Quote from: "Ninanina"Quote from: "2good2btrue"That's, what I first saw, too... See how "bad" our minds work!Hey guys. I've saved the picture and zoomed in on everything, and it's fake. She could have placed the ONLY tribute of MJ there herself, and notice how it's right at the front.
LOOK CLOSELY AT THE PICTURES PLACED ON THE GROUND NEAR THE TOMB. TWO OF THE PICTURES ARE OF AN OLDER MAN, AND ONLY ONE RESEMBLES AN AFRICAN YOUNG BOY at the back. ALL THE FLOWERS HAVE A WHITE CARD, WITH NOTHING WRITTEN ON THEM. LOOKS LIKE THEY HAVE BEEN TURNED AROUND TO THE BLANK SIDE ON PURPOSE. ALSO, WHAT I FIND EVEN MORE BIZZARE, IS THE MOULD ON THE RIGHT TOMBSTONE. IT IS OF A MAN WITH BREASTS, AND A YOUNG CHILD VERY CLOSE TO HIS OR HER PRIVATE PARTS. THIS ABSOLUTELY WOULD NOT BE WHAT THE FAMILY WOULD HAVE CHOSEN, CONSIDERING WHAT MJ WENT THROUGH WITH THE TRIAL AND ALL. WHY NOT PICK AN ENBLEM OF A MAN SURROUNDED WITH MANY CHILDREN, LIKE PETER PAN. THIS IS A BIT FREAKY AND DISTASTEFUL. THERE'S A PICTURE OF AN OLD MAN AT THE BACK (COULD BE HIS DAD'S PHOTO) BUT THINK ABOUT IT. WHY THE HELL WOULD THEY PUT A PHOTO OF JOE JACKSON WITH MJ??????No way. This cries out so fake. Whoever took the photo was obviously at another grave site of another family, and have just placed the MJ wreath with some sort of stuffed toy in a box,to fool us........
Looking very close, it looks to me like an Angel with folded wings, holding a child's hand. And the "breasts" could be part of an armour.
But all those blurry images drive me mad!
If this is his grave, it's so weird not to engrave his name!Here's another shoot of the tomb , where both reliefs are visible.
When zoomed in, the picture on the left, although blurry, looks like Michael.
