalmostit has been and will be a positive experience.
For synchronicity and multicontextual research you really have to do your own investigation, it involves a lot of reading,research and a totaly new way of looking at the world , but it's a very rewarding experience for me. It involves studying symbols, etymology, history, astrology, mystisicm, the occult, psychology etc. All of these are subjects I'm fascinated with for decades now, but with the multicontextual research all this knowledge finally fits together.
22
« on: December 07, 2010, 05:42:39 PM »
keyboardwizz, thank you for that info. Since I was one of those who didn't know it was you, could you tell us your honest opinion of TS/TIAI and do you believe Michael is alive? You mentioned that TS could just as easily as you get things from the internet. Are you saying he could be just another literal 'keyboardwizz'? Thanks.
Plus you're also calling yourself "The Source". TS :? "In my opinion everyone is responsible for what they are willing to believe" I have no idea who TS is, and what his intentions are, he has brought us some great insights and information but I noticed while tweeting myself that: short interpretations can be interpreted in a lot of different ways, so you can control the way people think, and another thing I noticed is that T.S. explained his redirects after the facts , and for me it's a bit suspicious that he makes predictions after the facts. If you a have a little knowledge of synchronicities and multicontextual research, you will notice that T.S. only scratches the surface, and my interests lie in a much broader field then this hoax alone, there are some things going on in this world that really blow my mind, so if Michael is alive or not is just a detail in my experience. Imho this whole experience is an example how a collective consciousness (the people aware of the hoax) create a new "reality " (Michael is alive) But I am glad that the truth about Michael (dead or alive ) is being told, the world has the right to know that it is/was being lied to by the media. For me personally the main thing in the hoax is how the f$ck can religious leaders get away with child abuse, while a pop idol still is being judged as a pedophile, while proven innocent, sadly it's a messed up world....... @ Gema : Nobody asked ..........
23
« on: December 07, 2010, 03:36:28 PM »
Most of you probably figured out by now that I am the person behind thisisalmostit and I feel I ow you all an explanation. -If you go back to the indexpage (the official twitter forum) it clearly states: Thisisalmostit by keyboardwizz -The first post on this thread was posted by me, that should set off an alarm, I posted the same post on You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login and one of the first replies I got was: "Since you posted this , it is probably you who started that account" so overthere I was debunked in a day...... -The information I used where little things I bumped in to during the last months, and where meant to make people think, (the same principle T.S. used) Those could be inspirational quotes, song lyrics or even little personal experiences, and because they came frome the same mind, they all seem connected. -Sometimes I even had some lucky tweets, so it seemed that I predicted events I also thought about the posibility to use my tweets and make it seem I "predicted "events, I 've hinted "controversy" months ago......... -I was amazed by the reactions and the amazing information I got back from some of you in this thread, and was intrigued by the way that some of my tweets where interpreted in a way that I never thought of I never ever had the intention to hurt or deceive any of you, in my opinion everyone is responsible for what they are willing to believe. I sincerly thank you for the information I've gotten back from you, I will continue posting on this account but now you know The Source.
24
« on: December 07, 2010, 11:04:11 AM »
Not by me Sarahli. Look at how keyboardwizz is supporting, who has operated the thisisalmostit twitter account with Mo's approval all this time. Talking about manipulation.
You "forgot" to mention, that it was you in the first place who got the idea of starting a twitter account to deceive the fans, we actualy talked you out of it (since it shouldn't be connected to mjdhi, so you both aproved the account for a long time. I started the account for sharing things I found interesting regarding the hoax, and actualy got a lot of interesting thrown back at me and it gave me a great insight in the way little fun facts are being interpreted...... The only thing I did on thisisalmostit was redericting to information that was allready available on the internet , (just like T.S. did) , so if I'm manupilating, what would you call what T.S. is doing ?
First of all let's make it clear that you chose to attack me on the forum for your own personal gain, because you have had a problem with me since day 1. Many times have you complained that I had more followers on Twitter, that people write Souza & Mo instead of Mo & Souza, you had a problem that TS didn't redirect to your posts enough, and every time he redirected to one of mine I felt uncomfortable because I knew you would have a problem with it again. All this time the problem was credits, credits for Mo, because if I posted something without putting your name underneath it, I had a problem and you would be cranky for days. Yet on the other hand many people also thanked you for certain things you never contributed to, and I never cared, because we were in this together. But after all the issues I told you we should split up and work alone, to avoid more issues. So that is what we did and you accused me after that for being on a solo-tour. Apparently you don't need me because you can think so well for yourself, so what do you need me for? I told you many times that this is not a game for me, and that it isn't about credits. It's not a rat race and there is no pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.
