Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - jono

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 18
31
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: December 15, 2012, 02:52:30 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Wow, 22 more children in China??  So much tragedy for one day! BTC is right though, we have to remember that 1000's of "unknown, or "Lost" children, die every day,and as my husband pointed out just now,most of our world's children that die daily, die after extreme suffering, due to starvation, or disease, Regardless...it is just WRONG that in this day and age,we can still sit by while the rich get richer and the poor children die!...


[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jj2pxacpIGA[/youtube]

32
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: December 10, 2012, 11:50:30 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
RK:

Quote
Also...am I the only one who doesn't have any apprehension about the BAM? I'm fully expecting it.....not a doubt....not a worry....just biding time.

Same here RK  :bearhug:

+1

Don't worry, be happy  :icon_e_biggrin:


[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-diB65scQU[/youtube]


33
TIAI ~ 2012 / Re: TIAI December 10
« on: December 10, 2012, 06:47:00 AM »
I was actually thinking about this tweet the other day... I "re-tweeted" it on my facebook account back then  :icon_razz:

Looking forward to the BAM Michael!!  :woohoo2:

Our prayers are with you..

 :bearhug:

34
TIAI ~ 2011 / Re: TIAI November 11 (11-11-11)
« on: December 05, 2012, 07:02:42 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Thanks Jono, I watched much of the video. Thousands of educated professionals in related fields were unanimous --all 3 buildings controlled demolition. 

Yet the FBI ignored scientific evidence.  They may even be part of the perpetrators.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Quote
They were the most lethal terrorist attacks in history, taking the lives of 3,000 Americans and international citizens and ultimately leading to far-reaching changes in anti-terror approaches and operations in the U.S. and around the globe.

Our ensuing investigation of the attacks of 9/11—code-named “PENTTBOM”—was our largest investigation ever. At the peak of the case, more than half our agents worked to identify the hijackers and their sponsors and, with other agencies, to head off any possible future attacks. We followed more than half-a-million investigative leads, including several hundred thousand tips from the public. The attack and crash sites also represented the largest crime scenes in FBI history.
For more information:

Press Release of September 27, 2001 with photographs of the 19 hijackers
American Airlines #11
American Airlines #77
United Airlines #93
United Airlines #175

Zacarias Moussaoui: In April 2005, Moussaoui pled guilty to six charges against him related to his participation in the 9/11 conspiracy. In May 2006, he was sentenced to life in prison.
Director Mueller’s Statement on the Indictment on December 11, 2001

Indictment
FBI Agent Lenny Hatton—who died in the 9/11 attacks—is presented the heroes medal of valor. Former FBI Special Agent in Charge John P. O’Neill also lost his life in the attacks.

Here's a former FBI chief speaking out and saying CIA and FBI were behind the 911 attacks to bring in laws restricting our freedoms, and planning initially started in Great Britain.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BKP5iNof5M[/youtube]

So if one former FBI chief can speak out against his own group, are there others who work inside that could be MJ's key person?  Almost seems possible to me.

Yes, yes! Key people in the right places... Playing their own game against them (TPTB)...  :D

Btw. Now even seismic evidence implies controlled demolition on 9/11 - You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

As I can recall, TS confirmed the story of Michael canceling a meeting at the WTC the morning of 9/11? Pretty scary!  :icon_pale:

35
TIAI ~ 2011 / Re: TIAI November 11 (11-11-11)
« on: December 05, 2012, 03:57:31 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Quote
1.Protect the United States from terrorist attacks (see counter-terrorism);

See right there is the first involvement in deception.  Are they supporting that Arab terrorists with newly acquired flying licenses commandeered planes into the Trade towers.  Ever since then, the US government has had the excuse/okay to up security everywhere.  The many engineers/demolition/pilot experts who spoke against the official story, would agree the US Commission to look into 911 was a farce and further cover-up. Of course the whole media world was complicit.

 :th_bravo:


[youtube]
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login[/youtube]

36
TIAI ~ 2011 / Re: TIAI November 11 (11-11-11)
« on: December 05, 2012, 03:54:47 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Andrea, maybe TS simply meant ‘no body’ in the casket or burial, yet still one on the way to UCLA.  The FBI article was talking about graveyards afterall, not the 911 dying stage.

