This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - mjthelegendlives
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 32
16
« on: February 16, 2011, 09:35:22 AM »
Um..it would be a little difficult to hear or feel a dime hitting a boot..at the Grammys. Unless you're looking at the floor? I think theres something more to this dime story.
A Michael Jackson connection - If Billy was trying to reach out to Michael, maybe he was trying to ask Michael for help, especially since he says the handlers are putting Miley in danger. I don't want to sound rude, but why didn't he take care of his daughter way before?
What show was he trying to invite MJ to?
17
« on: February 12, 2011, 11:50:23 AM »
I had never seen this pic before. His eyes, smile, and just everything looks beautiful. Dont ya think? ![]()
18
« on: February 10, 2011, 08:50:01 PM »
Sorry guys I don't see anything. Maybe someone should circle it. I see I am not the only one. I must be blind.. lol Exactly. I am not saying its not there, its just that I cant see it.
19
« on: February 10, 2011, 08:30:03 PM »
I am overworked and cant see another face but the one the paramedics are "working" on. Can someone point it out to me, please?. Thanks
20
« on: February 05, 2011, 12:00:44 AM »
I wonder whats the deal with all the toys in the courtroom...lol at the hungry hippo game
21
« on: January 25, 2011, 10:18:42 PM »
The title sounds like it was Dr. Murray's dead body found in the courthouse :shock: ...got scared for a sec there. I wonder why there isnt a clear photo of that pic. Looks more like a garbage bag to me, and not a covered dead body. Maybe the whole trial is garbage :?:
22
« on: January 17, 2011, 11:14:04 PM »
Well, it wouldnt be the first case in the States where the victim shows up at his murderer's trial :lol: This is interesting...
Alleged Murder of Connie Franklin The alleged murder of Connie Franklin in 1929 scandalized the state and served to reinforce negative stereotypes about Arkansas in the national mass media. The uproar surrounding the apparent murder only increased with the reappearance of the “victim,” alive and well, shortly before the trial of his accused murderers. In January 1929, Connie Franklin wandered into the community of St. James (Stone County), where he found work cutting timber and as a farm hand. He claimed to be twenty-two years old, rather than his actual age of thirty-two. He reportedly courted the town’s girls, particularly sixteen-year-old Tillar (or Tiller) Ruminer. According to later testimony by Ruminer, on March 9, 1929, she and Franklin were going to Justice of the Peace Finis Ford’s office to obtain a marriage license. The two were attacked by a gang of men, identified by Ruminer as Hubert Hester, Herman Greenway, Joe White, and Bill C. “Straight Eye” Younger. Hester and Greenway were alleged to have taken Ruminer into the woods and raped her, while Franklin was reportedly tortured, mutilated, and murdered. A spring 1929 grand jury did not grant an indictment due to the fact that there was no body and no evidence that a crime had occurred other than hearsay from Bertha Burns, who, according to her own account, found the bloody hat belonging to Franklin and subsequently went to Ruminer, demanding to know what had happened and convincing her to report the attack to the authorities. Burns had recently secured a guilty verdict in May 1929 against Alex Fulks, Baxter Canard, and Ross Younger for the flogging she and her husband, Haywood, had suffered at the hands of the three men the previous year. The sheriff thought he had evidence to continue the investigation into the attack, probing neighbors around the areas of Dry Creek and Cajun Creek over the next several months. Ten days prior to the convening of the fall grand jury, in November 1929, Burns led the sheriff and some deputies to a place in the woods where they found an assortment of charred bones in a pile of ashes. The bones were sent to the state crime lab, and the grand jury, with this new evidence, issued five indictments, adding Alex Fulks to the list, as he was widely considered the ringleader of the group. The five men were soon arrested and held in separate jails for their own protection. Brothers Hugh Williamson, the prosecuting attorney, and Ben Williamson, the defense attorney, were pitted against each other in front of Judge Marcus Bone, with the trial set for December 16, 1929. (Complicating matters, the Williamson brothers both worked in the firm of their father, president of the Arkansas Bar Association.) As the attorneys prepared their cases, the accused men held to their stories that they had not seen Franklin on said date and that Franklin had left the community just as he had come in. Deputy O. L. Massey from Morrilton (Conway County) was provided information on December 3, 1929, from Elmer Wingo that Franklin had spent the night at the Wingo home after the alleged murder. Many newspapers—including the Arkansas Gazette, the Arkansas Democrat, and the Commercial Appeal of Memphis—ran this information along with a photo of Franklin. On December 7, 1929, Franklin was found by F. K. Marks, a cotton buyer, working on the farm of Murray Bryant near Humphrey (Arkansas County), who convinced Franklin to come to Mountain View (Stone County). Prosecutor Hugh Williamson warned that “somebody had lied and somebody was going to jail,” stating that there would be a sweeping inquiry into the matter once Franklin’s identity was confirmed. It became known that the man claiming to be Franklin had been drafted into the military in 1926, serving five days before entering the Arkansas State Hospital, from which he escaped in February 1927. He was married and had at least three children, which he had abandoned. Judge Bone went ahead with the trial while the November grand jury heard evidence to establish the true identify of the man who claimed to be Franklin. During the trial, Ruminer admitted that she had not seen anyone killed or burned, only beaten unconscious. The identify of Franklin was established by a number of persons who knew him before and after the alleged date of the murder and on a comparison of handwriting, fingerprints, and dental and medical records from the Arkansas State Hospital. However, Ruminer continued to deny that the man in the courtroom was the same man she had known before March 9. The jury deadlocked and the defendants were found not guilty. Some sources explain the alleged murder case as a revenge plot by Burns against Fulks and the others, who were the self-appointed moral enforcers of the rural area. Time magazine covered the trial, as did newspapers throughout the nation. The little town of Mountain View was inundated with reporters, spectators, and gawkers by the thousands, creating a circus-like atmosphere during the week leading up to the trial and during the trial itself. Heavy rains made the roads almost impassable. On December 11, 1929, Governor Harvey Parnell issued a public denouncement of the “yellow” journalism being practiced that branded the people of northern Arkansas as peons and idiots. The cost of the trial was more than $8,000, breaking the already financially burdened county. It was rumored that Judge Bone, upon the not-guilty finding of the jury, ordered that all records of the trial, other than those required by the court, be destroyed so as to end the chain of gossip. However, the story lives on in local folklore. You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
23
« on: January 14, 2011, 08:15:50 PM »
They had to identify the dead body, not the person they were trying to save, whoever that was. If the person dies unexpectedly , then he/she is taken to the coroners office and has to be identified; they have to know who this person is. They did this by using a driver's license. Driver's license are usually updated every 4 to 6 years. We don't know if MJ's DL was up-to-date, well at least I dont know. IMO, and with all the theories floating around, the best move would have been a DNA test...
