This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - paula-c
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 488
31
« on: September 11, 2013, 08:37:32 PM »
I always ask me why record a rehearsal using HD and many cameras?, why not make that with the concerts?
32
« on: September 05, 2013, 08:48:53 PM »
If this is true is something very serious, as be SONY in all this?
33
« on: September 05, 2013, 08:22:24 PM »
HI EWAS!!!
![]()
Thanks for becoming a mod, you are great!
:thjajaja121:
I want a cat like that :icon_albino:
34
« on: September 03, 2013, 08:44:30 PM »
AEG contract to this Dr. Earley, and gives a chronology of the addictions of Michael Throughout his testimony, Earley was shown a large timeline showing the various times MJ asked for or received propofol in non-med settings. One of the instances noted was the time Jackson received propofol in a German hotel room in 1997 The chart also included four times Jackson sought out propofol for sleep: in 98/99 from Dr. Christine Quinn, in 2002 from Dr. Van Valin ... [quoteand two instances in 2009 from nurse practitioner Cherilyn Lee and Dr. Allan Metzger][/quote] Dr. Earley said Dr. William Van Valin II testified that in 2002, Jackson brought him a box of propofol and asked him to give it to him. Earley said this was evidence that Jackson had the drug. Van Valin refused, saying propofol was dangerous, according to the slides
35
« on: September 02, 2013, 08:10:52 PM »
If Front, Back, SOTT are not MJ:
Then LKL trickster is not MJ.
Then MJ is not anyone online.
Then MJ is not alive, most likely.
Then the whole hoax we've been studying here is orchestrated by an evil power such as TPTB to deceive us with Front/Back/SOTT/LKL guy/TS, etc. as their right hand man, in collusion with MJ's family.
I refuse to believe the above though, only that MJ is covering his tracks, again. JMO though.
Until I see verified proof, I will stay the course. If he is proven dead, then that will be it for me, though the adventure has been agonizing fun.
I feel the same :icon_e_sad:
Ps: I don't understand this thread, is it about if CM is Michael?? then my answer is "NO".
+1
36
« on: September 02, 2013, 07:35:11 PM »
Hey, if anyone wants to think MJ is dead because Front is a fake then so be it. I am not starting to convince people on that after 4+ years. That is the problem with trolls though, they make people doubt things that are so clear cut.
MJ is alive, if I am wrong then I will eat cow shit for a year.
The majority believe that MJ is alive before that these personages appear (TS and FRONT), all this shit makes me very angry,i do not understand to do this
37
« on: September 01, 2013, 05:38:03 PM »
Well, I don't know who he is but with photoshop can do many things. And a good makeup also
38
« on: September 01, 2013, 05:17:12 PM »
Also has Front forum, the truth I am not informed of anything, my position in all this is in another thread
39
« on: August 21, 2013, 10:38:37 AM »
MJ was in 2007, we are going to say, alive now he wants to make money with all this
40
« on: August 20, 2013, 08:54:39 PM »
Dr. Patrick Treacy @peege 12 ago Despite what Randy Jackson said in the trial, I never saw MJ with any drugs in his life. Trust me, I knew his #inner You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAAr0NKkVSI[/youtube]
41
« on: August 20, 2013, 02:21:43 PM »
This twitter fight was as low and disgusting as it gets. It's a crazy state of affairs when a hoaxer thinks they know more and have the right to publicly blast a person who was actually part of Michael's life and carried two of his children. :icon_e_confused:
This is wrong on so many levels. Just horrible.