Paula quoted Strike
Quote
Besides, as much as MJ means to us, FBI has no competence of acting as personal bodyguard or favors for anyone unless it's professional. And so far I don't see the positive connection between this institution and Michael's persona. I guess if there were any, Michael's damaging trials would have never taken place.
I wondered about why they didn't intervene but just let the jury do their thing, taking that chance. :icon_e_confused:

Ellyd, are you suggesting a sting on the FBI?  Because since the very first time TS mentioned their involvement, my first reaction was that they were linked to the CIA, corrupt US government, 911 cover-up, banker money, and consequently Israel.  Afterall doesn’t the buck stop at the FBI?  Aren’t they the ones US citizens should fear, the final authority?  I recall many movies with FBI playing a small part, and ALWAYS without fail, they are seen as the good guys, almost like angels.  What if that is all a big fat lie?  There’s many lies Hollywood has been telling us for decades, that I don’t want to get into here.

Well, the thing going on in my brain since almost the beginning, is EITHER of two ways.  One, this is all of the Illuminati/TPTB’s orchestration using MJ as a mind-conrolled slave since childhood, brilliantly using numerology as they have for centuries, moving behind the scenes, creating wars, dramas, social divides, seducing the public through Hollywood and the music industry, and moving us toward a scenario where MJ fulfills their Biblical Revelation prophecy for their world domination or NWO.  After-all, even the Chilean minor’s story was riddled with numerology.

Or two, MJ is using some of ‘their’ techniques to beat them at their game, and that there are (like TS says) key secret players in each strategic place that are on side in this hoax, and that MJ has some kind of super-natural power on side for him, protecting him and covering the eyes of the enemy.  On many posts, Back/Front/TS have hinted at this special protection and guidance from God.  I know this sounds like a cop-out answer, just like the ‘FBI doesn’t tell MJ everything’, and ‘everybody’s in on the hoax’.   But otherwise I can totally understand why this whole set-up just does not jive with the info we’ve been given.  We have studied in depth the rabbit trails of all the people out to get MJ behind the scenes, which has totally convinced 95% of the MJ fan base that MJ has been murdered.  Has all that been made up?  The underside of web connections to other shadowy people involved in the 2005 trial run very deep, we’ve talked even the Vatican being involved.  The crime rings of pedophilia involve world leaders and the most wealthy/powerful on earth.  I feel there’s another layer involved that simply cannot be easily revealed to us by TS.  Obviously I wouldn't be here if I truly believed the first option.

 :abouttime:         :th_bravo:

37
TIAI ~ 2011 / Re: TIAI November 11 (11-11-11)
« on: December 02, 2012, 11:22:42 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

As has happened many times in the past, I think sometimes we misinterpret what is being said...not just what TS says but also each other. 

TS:
Quote
And in the very unlikely chance that both patients backed out simultaneously, when there was not enough time left to bring in a third DWD patient, a dummy could still be used with no greater risk than what many on this thread already think is a very low risk method.

Notice what TS is comparing here....which is indicated AFTER the 'than', as with any instance of comparing two things.  He did NOT say "no greater risk than using a real body/corpse/DWD patient".  I interpret his statement as meaning IF they had to switch to Plan C....a dummy would have been no greater risk than what WE had already outlined as the risks in using one.  Not sure if that makes sense.



Oh yes, I agree, the devil is in the details and the details are in the second part of that sentence, as you rightfully pointed out, the portion of the sentence after the "than". I said something about that part earlier and I'll just quote myself:

Quote
If a dummy could be used with no greater risk, why not use one? I don't understand. If TS_comments doesn't agree with "many on this thread", then why did he use this 3rd option as support for the DWD patient? So then he does agree with "many on this thread" that using a dummy carries no greater risk then using a DWD patient; if the DWD patients back out they'll just use a dummy, no problem?

TS_comments said this in conjunction with "proving" the DWD theory, as in; here are the 3 layers of protection for using a DWD patient ("use", ugh). 3 layers of protection: layer one, first DWD patient-->he drops out last minute, bring in layer two, 2nd DWD patient-->he drops out last minute as well, bring in layer 3, a dummy?? Huh?

If TS_comments does not agree with "many on this thread" that the dummy option carries "no greater risk" then why did he include it in his own layers of protection in an attempt to prove his theory?

I wouldn't use "proof" I didn't agree with/didn't make sense to me when trying to validate a theory. At least not if I wanted it to be seriously considered. That would be sloppy investigative work and to say the least, TS_comments never struck me as sloppy.