24
« on: January 01, 2011, 01:05:17 AM »
2Bad and Jam I listened to today but I swear these aren't what I'm reminded of when I hear this.
There's something else and it's like right on the tip of my brain, you know? Toward the end of "We've had enough". I think that's where I've heard it, bec. Approximately 4:38-39 [youtube:zzlmlmsn]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R53Ubm4txus[/youtube:zzlmlmsn]
25
« on: December 15, 2010, 09:43:10 PM »
Christmas sells...especially a posthumous Michael Jackson album...I don't think it has anything to do with numbers, but those of cash...Just my opinion.
26
« on: December 15, 2010, 08:57:02 PM »
I would just like to point out that Taryll, who's been among the first ones questioning the authenticity of the songs on "Michael" has explicitly said that Hollywood Tonight IS MJ. He also said three tracks outta the ten are not MJ. Why didn't he say which ones are not MJ then? He's just stirring up the pot, IMO.
If you say HT is MJ, then Monster and BN must be as well. If you say Monster and BN is not MJ, then I say neither is HT. Because they sound the same to me, voice-wise. So where is the truth?
If Taryll wants to defend Michael's legacy (which is what he's been claiming all along), then why doesnt he step up and say: these songs are not MJ. It is this guy and this guy and Teddy is a liar and MJ is not alive. But no...he chose to be mysterious instead. I'm saying HE'S LOVING CONTROVERSY game. Agreed, I hear the same voices in "Hollywood Tonight" and "Monster".
27
« on: December 14, 2010, 08:57:16 PM »
More posts from Jason Malachi from that forum: from 2008
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
^^I've been trying to imitate those gorgeous harmonies since I was 13. I may come close at times, but no one does it like Michael Jackson.  k:
......Malachi
I May be doing something with MJ in the future. At the moment, it's kind of up in the air, but I'll keep you posted.
Thanks for the support.....Malachi
Jason Malachi just might be opening up for MJ during his tour at the O2 arena in London.....will keep you posted.
Best Wishes......Malachi
Leaks are a mixed blessing. They generate a buzz, but it happens when you least expect it and it's hard to locate the source who leaked it.
For example, "Mamacita" was not intended to be leaked. But someone leaked it and it generated a lot of publicity, and people thought it was a new Michael Jackson song, and it wasn't.
It just goes to show that you can't trust anyone in the record buisness, really. However, this song was most likely leaked on purpose
Love..........Malachi
Mike has been working hard the last few years. Trust me. This is only the beginning.........
Best Wishes......Malachi
Michael has such a unique voice. I actually always sounded like Michael, even when I was younger, I sounded like him when he was in the Jackson 5. Ironically, even after my voice broke and changed, I suddenly sounded like the adult Michael Jackson!!
Michael Jackson's voice (and overall style) has influenced legions of fans.
Love...........Malachi
I can't come forward with anything yet, but I will when I'm allowed to and things will make a lot of sense
Love................Malachi
I'm not allowed to reveal the details yet, but I have met Michael. :thud:
Patience is a Virtue, Guys. You All Will Be Rewarded In A Way You Couldn't Possibly Imagine:wink:
Love........Malachi
I was always that one guy who was allegedly "obsessed" with Michael Jackson. All through middle and high school, I sang and danced like him. I studied every gesture, every dance move, every vocal, every grunt...hell, even every "Hee-Hee." I caught a lot of flack for it, but I didn't care. I'm 28 years old now, and let's just say that Michael Jackson is still a HUGE part of my life. These comments are very interesting. Malachi met Michael, and seems like a real MJ fan. He had plans to work with him, according to these comments . How is it then, that he would allow Sony to credit his vocals to MJ? Do you think he would do this to MJ? Plus, by doing this all he is gaining is a greater hate from MJ fans who already thought he was imitating Michael. He would never be able to sell an album under his name. I want to think otherwise, but if these comments are real, then this Malachi dude is MJ. His adult voice changed just like Michael's adult voice? Shamone now, that's just too much.
28
« on: December 13, 2010, 07:18:12 PM »
Wasn't that what Abraham told to his wife Sarah? Sorry if I'm mixing the names. ( I have no idea what you're referring to, though. :lol: )
29
« on: December 13, 2010, 06:46:38 PM »
LOL Brilliant Though I'm not completely sure it isn't MJ singing Breaking News, I gotta admit this is one hell of a way to protest and I respect that.
30
« on: December 13, 2010, 06:35:16 PM »
Latoya likes to give her mom some lip? "Dont give me lip" is an expression I've heard meaning "dont argue". So Latoya likes to argue with her mom? :?:
|
Show Posts
