I agree with you 100%!
If they did auction off the needle than they have NO EVIDENCE!
This story is getting deeper and deeper DOWN THE RABBIT WHOLE! :shock:
THE END IS ALMOST HERE
Okay soo....
1. Why would Michael have $1million cash stashed in his house?? (unless he would need it sometime soon..)
2. Is the security reaaally that bad there that some randomer could just walk in.. kill mike and leave without murray, the kids or the chef seeing or hearing anything -afterall.. they were there right?
3. If this was a murder then the killer is the dumbest schmuck EVER for leaving the needle there with prints on it!!
4. Why the hell would the needle be auctioned off? The investigation isnt even closed the needle is like THE main piece of evidence
5. What kinda investigation dept doesnt check the needle for prints until 2 years later?! helloo? would this not be the first thing to do?
6. If its the same in the US as in the UK then all family members would have to have been arrested for their finger prints to be taken?? Pretty sure that never happened.
So... answer time..
1. Michael must have known he was gona be needing this money at some point right? So what for? And why couldnt he just whack it out the bank when he needed it? Maybe cause he knew this would look strange if a "DEAD" guy suddenly decides to empty his bank?
2. The cctv tapes go missing... soo.. we have a killer who is too stupid to burn the evidence but has the brains to take the tapes. Yeah. Realistic. OR.....