As for the person who helped us out, you are pissed because he hasn't been in contact since March, and that is the sole reason you are now attacking him and questioning his intentions.
Distance yourself from the theories Mo, I don't care, but to the members I would like to say the following about this person:
This person is someone I got in contact with in September 2009. This person mentioned very interested things and that is why I decided to contact HIM, not the other way around. This person never shoved anything up our throats. At first, before Mo joined the conversations, we just had nice talks, about things unrelated to the hoax. I started to ask questions about things and later on Mo joined and did the same. All he did was answer our questions and he never said we had to post certain things. He said many times "I don't tell you what to do, I only answer your questions". With every blog we wrote we verified things on the internet, with sources outside of TS/TIAI. All our blogs are sourced and never have we claimed that we had an informer, since everything we posted was from other sources, and not just merely a Q&A from an informer like we had with BoW. We always said they were theories, we never claimed it to be truth, and people have always been able to believe it or not. As for the V for Vendetta blog, that is not a theory at all, those are facts. This makes the blogs OUR theories and no one else's.
This person has always been very respectful about Mike and his family and gave us valuable information that helped us write our blogs. But never did he shove something down our throats. Every blog written is very well investigated and verified with sources on the internet. This person has always been nice to us and gave us advise how to protect our personal info and he always let us think for ourselves. The fact that you now reject the blogs is probably because I wrote most of it and read more about the issues discussed. Therefore I can still stand right behind the theories. You can distance yourself from them, but you can't debunk them either, same as you can't debunk TS and that is why you are desperately trying to manipulate the members now with your attacks towards TS and this person, let's call him 'Bob'. The fact that you can't wrap your mind around TS' post, the fact that you can't understand the math, doesn't mean the posts are BS. I am still waiting for answers to many of my questions in previous posts, but you can't seem to answer them.
'Bob', like TS, has ties with TMZ. Many times he has proven that to us with articles on TMZ that had things discussed between us in it, or even literal wording. 'Bob' hasn't contacted us since March because of a misunderstanding between him and myself, Mo wasn't even there and first attacked me for fucking it up. I had to let her read the discussion 10 times before she saw the misunderstanding. As lovely as 'Bob' often was, he could piss me off sometimes when he had a bad day. For months and months 'Bob' talked to us, answered questions and just entertained us with his extremely good sense of humor. Mo has been pissed from that moment on that he didn't talk to her either anymore after the fall/out he had with me and that kept an issue. As pissed as I was in the beginning about this misunderstanding and his assumption that was not true, I left it behind me. For months he had helped us out and I appreciated that, but I don´t need him to function.
If 'Bob' and TS are fooling people, TMZ and the family are doing the same. But in that case I think it should be very easy to debunk TS but until now, no one even came close. It´s easy to say `TS is fooling people but I can´t tell you why because I suck at math`. Ask someone else if you suck at math yourself. Same with the Elvis connection. I would like to see someone debunk that fact.
It is also not true that TS took over when 'Bob' left, TS was redirecting for months already and had posted up until update 3 already, so that is again manipulation of the facts. As for the bamsday we had in mind, that was just one sentence on the bottom in a 2-page theory we had back then about a connection with a picture from TII and a city in the US. Big chance he meant ´that´s it´ about the theory, since he told me before that alleged bamsday that that was not the date. That´s how facts can be twisted and things written on a screen misunderstood, just like the issue I had with ´Bob´ in March. The danger of the internet.
A clear example of twisting words (or misinterpretation), Mo isn't distancing herself from the theories , she is doubting the source and the way the info was brought to you both. "Bob" was giving hints and directions for your blogs, what resulted in some excelent blogs and became a valueable source of information, with some excellent investigation from you both. Second: Mo never stated she rejected the blogs, another thing you made up...... Even "Bob" gave you some inside information, what turned out to be information that was already available, so it isn't strange Mo is questioning "The Source"...... Here are a few questions again to you Mo, please answer them:
-If TS is a fraud, then Bob is as well, but also the family and TMZ. Please tell me why the family would support a post from TS by getting the Army of LOVE tweet on the bottom of the page again.
-Why would TMZ support TS and 'Bob'? TMZ is getting 2,466,367 pageviews a day, I bet thay can miss the annoying hoaxers with their annoying questions they are not allowed to answer anyway.
-What is suddenly not plausible about the theories on the blog? What made you change your mind? Who is telling you what? Or do you just want the forum members to support you so you can get rid of me? That way you will get all the credits huh? But I am not going to let that happen. These are some valid questions (and not for Mo only), and of course are things that need investigation, and no it isn't about credits or followers , truth and credibility are more important imho. And no, it isn't about the plausibility of the theory, only the way the information was directed and not "shuved through our throats"(your twisted words again)
Again you are attacking people, including me, based on a new theory and assumptions. Never have I seen TS or 'Bob', do the same. You lack common sense again. Still waiting for your coherent theory that shows .