Using logic, TS_comments does agree with "many on this thread" that the dummy carries "no greater risk" then a DWD patient, else he would not have used it to support his theory. Further use of logic causes me to continue to question this "Truth" that a DWD patient was involved in MJ's hoax, I'll explain. If a dummy could replace a DWD patient then this means that a real person's body was not necessary for success of the project. And if it wasn't necessary... why would they go through the trouble of involving this alleged additional person? Why would they go through the trouble of ensuring this person died with a timing that supported the numerology when using a dummy was a viable option?

I think we are being constantly redirected purposefully and I think this is part of, if not the point of, the game.

 :th_bravo:

38
TIAI ~ 2011 / Re: TIAI November 11 (11-11-11)
« on: December 02, 2012, 04:00:26 AM »
One can interpret TS either way (he just had to throw that DA post in there, lol). No point arguing over it.

 :bearhug:

Happy now MJ? You prankster!  :icon_lol:

39
TIAI ~ 2011 / Re: TIAI November 11 (11-11-11)
« on: December 01, 2012, 05:35:32 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I vote NO to Body, NO to DWD / HOSPICE and YES to both or either Dummy / MJ. I also vote YES to Devils Advocate!  :icon_razz: :icon_razz: :icon_razz:

.....Don't fret TS may have the ol' joker card of devils advocate... The list is NOT BS!


 :th_bravo:

40
TIAI ~ 2011 / Re: TIAI November 11 (11-11-11)
« on: November 30, 2012, 02:55:21 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You guys are all very sweet, as always, supportive, I thank you.

But here's the problem.

In regards to what we know: I think I know a lot of things. I use the same logic and same common sense methods to evaluate a lot of information, and the same brain that thought it knew what was up with Level 7 is the same brain that I use when I say I (think) I know that MJ is not dead. Same methods, same investigation skills, same access to same information.

You follow?

Doesn't bode well for my ability to discern truth in anything.

Evidence for DWD patient is same evidence for Dead MJ.

Hey bec, don’t be so quick now! Remember.. MJ is a prankster! He is not going to give away all the answers just like that…
I am sure he wants to play us a little bit as well!

Some surprises saved for BAMsday (and after) I am sure…  :D

41
TIAI ~ 2011 / Re: TIAI November 11 (11-11-11)
« on: November 30, 2012, 07:07:52 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

“Finally, just like last time, I may play “DA” (devil's advocate)—and try to debunk things that are true, just to keep you on your toes!”
{You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login}

Love to bec, and everyone else!

:bearhug:    :bearhug:    :bearhug:

P.S. @Front: what grade do I get?  An “A”, an “F”, or an “N”??

:icon_lol:   :icon_lol:

I'm thinking "hmmmm" here...   :animal0017:

TS, you're a sneaky one!

 :bearhug:

PS. Am I the only one still thinking "dummy"?  :icon_lol:

42
TIAI ~ 2011 / Re: TIAI November 11 (11-11-11)
« on: November 30, 2012, 04:28:02 AM »
Looks like I am late to the party!...  :o

Well... As long as I don't miss the BAM party I'll be alright!

:multiplespotting: 

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


Haha! Good one Front!  :LolLolLolLol:    The suspense...

43
TIAI ~ 2011 / Re: TIAI November 11 (11-11-11)
« on: November 29, 2012, 02:28:25 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Because DWD is not legal in CA, and the CA penal code specifically lays out how the state law considers a second party's knowledge of or encouragement for suicide, it would be illegal for MJ and AEG (or equivalent--whoever is the production company working with MJ) to use a DWD patient to help MJ fake his death. They would already be guilty of failure to report, encouraging suicide, facilitating a suicide: essentially aiding and abetting a suicide. These are felony crimes.

I am looking forward to your answer on this one TS!   :D

44
TIAI ~ 2011 / Re: TIAI November 11 (11-11-11)
« on: November 28, 2012, 06:04:07 AM »
@bec... Well done!

A+


 :bearhug:

45
TIAI ~ 2011 / Re: TIAI November 11 (11-11-11)
« on: November 27, 2012, 11:27:08 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Wait, I have homework? Why just me?

I didn't see that before I posted that novel. Hmm, ok, I shall do my best.

Anyone wanna help?  :smiley-vault-misc-150:

 :over-react-smiley:    :LolLolLolLol:

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 18
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal