This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - MsTrinity333
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 24
31
« on: February 10, 2012, 11:24:29 AM »
Hi Front...I mean Back...I mean Michael! /toldya/ lolol/
L.O.V.E. the poem.
32
« on: February 05, 2012, 05:43:28 PM »
On that note, I agree 100% bindupbrokenhearted, Sabbath isn't NEEDED for salvation. That is what Ron's claim is; which goes against Jesus who stated: it is not the works of man but the faith and love that gives us righteousness and salvation. There is zero Biblical support of the grand claim that the Old Ark of the Covenant will resurface and be crucial to our salvation. Also, there is zero support of any of Ron's claims regarding the blood belonging to Jesus for if there was, every Christian would gladly welcome his findings. If in fact there is, than by all means: please share along with the Biblical evidence.
First of all I wish to thank everyone who sent me messages for their prayers, blessings & condolences. I'm still trying to catch up; so far I'm only on pg 13. bearhug On the note about the Sabbath I just wanted to share: New International Version (©1984) Then he said to them, "The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. New Living Translation (©2007) Then Jesus said to them, "The Sabbath was made to meet the needs of people, and not people to meet the requirements of the Sabbath. English Standard Version (©2001) And he said to them, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. New American Standard Bible (©1995) Jesus said to them, "The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath. King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.) And he said unto them, The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath:[/color]
33
« on: February 04, 2012, 07:08:21 PM »
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
This is a link to a message by Chuck Missler titled The 7th Day. It is very detailed and thorough It is also a couple of hours long.
He says that anyone who thinks this is a simple argument hasn't really studied it. The idea of the sabbath was established in Eden when God rested from His work. It predates the Mosiac law, as in it God says to" remember" the sabbath and to keep it holy. In Jesus' day keeping the sabbath had become largely external and formal. Jesus shows in Mark 2: 23-27 the true concept of what the sabbath was instituted for. It was made for man.
I was surprised to here Chuck say that he and his wife observe from Friday eve to Saturday evening as a time they decided to set apart. A decision they both came to after digging through the word of God.
He promises that there will be something in this to offend both sides of the debate.
I LOVE Chuck Missler! That man is a fantastic teacher. /bravo/
34
« on: February 04, 2012, 07:04:53 PM »
@ Bindupbrokenheart: Your posts were excellent. /bravo/
Ron Wyatt is very controversial among the mainstream of Christianity. There's some good and some bad so everyone please take him with a grain of salt, and don't be deceived.
I posted this earlier on the other site so will copy it here:
Just wanted to check in and let you know TS I saw the redirect. :
My father passed away 1-16-2012 so I have been busy elsewhere making arrangements and will get back to studying & re-reading your post later. Right now I have a lot to handle.
I love you TS; you know that. That will never change, but I think you already know on this we will just need to agree to disagree on the Michael the Archangel / Jesus thing. I understand where you are coming from, and why you would believe that with the whole Angel of the Lord thing which confuses a lot of people, but I believe as does most mainstream Christianity that the Bible supports & identifies them as two separate entities.
I wish you well and will be back later. 
Love to all
bearhug
PS:
I Just watched this today after my original post. I think it's relevant... WOW.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eucVQtdvQQ[/youtube]
bearhug
MsTrinity, I am praying for you. I am sorry about your father's passing. May God keep you and bless you during this time.
To everyone: I have some serious personal things (not directly related to the forum) going on so I might not be on the forums much. I apologize if I was previously on edge (I didn't realize how these things were affecting me) and I apologize to anyone if anyone was hurt (I don't mean to hurt anyone). But...God is so Good...No matter how I was acting, God may have offered a breakthrough for something I have been praying for for a long, looong time, so pray for me and those God knows are involved with this.
Yeah, Jesus! Luke 4:18
God bless you all here: Numbers 6:24
The Lord bless you, and keep you;
The Lord make His face shine on you,
And be gracious to you;
The Lord lift up His countenance upon you,
And give you peace
Sorry if this is off topic, back to topic. I absolutely agree with MsTrinity about the Archangel Michael not being Jesus and about how to take info on the AoC.
I do love you all; hopefully I will be back soon.