There is no new theory, only new information, what clearly sets the hoax in a different view, and no, those are no assumptions but based on facts. The fact that you are trying to hold back certain information and twist words is highly questionable and the last few weeks it seems as you are the one that's afraid of losing followers and credits. Attackin and feeling attacked are two totally different things ........ As for banning members, I think I remember where you banned Gema once, without reason and I got the shit while I didn't even agree with it and unbanned her. Every single member I banned was a member that couldn't behave. I have disagreements with many people here on the board, yet they are still here, so don't accuse me of silencing people. Take a long look in the mirror Mo. Glad you brougt up the mirror, in most of your answers on this thread you are simply mirroring the attacks, a real easy way to distract from the truth.....
You keep attacking ME for manipulation here on the board, yet all you are doing is manipulating people yourself with your "OMG I'm so honest" posts. You have no answers to any of my questions and you haven't debunked a thing. You are showing your true colors Mo. You lack patience, trust and you are too obsessed with this, that is why you are pissed at everyone. 'Bob' couldn't answer everything, just like the family can't say it all yet, like TMZ still can't report it and TS can't reveal it all yet. Although the goal is big, he added some entertainment too and we have to accept that we can't know it all (yet). Next time when you attack people, including me, post your theory with it that proves your claims. As long as it is just another theory, refrain from your vicious attacks and manipulation towards other people. And stop complaining about me and twisting the facts towards the mods. This is all to get me off the board and it's not going to work. Who is silencing who here?
Nobody is wanting you off the board , you obviously feel attacked, because some forum "ïnsiders" know what is going on behind the curtain of this site, and those people (including me) want the whole truth out there and want to end the misinformation that is happening lately on this site.
25
« on: December 07, 2010, 03:59:58 AM »
After going through all the replies in this thread again I decided that the time has come to set the records straight about the things that set everything in motion, because again due to holding back information people are led to think into a certain direction.
The following has been known by a few other people for months, so there's no use of accusing me of making all of this up. Before making comments about 'integrity', ask yourself if integrity means keep holding back information to lead people to think into a desired direction.
The blogs "Debunking “Wacko Jacko” for once and for all!", "Mike; victim of Illuminati & Mind Control?", "The Grammys 2010: Caves are opened, sharp exits are made" and "V for Vendetta – V for Vengeance" were NOT initiated by Souza and me. Therefore, these theories are not OUR theories.
I had never heard of the illuminati, and Souza ridiculed the indea of the illuminati being involved with a hoax or murder plot right from the beginning. It wasn't until an anonymous person kept urging us to research MK Ultra and the illuminati that we started reading up on it, which resulted in the blog "Mike; victim of Illuminati & Mind Control?". The very same anonymous person "hinted" us about an obedience drug (fluoride), kept urging us about the importance of TIAI, and asked us to blog about the Grammys and the trial. When we had questions, this anonymous person answered them. He had his answers to many of the questions we had, but some things 'he could not tell us'. These blogs actually are HIS theories, not ours, we only wrote them based on the information the anonymous person gave us while he kept out of sight. The 'clues' in MJ's songs and speeches are HIS clues, not ours. Many of the statements we made over the past 12 months are actually HIS statements, not ours.
Although some predictions he did came true, in example the fall of MJHD last year in November, this anonymous person gave us key dates and predicted events, but these days went by unnoticed and these events never occurred. We had a theory of a bamsday of which he said: "That's it.", but that date also went by while nothing happened.
Certain inside information he gave us to reward us for our work I recently found out was already available on the internet before he gave it to us, even the insider photograph was already out there and discussed. Inside information turned out to be public information after all.
All the above info was 'given' to us in PM. The only big difference between this anonymous person and TIAI/TS is that the anonymous person repeatedly told us that he despises religion as according to him religion is a mind fuck and another way to brainwash and control people, while TIAI/TS keeps shoving bible quotes down our throats and encouraged us to go "door to door" with the Elvis/MJ issue. If the anonymous person we talked to in PM is one of MJ's informers and strongly objects to everything that has to do with religion, then there's a HUGE contradiction with the messages by TIAI/TS. If TIAI/TS is one of MJ's informers, then there's a HUGE contradiction with the "helper" we talked to in PM.
All this has never been made public, as well as investigation into certain clues that have never been made public as I was not permitted to post that clue research info because 'this could influence the believe of the hoaxers'.
I found out certain things which made me realize that there had been a clever use of our credulity, which resulted in us starting to 'unfold' the purpose of this hoax through our blogs, posts and videos. Our findings were 'confirmed' by TIAI/TS, and TIAI/TS and this anonymous person clearly are connected. After the anonymous person hightailed it in the beginning of March due to an argument in PM TS completely took over, taking things a step further with every post he made.
The above, and the persuading redirects to the MJ/Elvis issue caused me to start investigating everything again, but this time I kept in mind that we could have been fooled. During this research I time after time bumped into findings which in my opinion confirms this.
So, there is no "Souza and Mo theory" at all. All we have ever written in the above mentioned blogs was whispered into our ears and confirmed by anonymous persons. I'm sorry for being gullible and I apologize for bringing this out in the open so late, but unless ALL the information is given the members here have no idea what's going on.
The confirmation of the purpose of MJ's hoax people still hold on to is the Dangerous autograph, explained by TS in Update #4b. NO ONE knows if that explanation is the truth, it is the ONLY Dangerous autograph which is signed that way, and explained by TS who is yet another anonymous person. There's a Michael Jackson autograph with 1998 written next to it in the Victory tour book, long before the Bad album and Moonwalker and long before 06/25/2009.
Michael Jackson ONLY wore the number 777. The numbers 333, 666 and 999 he never wore or used. Everything that has to do with 333, 666 and 999 was brought in by TS. Yes, that explanation sounded logical, especially after the blogs we wrote, the videos we made, the TIAI redirects and the TS posts. But keep in mind that this was ALL information given by ANONYMOUS PERSONS, and NONE of us know what purpose these people have in mind.
I'm baffled to see continues vicious attacks on people appearing time after time, while everything regarding "the theory" is in fact based on what a few anonymous people, who clearly cooperated to get THEIR word out, whispered into our ears and about which we blogged. It's ironic how other people in this hoax were "finished off" because they wrote their theories based on what their "informers" told them, yet The Theory here is based on the very same thing. It's ALL assumptions, and it's time people start realizing this.
I really don't care who these anonymous persons are, even if they were Michael Jackson himself, his relatives or persons he "send to help". I'm sick and tired of the manipulation, the telling of half truths, the attacks and the attempts to silence people who do know what happened behind the scenes. We're here to find out the TRUTH, and the TRUTH won't be found by holding information back. If we want to fight the illuminati and NWO, half truths and manipulation will have to be banned from our own community first.
I will continue my research and publish the outcome of it, because this STILL is an investigation website. Unless EVERYTHING is investigated, there's no investigation at all.
Excellent post Mo, I can back this story up myself, since I was there when Mo & Souza discussed this matter. It s clear to me someone is trying to control the information we get. It has even gone so far that info is being witheld from this forum, it's time the trut is revealed.....
26
« on: December 03, 2010, 06:32:41 PM »
Reading this thread I actualy see some people do get the point, there are just some points that don't make sense, the dangling carrot is a well chosen image for the statement TS makes (about "happen to know something") , and imho is not disrespectfull. I remember times when those kind of statements set off a troll alert.......
No, I m not insuinating TS is a troll and nobody is calling TS a fraud , (this is the label you have given him).
Imho it's just healthy to ask questions, and not take all the given info for granted, I don't see anyone being hurt or being treated disrespectfull in this thread, but in other threads I see some personal attacks, and noone comments on those.
And yes sheep do eat carrots .......... (just my quirky sense of humour)
27
« on: December 03, 2010, 05:07:33 PM »
Do sheep eat carrots? :roll:
28
« on: November 27, 2010, 06:45:11 AM »
By ""evidence" I meant: . Do you think the Elvis Presley Estate would accept DNA on an envelop, sent in by mail? I don't think so... They would demand a swap being taken from Jesse by an expert, and they will probably demand that witnesses from the Estate be present when that happens. because I suspect this was the quote which triggered Eliza to ask to remove these posts, and triggered Mo to investigate the matter further. So why hold back this important information ?
29
« on: November 27, 2010, 05:42:39 AM »
So one simple question:
Can you please show us the post where we can read that the legal dna evidence isn't accepted in a court case? (Because you stated that this was known information.)
Until I read the chain of custody information I always thought Eliza had a solid case, but when that information got out it spread a different light on things, to make things worse Eliza asked to remove this evidence and any investigator would know someone did't want that certain information is being spread. So I was happy finally some solid evidence was brought up, instead of lame redirects which essentiality say:
"Just wait and see" :roll:
30
« on: November 26, 2010, 05:07:02 PM »
Oh really? I don't think that is entirely true, what about you? This "big fish" will keep quiet if this nonsense finally stops, like this "big fish" asked like a hundred times. I have nothing to be quiet about, for people who can read it's all clear, Imho on an investigation site it's important to stick with facts, whether it's about legalevidence that is being held back or about a photoshopped image. Truth will prevail
|
Show Posts