I agree in this, there are a few tweets of Pearl that are an insult in regard to the children
42
« on: August 20, 2013, 01:31:18 PM »
Always discussing for twitter
43
« on: August 20, 2013, 01:22:42 PM »
With TS all ended without conclusions and with more questions than answers
44
« on: August 16, 2013, 02:55:08 PM »
Bec, but isn't "a very good reason" the base of this whole hoax? This hoax is absolutely not for entertainment purposes only and i do believe that MJ wants to make us and the whole world realize some things (not a "personal crusade" but a much larger thing such as how the music industry treats the artists, Illuminati connexion etc etc as i'm pretty much certain that MJ's not pulling this hoax out only for some selfish purposes) that are usually ignored by the general public. Exposing "a very good reason" after bam is imo what will get the attention of people all around the world (with the exception of some people such as our grandparents lol) and what will have a massive effect on how MJ will be seen (his true genius will have to be recognized, even though, i agree with you, haters still gonna hate). Without that reason, bam, and the hoax are somehow pointless and if there is a come-back, then MJ might have some serious problems as people will feel betrayed (especially fans) even though everything in the hoax was legal. But if MJ has a "good reason" then not only will he get the people's attention (as i believe we (believers) won't be the only ones to care) but also revealing his magnificent hoax and its purposes he'll be able to explain his not 100% moral/legal proceedings (and don't get me wrong, I do not believe there are many of such things in this hoax but while he may be clean with the law, there will always be people claiming that this or that shouldn't have been done etc). If you want to expose someone, you just cannot be 100% nice to that person, especially when it is part of a larger operation (we were talking about the FBI involvement, stings etc)... If MJ has some important people on his side, i believe that nothing is impossible. While Murray's trial had fake written all over it, this one has always been a lot different to me, much more serious (maybe bcs we don't have live video coverage and can't see all the toys in the room lol). The fact that Katherine is directly involved bothers me a lot bcs somehow i do not believe that MJ would like his mum to be in court everyday and listen to horrible things being said about his son, whether he's dead or not, for hoax/entertainment purposes only... So imo he has to have some very good reasons to even let this trial begin. So i think that there has to be a real purpose for this trial (that may be half fake but not completely) and i have no real idea what this purpose is but i believe it will be part of the "very good reason" for this hoax and that it will be revealed after bam.
That being said, I have no real clue what's going on so i just wait... :smiley-vault-misc-150: :LolLolLolLol:
Wrongful Death attitude negligent attitude neglect intentional attitude All of this supposedly do Murray
45
« on: August 13, 2013, 02:28:26 PM »
I figured that was what you meant, Do. Ever since the TDCAU TII clip was released shortly after MJ "died", I've felt that the reasons and results for MJ's hoax go far beyond Michael himself. The 1:35 TDCAU TII clip was the only rehearsal footage available until the movie came out which was always very telling to me because there is a definite message there. So I do see what you're saying about the length of this hoax - the longer the return, the greater the significance for the reasons behind the hoax.
Thanks Andrea for your nice response! However, I must admit that I'm starting to have doubts about the whole hoax...Yes ofcourse I know about all the clues and contradictions and that there are lots and lots of things that point to a hoax. I absolutely don't deny that, nor do I deny all the hours and hard work many members have put in this investigation. I've been there too, being all ecstatic and telling friends about it (who thought I was crazy). But when it was at first mainly the family that convinced me through their behaviour and statements he was still alive, now it is mainly the family who make me doubt about that.
If Michael is hoaxing his death, sure the family must say in interviews and on twitter that indeed, he is dead. But why writing books about his death (at least by Jermaine, Katherine and La Toya) and make a profit of a lie about the 'death' of their son/brother, which I really feel is morally incorrect. Why the latest trial, why the Paris suicide attempt, just why?? They should have stayed in the shadows, keeping low profile. I have real problems with this, it is, IMO, too serious to consider this as 'clues', fake trials etc. If the trial is fake and just for the hoax, what sense does it make? If the trial is real, then the family is after money instead of justice for their son, brother, father. See, when I really think about it, then many clues do have a 'con'. We explained them as clues, but it turned out to be nothing. And if they aren't clues, is it real then? I don't think Paris would attempt suicide (confirmed by the family, so no BS story), if she was safe and cosy with her dad....what kind of clue would it be otherwise, to bring attention to suicide attempts by kids? I personally don't buy that story, there are other ways to bring this problem to people's attention. So, if it was real, then why did she do it?
Andrea, I don't get it straight out what I'm feeling right now, but it's just not adding up to me anymore. I can't keep track of the story line anymore...
I know how strong of a believer you are, so was I, and I don't want to bore you with this, I only hope I'm wrong and this is gonna end soon, but I'm afraid this hoax will have an open 'ending'....we end up like the Elvis-hoaxers... :smiley-vault-misc-150:
Already that touched upon the topic of Paris, by way of information i public links should not be publish these topics in the forum. Read each of the links in the next article You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 488
|
Show Posts
