This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Tarja
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 43
16
« on: January 13, 2011, 03:07:59 PM »
News papers, magazines always use to retouch photos. Some want to retouch, some not. It's a damn usual thing. I work with photo edition. I don't get what's so strange in all this. The second has been lighted up and contrast increased, also lowered the saturation (in the original on the 1st page, because on this one I darkened it and increased saturation), but these are 2 different photos of the same moment taken at a few seconds distance
17
« on: January 13, 2011, 02:57:47 PM »
it's not the lighting, it's taken for sure at a few seconds difference and that's why it is different. They might have taken sequences and to be sure they have from what to choose when they publish it. There's no fake and no original. They are two photos. Look at mouth - different eyebrows in the 1st are closer to the eyes - normal reaction when one gets annoyed Eyes expression that can change in a few seconds. This is a sequence of photos, nothing strange about it. It's normal when you take photos. You can take a sequence of 6, 8, 16 photos, which are shot a 1 or 2 seconds difference You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
18
« on: January 13, 2011, 07:03:17 AM »
WHO will believe this piece of garbage?! I hate tabloids, I absolutelly HATE them
19
« on: January 12, 2011, 04:15:30 AM »
the WORST thing that's happening since more than an year is that who thinks he's right awfully NEGLECTS anything, absolutelly anything, just because they don't see anything else, they keep stubborn on their theories without regarding any other possibility. The AR wasn't a proof, the trial isn't a proof, the funeral wasn't a proof, the memorial either. Then what would you consider a proof? Sorry, just curious. Maybe someone will get out of this mass-opinion and regard every possibility, not just one. No, I won't answer at any kind of reply "if you hink he's dead, get out of here", just because I am not sure of anything at this moment. I can't be sure, I don't have how, but at least I discuss every single possibility, I am opened at everything. I am not holding the "I don't believe/it isn't any proof" sign without thinking what I'm saying.Without actually realising what I'm saying.
20
« on: January 12, 2011, 01:12:51 AM »
Having... fun? Sorry but not everyone is having fun. I am simply not having fun. I want all this to end, I want the truth!
21
« on: January 11, 2011, 05:51:50 PM »
does anyone find this a good sign? 'cause I don't
22
« on: January 11, 2011, 05:50:49 PM »
I can't believe he goes on trial..
23
« on: January 11, 2011, 01:09:23 PM »
Gina, you won't put a person to sleep longer if you overdose him. At least it's what I think. I said, from my knowlegde, continuosly injecting - as in transfusion- don't know how to explain it. You take, for example, 1 ml of propofol and you inject that 1 ml constantly at each 2-3 minutes and keep that person under sleep the time you need. I don't know how right I am, I just explain what my logic tells me. I am not a doctor and either I know how these things function. I take them with my general knowlegde
24
« on: January 11, 2011, 12:56:11 PM »
from my knowledge propofol is an anestethic that is used continuosly during a surgery. The patient is put under constant injection of the anestethic during the surgery because it gets out of blood very quick,in a few minutes, and if it's not constantly injected the patient would wake up.
I don't know what to think about this
25
« on: January 11, 2011, 01:39:16 AM »
did anyone listen to TMZ live on last night?
26
« on: January 11, 2011, 12:34:13 AM »
Marlon had a twin who died at birth, and his name was Brandon. Not Michael. But if believing this makes you feel better, it's your right. I just told you the reality, as reality lately is very well left aside
27
« on: January 10, 2011, 02:50:42 PM »
Besides this photo with the cigg not lit, can you post here the rest of the photos of Michael with a cigg in his hand? In my whole life I've never came across such photos (and it's a lifetime since I love him) besides this one where he's actually not smoking. No one knows if he smoked or if he's smoking now and it's irritating to see stories made around the issue. In my opinion he didn and he's not smoking.
28
« on: January 10, 2011, 02:33:50 PM »
I have my questions upon TR since a certain point in time and he's not something I rely on. I am SICK of people playing games, lying all the time, all the time! But I have to highlight the fact that this Mel seems nothing and absolutelly nothing but someone who desperately wants attention
29
« on: January 10, 2011, 02:31:49 PM »
Michael has no twin and never had.
30
« on: January 10, 2011, 02:29:39 PM »
what happens to all of you?? I mean, excuse me, but why are you all interested in that chat? Is he/she some sort of important people? No, he/she is just someone who WANTS to look like one and it's lame at this point in time.
|
Show Posts