And God's blessing on you too. bearhug
35
« on: January 25, 2012, 06:18:19 PM »
@ Bindupbrokenheart: Your posts were excellent. /bravo/
Ron Wyatt is very controversial among the mainstream of Christianity. There's some good and some bad so everyone please take him with a grain of salt, and don't be deceived.
I posted this earlier on the other site so will copy it here:
Just wanted to check in and let you know TS I saw the redirect. :
My father passed away 1-16-2012 so I have been busy elsewhere making arrangements and will get back to studying & re-reading your post later. Right now I have a lot to handle.
I love you TS; you know that. That will never change, but I think you already know on this we will just need to agree to disagree on the Michael the Archangel / Jesus thing. I understand where you are coming from, and why you would believe that with the whole Angel of the Lord thing which confuses a lot of people, but I believe as does most mainstream Christianity that the Bible supports & identifies them as two separate entities.
I wish you well and will be back later.
Love to all bearhug
PS:
I Just watched this today after my original post. I think it's relevant... WOW.[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eucVQtdvQQ[/youtube]
36
« on: January 11, 2012, 04:22:51 PM »
Congratulations Souza! Excellent Blog. /bravo/ /bravo/ /bravo/
I read it on my smart phone via Massimo's post on FB, and decided I just had to take time out of putting Christmas stuff away to come downstairs, turn on the computer and say Well Done and welcome to the Family. bearhug
I'm so glad you posted it & TS redirected to it. I was a little concerned when you received complaints about all the religious talk, and spun off a sister site. I wasn't sure which direction the forum was taking. But it's my belief we can't separate the Man from his Faith anymore than we can separate the man from the hoax. Thank you. /woohoo/
37
« on: January 09, 2012, 02:43:28 PM »
Excellent posts BeTheChange... (and others)
It's called faith for a reason. So the question we have to ask ourselves is; are we going to follow Moses/Michael/TS/Front/Back or not? If you want to go back to Egypt then go, but we've gone through the wilderness the last 3yrs. (a lot of us bitching & moaning just like the Israelites) I don't know about you but I'm ready to 'cross' over to the Promised land. /woohoo/
L.O.V.E. to all,
bearhug
38
« on: January 09, 2012, 12:15:42 PM »
I believe it will show up again during the rebuilding of the coming third temple in the last days... Grant Jeffrey's has stated in the videos I posted from GODTV earlier that they do have it; it's been brought back from Ethiopia. But after the 1000 yr millennium when everything is finished there will be no more need for the Ark; that's what I believe they are referring to when they say it will no longer come to mind.
39
« on: January 06, 2012, 12:57:19 PM »
On that note:
With that in mind, let's for a moment consider how the Roman crucifixion procedure was carried out when used for capital punishment. The term "crucifixion" is based on the Latin word crux, which means cross. In English versions of the Bible, we read that Jesus was crucified on a cross (stauros in Greek).
Stauros refers to a wooden pole or timber with or without a crosspiece. Acts 5:30 and 10:39 and 1 Peter 2:24 tell us that Jesus was put to death on a tree (xulon in Greek). The reason this word was used in a few places is because the authors were making a point to the Jews. Traditionally, the Jews viewed an individual who was hung on a tree as one who was under God’s curse (Galatians 3:13, quoting Deuteronomy 21:23). But the authors of Acts and Peter, when they used xulon did not mean Jesus was crucified on a living tree. He was crucified on some kind of apparatus fashioned from the timber of a tree.
Though information is limited, historical and archaeological evidence shows that the Romans generally used a crossbar, not a vertical post alone, when crucifying individuals. This crossbar either sat on top of the vertical post or traversed it somewhere along its upper quadrant. The beam that Jesus was made to carry (John 19:17), and that Simon from Cyrene carried for him after Jesus collapsed in exhaustion (Luke 23:26), was most likely the crosspiece that was later affixed to an upright pole that was already in place.
