31
Coherent Theories ~ Connect the dots / Re: Sony is Behind the Hoax and MJ is Dead
« on: September 11, 2013, 08:37:32 PM »
I always ask me why record a rehearsal using HD and many cameras?, why not make that with the concerts?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 31
Coherent Theories ~ Connect the dots / Re: Sony is Behind the Hoax and MJ is Dead« on: September 11, 2013, 08:37:32 PM »
I always ask me why record a rehearsal using HD and many cameras?, why not make that with the concerts?
32
Michael / Re: Producer Teddy Riley says he was “set up”, apologises for involvement« on: September 05, 2013, 08:48:53 PM »
If this is true is something very serious, as be SONY in all this?
34
AEG ~ Sony / Re: Katherine Jackson versus AEG set for trial 9-10-2012« on: September 03, 2013, 08:44:30 PM »
AEG contract to this Dr. Earley, and gives a chronology of the addictions of Michael
Quote Throughout his testimony, Earley was shown a large timeline showing the various times MJ asked for or received propofol in non-med settings. Quote One of the instances noted was the time Jackson received propofol in a German hotel room in 1997 Quote The chart also included four times Jackson sought out propofol for sleep: in 98/99 from Dr. Christine Quinn, in 2002 from Dr. Van Valin ... [quoteand two instances in 2009 from nurse practitioner Cherilyn Lee and Dr. Allan Metzger][/quote] Quote Dr. Earley said Dr. William Van Valin II testified that in 2002, Jackson brought him a box of propofol and asked him to give it to him. Quote Earley said this was evidence that Jackson had the drug. Van Valin refused, saying propofol was dangerous, according to the slides 35
Dr. Conrad Murray / Re: back of murray's head« on: September 02, 2013, 08:10:52 PM »If Front, Back, SOTT are not MJ: +1 36
Michael Jackson News / Re: Important information for all members« on: September 02, 2013, 07:35:11 PM »Hey, if anyone wants to think MJ is dead because Front is a fake then so be it. I am not starting to convince people on that after 4+ years. That is the problem with trolls though, they make people doubt things that are so clear cut. The majority believe that MJ is alive before that these personages appear (TS and FRONT), all this shit makes me very angry,i do not understand to do this 37
MJDHI Announcements / Re: The focus of this forum, why are some topics not allowed?« on: September 01, 2013, 05:38:03 PM »
Well, I don't know who he is but with photoshop can do many things. And a good makeup also
38
MJDHI Announcements / Re: Forum down the last couple of days« on: September 01, 2013, 05:17:12 PM »
Also has Front forum, the truth I am not informed of anything, my position in all this is in another thread
39
TMZ Articles / Re: MICHAEL JACKSON ACCUSER I Can Help Victims Of Child Sex Abuse« on: August 21, 2013, 10:38:37 AM »
MJ was in 2007, we are going to say, alive now he wants to make money with all this
40
AEG ~ Sony / Re: Katherine Jackson versus AEG set for trial 9-10-2012« on: August 20, 2013, 08:54:39 PM »41
Prince, Paris & Blanket / Re: Sobbing Debbie Rowe recalls Paris Jackson's suicide attempt« on: August 20, 2013, 02:21:43 PM »This twitter fight was as low and disgusting as it gets. It's a crazy state of affairs when a hoaxer thinks they know more and have the right to publicly blast a person who was actually part of Michael's life and carried two of his children. :icon_e_confused: I agree in this, there are a few tweets of Pearl that are an insult in regard to the children 42
TMZ Articles / Re: RANDY JACKSON BITCHES ABOUT PARIS DEBBIE ROWE PISSED« on: August 20, 2013, 01:31:18 PM »
Always discussing for twitter
43
Other Odd Things / Re: No more TIAI.com?« on: August 20, 2013, 01:22:42 PM »
With TS all ended without conclusions and with more questions than answers
44
AEG ~ Sony / Re: Katherine Jackson versus AEG set for trial 9-10-2012« on: August 16, 2013, 02:55:08 PM »Bec, but isn't "a very good reason" the base of this whole hoax? This hoax is absolutely not for entertainment purposes only and i do believe that MJ wants to make us and the whole world realize some things (not a "personal crusade" but a much larger thing such as how the music industry treats the artists, Illuminati connexion etc etc as i'm pretty much certain that MJ's not pulling this hoax out only for some selfish purposes) that are usually ignored by the general public. Exposing "a very good reason" after bam is imo what will get the attention of people all around the world (with the exception of some people such as our grandparents lol) and what will have a massive effect on how MJ will be seen (his true genius will have to be recognized, even though, i agree with you, haters still gonna hate). Without that reason, bam, and the hoax are somehow pointless and if there is a come-back, then MJ might have some serious problems as people will feel betrayed (especially fans) even though everything in the hoax was legal. But if MJ has a "good reason" then not only will he get the people's attention (as i believe we (believers) won't be the only ones to care) but also revealing his magnificent hoax and its purposes he'll be able to explain his not 100% moral/legal proceedings (and don't get me wrong, I do not believe there are many of such things in this hoax but while he may be clean with the law, there will always be people claiming that this or that shouldn't have been done etc). If you want to expose someone, you just cannot be 100% nice to that person, especially when it is part of a larger operation (we were talking about the FBI involvement, stings etc)... If MJ has some important people on his side, i believe that nothing is impossible. While Murray's trial had fake written all over it, this one has always been a lot different to me, much more serious (maybe bcs we don't have live video coverage and can't see all the toys in the room lol). The fact that Katherine is directly involved bothers me a lot bcs somehow i do not believe that MJ would like his mum to be in court everyday and listen to horrible things being said about his son, whether he's dead or not, for hoax/entertainment purposes only... So imo he has to have some very good reasons to even let this trial begin. So i think that there has to be a real purpose for this trial (that may be half fake but not completely) and i have no real idea what this purpose is but i believe it will be part of the "very good reason" for this hoax and that it will be revealed after bam. Wrongful Death attitude negligent attitude neglect intentional attitude All of this supposedly do Murray 45
Other Odd Things / Re: Four years later, how do you feel?« on: August 13, 2013, 02:28:26 PM »I figured that was what you meant, Do. Ever since the TDCAU TII clip was released shortly after MJ "died", I've felt that the reasons and results for MJ's hoax go far beyond Michael himself. The 1:35 TDCAU TII clip was the only rehearsal footage available until the movie came out which was always very telling to me because there is a definite message there. So I do see what you're saying about the length of this hoax - the longer the return, the greater the significance for the reasons behind the hoax. Already that touched upon the topic of Paris, by way of information i public links should not be publish these topics in the forum. Read each of the links in the next article You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login |