There is no indication in the Gospels that Jesus’ crucifixion was in any way different from the normal Roman crucifixion. The Evangelical Dictionary of Theology states: "It seems that the Gospel accounts of the death of Jesus describe a standard Roman procedure for crucifixion" (page 287). We may conclude with a reasonable degree of assurance that the implement used in the standard Roman crucifixion formed some sort of cross-like shape.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
"Stauros" lit. cross, an instrument of capital punishment, an upright pointed stake, oft. w. a crossbeam above it, or intersected by a crossbeam3.
Louw-Nida Lexicon:
["Stauros"] a pole stuck into the ground in an upright position with a crosspiece attached to its upper part so that it was shaped like a 'cross.'.....reference is probably to the crosspiece of the cross, which normally would have been carried by a man condemned to die4.
Barclay Newman Greek Dictionary and Thayer’s Lexicon both read simply: "Stauros" Cross5, 6.
A cruel prelude was occasionally scourging, which would cause the condemned to lose a large amount of blood, and approach a state of shock. The convict then usually had to carry the horizontal beam (patibulum in Latin) to the place of execution, but not necessarily the whole cross.[citation needed] Crucifixion was typically carried out by specialized teams, consisting of a commanding centurion and four soldiers.[citation needed] When it was done in an established place of execution, the vertical beam (stipes) could even be permanently embedded in the ground.[citation needed] The condemned was usually stripped naked—all the New Testament gospels describe soldiers gambling for the robes of Jesus.[56]
More info: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
40
« on: January 04, 2012, 11:46:47 AM »
Excellent post Melody...
I forgot to address the fact that Jesus walked the Earth after his Resurrection being seen by hundreds(?) if I'm not mistaken, not just his disciples. Wish I could find my resource on that. It was no secret.
MJonMind; God is a God of LOVE; but also a God of Righteousness & Judgement. Sin & light can not exist together. He loves us so much unconditionally that he paid the price of sin for us; but he will NOT violate our free will... The choice is ours; either we except him or we don't, either way every knee will bow & tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord.
There IS a very real PHYSICAL return coming; and it wasn't in 1914 or whatever.
Revelation 19: 11-16
And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself. And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God. (John 14: 7-11) And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean. And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.
This is the the climax of Armageddon; It hasn't happened yet... neither has his 1000 yr Millennial Kingdom Rein, or the Great White Throne Judgement, but anyone who can read the signs of the times knows we are at the doorstep of the coming Seven Year Tribulation. Let's not be like the foolish virgins looking for oil at the last minute and miss the party. The Bridegroom is coming; be ready.
Same can be said of Michael; either we believe he's coming back or we don't... Like the song at his memorial; Soon and very soon we are going to see the King.
I find it interesting that TS' redirect went back to the question; What does the true Ark look like? Is it really just a Gold box or something more? For me it looks like Jesus.
bearhug
Great post Ms Trinity!
I think you are referring to 1 Corinthians 15:1-11
6After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once; of whom the greater part remain unto this present, but some are fallen asleep.
Actually I think the reference I was looking for was possibly Josephus.
Here's some math that will blow your mind:
John 1:2-5
King James Version (KJV)
2The same was in the beginning with God.
3All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
4In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
5And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
Sum of John 1.2-5 = 23088 = 26 (YHVH)x 888 (JESUS)
This identity is astounding beyond description! It is the product of two fundamental Divine Names, (YHVH) - from the Unity Holograph - and Jesus, the name above all names! Glory! And all this in John 1.2-5!
It is extremely important to realize that the meaning of these two numbers had already been fully established for years before I found them embedded in the alphanumeric structure of the verse above. The meaning of the Number 26 remains eternally established in the personal name God designed for Himself - (YHVH). Its integration with the other primary names of God in the Unity Holograph greatly magnifies its glory. Likewise, the Number 888 rings and reverberates with the everlasting glory of the Lord of lords, Jesus! Halellujah! Furthermore, both of these numbers occur together in Malachi 3.6:
I am the LORD, I change Not
Ani YHVH, Lo Shaniti
= 888
The beauty of this identity is that the meaning of the verse is reflected in the form of the most symmetric number - 888 - which can be permuted, inverted and reflected in a mirror, all without change. To find these two numbers united in the Divine Prologue is simply too staggering to utter.
John is the Gospel of Light. The Divine Prologue links Creation and Light, just like Genesis 1. Rearranging the factors again now integrates the Number 23088 with the value of Genesis 1.4. We have the identity:
Sum of John 1.2-5 = 23088 = 13 x 1776 = 13 x 37 x 48
If you are reading these articles in order, you should recognize the last two factors, since they appear twice in the First Day Holograph! They also are embedded in the Great Seal of the United States of America, which displays a 13-step pyramid with the date 1776 at the base. Yet there is more. We also have the identity (note the iota subscript - which is written inline for clarity - is essential to this calculation):
In Him was life
En auto zoe en
= 2439 = 9 x 271
Light and Life! The Number 271 is the Tenth Hexagonal Number found in the heart of the Star of Israel 541. It appears three times in the First Day Holograph. We have, therefore, a double integration of John 1.2-5 with Genesis 1.3-4 via two primes that are themselves twice reiterated in the First Day Holograph:You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login bearhug
41
« on: January 04, 2012, 10:31:32 AM »
Wow...
First TS, then Front & Back. What's next? Up, down & sideways?! LOL :lol: :lol: :lol:
Oh ye of little faith.
I love the “tIME” to reveal ALL. LOL. Do you get it?
I AM ME ALL. Duh he's spelling it out who he is. I LOVE TS.  /bravo/
42
« on: December 29, 2011, 11:30:27 AM »
This is the the climax of Armageddon; It hasn't happened yet... neither has his 1000 yr Millennial Kingdom Rein, or the Great White Throne Judgement, but anyone who can read the signs of the times knows we are at the doorstep of the coming Seven Year Tribulation. Let's not be like the foolish virgins looking for oil at the last minute and miss the party. The Bridegroom is coming; be ready.
Ms Trinity, we both know you and i disagree on a lot of things - doctrine wise. its sad, but an honest fact. and thats ok. agree to disagree for peace /white flag/
However this post i agree with 100 percent. :-) Just wanted to let you know. it brought a smile to my face, there is a belief that we share in common afterall
I am waiting and just hoping that i measure up on the great day :-)
Peace and love to you!
I'm happy to hear from you! Actually I've been wanting to tell you that you & I AGREE far more than we disagree. bearhug
43
« on: December 28, 2011, 06:44:05 PM »
I have an update concerning the PHYSICAL ARK:
Grant Jeffrey covers the True Ark; as in the physical one in part two of this series: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
I started with part one... this guy is one of the Best of the best concerning Bible Prophecy & End Times study, this whole series has guests from the very top of this field. I encourage everyone to listen to the whole series; both season 1 & 2. It's been a while since I've gone through them so I am personally going through all the links I have posted lately myself picking up important information I have forgotten. It's very interesting, in part two he says they have it...The Sanhedrin...in Jerusalem...the physical Ark. It's been brought back from Ethiopia.All of Apocalypse & the End Times - Series 1: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginApocalypse & the End Times - Series 2: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
44
« on: December 28, 2011, 06:37:24 PM »
I've got an update for you guys. bounce/  Grant Jeffrey covers the True Ark; as in the physical one in part two You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
I started with part one... this guy is one of the Best of the best concerning Bible Prophecy & End Times study, this whole series has guests from the very top of this field. I encourage everyone to listen to the whole series; both season 1 & 2. It's been a while since I've gone through them so I am personally going through all the links I have posted lately myself picking up important information I have forgotten. It's very interesting, in part two he says they have it...The Sanhedrin...in Jerusalem...the physical Ark. It's been brought back from Ethiopia. All of The Book of Revelation Chuck Missler: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginAll of Apocalypse & the End Times - Series 1: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginApocalypse & the End Times - Series 2: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
45
« on: December 28, 2011, 06:13:16 PM »
Grant Jeffrey covers the True Ark; as in the physical one in part two You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
I started with part one... this guy is one of the best of the best concerning Bible Prophecy & End Times study, this whole series has guests from the very top of this field. It's been a while since I've gone through them so I am personally going through all the links I have posted myself picking up important information I have forgotten. It's very interesting, in part two he says they have it; the physical Ark. It's been brought back from Ethiopia. bearhug
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 24
|
Show Posts
